Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 08/31] drm/xe: VM LRU bulk move
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 17:39:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZFlsAMZ7Zfwf97K/@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230502001727.3211096-9-matthew.brost@intel.com>

On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 05:17:04PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Use the TTM LRU bulk move for BOs tied to a VM. Update the bulk moves
> LRU position on every exec.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c       | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h       |  4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c  |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c     |  6 ++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h |  3 +++
>  5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> index 3ab404e33fae..da99ee53e7d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> @@ -985,6 +985,23 @@ static void xe_gem_object_free(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
>  	ttm_bo_put(container_of(obj, struct ttm_buffer_object, base));
>  }
>  
> +static void xe_gem_object_close(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
> +				struct drm_file *file_priv)
> +{
> +	struct xe_bo *bo = gem_to_xe_bo(obj);
> +
> +	if (bo->vm && !xe_vm_no_dma_fences(bo->vm)) {
> +		struct ww_acquire_ctx ww;
> +
> +		XE_BUG_ON(!xe_bo_is_user(bo));

We need to really stop using BUG_ON and move towards the usage of more WARNs.

But the rest of the patch looks good to me... I just believe it would be
good to get Thomas' review here.

> +
> +		xe_bo_lock(bo, &ww, 0, false);
> +		ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(&bo->ttm, NULL);
> +		xe_bo_unlock(bo, &ww);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +
>  static bool should_migrate_to_system(struct xe_bo *bo)
>  {
>  	struct xe_device *xe = xe_bo_device(bo);
> @@ -1040,6 +1057,7 @@ static const struct vm_operations_struct xe_gem_vm_ops = {
>  
>  static const struct drm_gem_object_funcs xe_gem_object_funcs = {
>  	.free = xe_gem_object_free,
> +	.close = xe_gem_object_close,
>  	.mmap = drm_gem_ttm_mmap,
>  	.export = xe_gem_prime_export,
>  	.vm_ops = &xe_gem_vm_ops,
> @@ -1081,8 +1099,8 @@ void xe_bo_free(struct xe_bo *bo)
>  
>  struct xe_bo *__xe_bo_create_locked(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
>  				    struct xe_gt *gt, struct dma_resv *resv,
> -				    size_t size, enum ttm_bo_type type,
> -				    u32 flags)
> +				    struct ttm_lru_bulk_move *bulk, size_t size,
> +				    enum ttm_bo_type type, u32 flags)
>  {
>  	struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = {
>  		.interruptible = true,
> @@ -1149,7 +1167,10 @@ struct xe_bo *__xe_bo_create_locked(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
>  		return ERR_PTR(err);
>  
>  	bo->created = true;
> -	ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail_unlocked(&bo->ttm);
> +	if (bulk)
> +		ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(&bo->ttm, bulk);
> +	else
> +		ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail_unlocked(&bo->ttm);
>  
>  	return bo;
>  }
> @@ -1219,7 +1240,10 @@ xe_bo_create_locked_range(struct xe_device *xe,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	bo = __xe_bo_create_locked(xe, bo, gt, vm ? &vm->resv : NULL, size,
> +	bo = __xe_bo_create_locked(xe, bo, gt, vm ? &vm->resv : NULL,
> +				   vm && !xe_vm_no_dma_fences(vm) &&
> +				   flags & XE_BO_CREATE_USER_BIT ?
> +				   &vm->lru_bulk_move : NULL, size,
>  				   type, flags);
>  	if (IS_ERR(bo))
>  		return bo;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> index 8354d05ccdf3..25457b3c757b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> @@ -81,8 +81,8 @@ void xe_bo_free(struct xe_bo *bo);
>  
>  struct xe_bo *__xe_bo_create_locked(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
>  				    struct xe_gt *gt, struct dma_resv *resv,
> -				    size_t size, enum ttm_bo_type type,
> -				    u32 flags);
> +				    struct ttm_lru_bulk_move *bulk, size_t size,
> +				    enum ttm_bo_type type, u32 flags);
>  struct xe_bo *
>  xe_bo_create_locked_range(struct xe_device *xe,
>  			  struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_vm *vm,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
> index 9b252cc782b7..975dee1f770f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ xe_dma_buf_init_obj(struct drm_device *dev, struct xe_bo *storage,
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	dma_resv_lock(resv, NULL);
> -	bo = __xe_bo_create_locked(xe, storage, NULL, resv, dma_buf->size,
> +	bo = __xe_bo_create_locked(xe, storage, NULL, resv, NULL, dma_buf->size,
>  				   ttm_bo_type_sg, XE_BO_CREATE_SYSTEM_BIT);
>  	if (IS_ERR(bo)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(bo);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> index 44ea9bcd0066..21a9c2fddf86 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> @@ -374,6 +374,12 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
>  	xe_sched_job_push(job);
>  	xe_vm_reactivate_rebind(vm);
>  
> +	if (!err && !xe_vm_no_dma_fences(vm)) {
> +		spin_lock(&xe->ttm.lru_lock);
> +		ttm_lru_bulk_move_tail(&vm->lru_bulk_move);
> +		spin_unlock(&xe->ttm.lru_lock);
> +	}
> +
>  err_repin:
>  	if (!xe_vm_no_dma_fences(vm))
>  		up_read(&vm->userptr.notifier_lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> index fada7896867f..d3e99f22510d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> @@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ struct xe_vm {
>  	/** Protects @rebind_list and the page-table structures */
>  	struct dma_resv resv;
>  
> +	/** @lru_bulk_move: Bulk LRU move list for this VM's BOs */
> +	struct ttm_lru_bulk_move lru_bulk_move;
> +
>  	u64 size;
>  	struct rb_root vmas;
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-08 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-02  0:16 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 00/31] Upstreaming prep / all of mbrosts patches Matthew Brost
2023-05-02  0:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 01/31] drm/sched: Add run_wq argument to drm_sched_init Matthew Brost
2023-05-03 12:03   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-03 15:06     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 18:24       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-02  0:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 02/31] drm/sched: Move schedule policy to scheduler Matthew Brost
2023-05-03 12:13   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-03 15:11     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-02  0:16 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 03/31] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 12:40   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-22  1:16     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 04/31] drm/xe: Use DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY mode Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 12:41   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 05/31] drm/xe: Long running job update Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 18:36   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-08  1:14     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 13:14   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-09 14:56     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 15:21       ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-09 22:16         ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-10  8:15           ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-09 22:21     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 06/31] drm/xe: Ensure LR engines are not persistent Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 18:38   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-08  1:03     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 12:21   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 07/31] drm/xe: Only try to lock external BOs in VM bind Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 18:40   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-08  1:08     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-08  1:15       ` Christopher Snowhill
2023-05-08 21:34       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-09 12:29         ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-10 23:25           ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-11  7:43             ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-08  1:17   ` Christopher Snowhill
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 08/31] drm/xe: VM LRU bulk move Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 21:39   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-05-09 22:09     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-10  1:37       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-09 12:47   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-09 22:05     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-10  8:14       ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-10 18:40         ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-11  7:24           ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-11 14:11             ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-12  9:03               ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 09/31] drm/xe/guc: Read HXG fields from DW1 of G2H response Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 18:50   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-09 12:49   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 10/31] drm/xe/guc: Return the lower part of blocking H2G message Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 18:52   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-08  1:10     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-08  9:20       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 11/31] drm/xe/guc: Use doorbells for submission if possible Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 21:42   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-10  0:49     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 13:00   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-10  0:51     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-21 12:32   ` Oded Gabbay
2023-06-08 19:30     ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-12 13:01       ` Oded Gabbay
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 12/31] drm/xe/guc: Print doorbell ID in GuC engine debugfs entry Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 18:55   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-09 13:01     ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 13/31] maple_tree: split up MA_STATE() macro Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 13:21   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-10  0:29     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 14/31] maple_tree: Export mas_preallocate Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 13:33   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-10  0:31     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 15/31] drm: manager to keep track of GPUs VA mappings Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 13:49   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-10  0:55     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 16/31] drm/xe: Port Xe to GPUVA Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 13:52   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-11  2:41     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-11  7:39       ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 17/31] drm/xe: NULL binding implementation Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 14:34   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11  2:52     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 15:17   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 18/31] drm/xe: Avoid doing rebinds Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 14:48   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 19/31] drm/xe: Reduce the number list links in xe_vma Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 21:43   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11  8:38   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 20/31] drm/xe: Optimize size of xe_vma allocation Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 19:37   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-08  1:21     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-11  9:05   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 21/31] drm/gpuva: Add drm device to GPUVA manager Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 19:39   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11  9:06     ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 22/31] drm/gpuva: Move dma-resv " Matthew Brost
2023-05-11  9:10   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 23/31] drm/gpuva: Add support for extobj Matthew Brost
2023-05-11  9:35   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 24/31] drm/xe: Userptr refactor Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 19:41   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11  9:46   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 25/31] drm: execution context for GEM buffers v3 Matthew Brost
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 26/31] drm/exec: Always compile drm_exec Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 14:45   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-10  0:37     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-10  0:38     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 27/31] drm/xe: Use drm_exec for locking rather than TTM exec helpers Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 19:42   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11 10:01   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 28/31] drm/xe: Allow dma-fences as in-syncs for compute / faulting VM Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 19:43   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-08  1:19     ` Matthew Brost
2023-05-08 21:29       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11 10:03   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 29/31] drm/xe: Allow compute VMs to output dma-fences on binds Matthew Brost
2023-05-09 14:50   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11 10:04   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 30/31] drm/xe: remove async worker, sync binds, new error handling Matthew Brost
2023-05-17 16:53   ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:17 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 31/31] drm/xe/uapi: Add some VM bind kernel doc Matthew Brost
2023-05-05 19:45   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-05-11 10:14     ` Thomas Hellström
2023-05-02  0:20 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Upstreaming prep / all of mbrosts patches (rev2) Patchwork
2023-05-02  1:54   ` Christopher Snowhill (kode54)
2023-05-02  1:59   ` Christopher Snowhill (kode54)
2023-05-03 12:37 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 00/31] Upstreaming prep / all of mbrosts patches Thomas Hellström
2023-05-03 15:27   ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZFlsAMZ7Zfwf97K/@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox