From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/xe: Add LRC ctx timestamp support functions
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 14:10:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmcJXuiaOBGvH7R1@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dloqxdmjpfyppmq57mxjbm3rpviu54uu43nykl2kq64oifc4mz@wa7jy3wqtlgw>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:49:57AM -0500, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 05:20:58PM GMT, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > LRC ctx timestamp support functions are used to determine how long a job
> > has run on the hardware.
> >
> > v2:
> > - Don't use static inlines (Jani)
> > - Kernel doc
> > - s/ctx_timestamp_job/ctx_job_timestamp
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h | 5 +++
> > 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> > index c1bb85d2e243..0fef354c6489 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c
> > @@ -652,6 +652,7 @@ u32 xe_lrc_pphwsp_offset(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> >
> > #define LRC_SEQNO_PPHWSP_OFFSET 512
> > #define LRC_START_SEQNO_PPHWSP_OFFSET (LRC_SEQNO_PPHWSP_OFFSET + 8)
> > +#define LRC_CTX_JOB_TIMESTAMP_OFFSET (LRC_START_SEQNO_PPHWSP_OFFSET + 8)
> > #define LRC_PARALLEL_PPHWSP_OFFSET 2048
> > #define LRC_PPHWSP_SIZE SZ_4K
> >
> > @@ -680,6 +681,12 @@ static inline u32 __xe_lrc_start_seqno_offset(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> > return xe_lrc_pphwsp_offset(lrc) + LRC_START_SEQNO_PPHWSP_OFFSET;
> > }
> >
> > +static u32 __xe_lrc_ctx_job_timestamp_offset(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> > +{
> > + /* The start seqno is stored in the driver-defined portion of PPHWSP */
> > + return xe_lrc_pphwsp_offset(lrc) + LRC_CTX_JOB_TIMESTAMP_OFFSET;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline u32 __xe_lrc_parallel_offset(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> > {
> > /* The parallel is stored in the driver-defined portion of PPHWSP */
> > @@ -691,6 +698,11 @@ static inline u32 __xe_lrc_regs_offset(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> > return xe_lrc_pphwsp_offset(lrc) + LRC_PPHWSP_SIZE;
> > }
> >
> > +static u32 __xe_lrc_ctx_timestamp_offset(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> > +{
> > + return __xe_lrc_regs_offset(lrc) + CTX_TIMESTAMP * sizeof(u32);
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline u32 __xe_lrc_indirect_ring_offset(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> > {
> > /* Indirect ring state page is at the very end of LRC */
> > @@ -716,11 +728,65 @@ DECL_MAP_ADDR_HELPERS(pphwsp)
> > DECL_MAP_ADDR_HELPERS(seqno)
> > DECL_MAP_ADDR_HELPERS(regs)
> > DECL_MAP_ADDR_HELPERS(start_seqno)
> > +DECL_MAP_ADDR_HELPERS(ctx_job_timestamp)
> > +DECL_MAP_ADDR_HELPERS(ctx_timestamp)
> > DECL_MAP_ADDR_HELPERS(parallel)
> > DECL_MAP_ADDR_HELPERS(indirect_ring)
> >
> > #undef DECL_MAP_ADDR_HELPERS
> >
> > +/**
> > + * xe_lrc_ctx_timestamp_ggtt_addr() - Get ctx timestamp GGTT address
> > + * @lrc: Pointer to the lrc.
> > + *
> > + * Returns: ctx timestamp GGTT address
> > + */
> > +u32 xe_lrc_ctx_timestamp_ggtt_addr(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> > +{
> > + return __xe_lrc_ctx_timestamp_ggtt_addr(lrc);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * xe_lrc_ctx_timestamp_addr() - Read ctx timestamp value
> > + * @lrc: Pointer to the lrc.
> > + *
> > + * Returns: ctx timestamp value
> > + */
> > +u32 xe_lrc_ctx_timestamp(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> > +{
> > + struct xe_device *xe = lrc_to_xe(lrc);
> > + struct iosys_map map;
> > +
> > + map = __xe_lrc_ctx_timestamp_map(lrc);
> > + return xe_map_read32(xe, &map);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * xe_lrc_ctx_job_timestamp_ggtt_addr() - Get ctx job timestamp GGTT address
> > + * @lrc: Pointer to the lrc.
> > + *
> > + * Returns: ctx timestamp job GGTT address
> > + */
> > +u32 xe_lrc_ctx_job_timestamp_ggtt_addr(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> > +{
> > + return __xe_lrc_ctx_job_timestamp_ggtt_addr(lrc);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * xe_lrc_ctx_job_timestamp_addr() - Read ctx job timestamp value
> > + * @lrc: Pointer to the lrc.
> > + *
> > + * Returns: ctx timestamp job value
> > + */
> > +u32 xe_lrc_ctx_job_timestamp(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> > +{
> > + struct xe_device *xe = lrc_to_xe(lrc);
> > + struct iosys_map map;
> > +
> > + map = __xe_lrc_ctx_job_timestamp_map(lrc);
> > + return xe_map_read32(xe, &map);
> > +}
> > +
> > u32 xe_lrc_ggtt_addr(struct xe_lrc *lrc)
> > {
> > return __xe_lrc_pphwsp_ggtt_addr(lrc);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> > index 882c3437ba5c..001af6c79454 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h
> > @@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ void xe_lrc_snapshot_capture_delayed(struct xe_lrc_snapshot *snapshot);
> > void xe_lrc_snapshot_print(struct xe_lrc_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_printer *p);
> > void xe_lrc_snapshot_free(struct xe_lrc_snapshot *snapshot);
> >
> > +u32 xe_lrc_ctx_timestamp_ggtt_addr(struct xe_lrc *lrc);
> > +u32 xe_lrc_ctx_timestamp(struct xe_lrc *lrc);
>
Bad timing, just sent v4 at the same time.
> I think we have some clash here. See the function below where we
> read the timestamp and cache it in the LRC. That one does something
> slightly different, but apparently the same thing. Why are these
> functions not using similar approch with xe_lrc_read_ctx_reg() rather
> than defining new helper functions? And why would we return the address
> and then having another function to read the value?
xe_lrc_read_ctx_reg(lrc, CTX_TIMESTAMP); is the same as: xe_lrc_ctx_timestamp(lrc);
I used 'DECL_MAP_ADDR_HELPERS' to implement the 4 exported functions
mainly as I need the GGTT address and that macro spits out a helper
with the GGTT address.
fwiw, also xe_lrc_read_ctx_reg is implemented with one of these
functions from DECL_MAP_ADDR_HELPERS - __xe_lrc_regs_map.
I'd vote, leave patch mainly as is but replace existing
xe_lrc_read_ctx_reg(lrc, CTX_TIMESTAMP); with
xe_lrc_ctx_timestamp(lrc);.
If you want to cleanup the file itself and drop these macros, that seems
to be an orthogonal issue to my series.
Matt
>
> Lucas De Marchi
>
> > +u32 xe_lrc_ctx_job_timestamp_ggtt_addr(struct xe_lrc *lrc);
> > +u32 xe_lrc_ctx_job_timestamp(struct xe_lrc *lrc);
> > +
> > /**
> > * xe_lrc_update_timestamp - readout LRC timestamp and update cached value
> > * @lrc: logical ring context for this exec queue
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-10 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-08 0:20 [PATCH v3 0/6] Only timeout jobs if they run longer than timeout period Matthew Brost
2024-06-08 0:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/xe: Add LRC ctx timestamp support functions Matthew Brost
2024-06-10 13:49 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-06-10 14:10 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-06-10 17:42 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-06-08 0:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] drm/xe: Add MI_COPY_MEM_MEM GPU instruction definitions Matthew Brost
2024-06-08 0:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/xe: Emit ctx timestamp copy in ring ops Matthew Brost
2024-06-08 0:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] drm/xe: Add ctx timestamp to LRC snapshot Matthew Brost
2024-06-08 0:21 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] drm/xe: Add xe_gt_clock_interval_to_ms helper Matthew Brost
2024-06-08 0:21 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] drm/xe: Sample ctx timestamp to determine if jobs have timed out Matthew Brost
2024-06-08 2:13 ` John Harrison
2024-06-08 2:29 ` Matthew Brost
2024-06-08 0:25 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Only timeout jobs if they run longer than timeout period Patchwork
2024-06-08 0:25 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-06-08 0:26 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-06-08 0:37 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-06-08 0:39 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-08 0:41 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-06-08 1:27 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-06-08 16:55 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZmcJXuiaOBGvH7R1@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox