From: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 1/9] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Introduce xe_hw_engine_group
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 09:40:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zp4M8kQaf4wIOqfv@fdugast-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zpgbg9B06Wdbwirn@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 07:29:07PM +0000, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 03:07:22PM +0200, Francois Dugast wrote:
> > A xe_hw_engine_group is a group of hw engines. Two hw engines belong
> > to the same xe_hw_engine_group if one hw engine cannot make progress
> > while the other is stuck on a page fault.
> >
> > Typically, hw engines of the same group share some resources such as
> > EUs. This depends on the hardware configuration of the platforms.
> >
> > Currently all engines share EUs so for now only one group is created
> > and assigned to all hw engines.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_types.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
> > index 78b50d3a6501..f8df85d25617 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
> > @@ -431,6 +431,53 @@ hw_engine_setup_default_state(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe)
> > xe_rtp_process_to_sr(&ctx, engine_entries, &hwe->reg_sr);
> > }
> >
> > +static struct xe_hw_engine_group *
> > +hw_engine_group_alloc(struct xe_device *xe)
> > +{
> > + struct xe_hw_engine_group *group;
> > +
> > + group = kzalloc(sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Need to handle kzalloc failing here, e.g.
>
> if (!group)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> > + init_rwsem(&group->mode_sem);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->exec_queue_list);
> > +
> > + return group;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
>
> This can fail, so:
>
> static int
>
> > +hw_engine_setup_groups(struct xe_gt *gt)
> > +{
> > + struct xe_hw_engine *hwe;
> > + enum xe_hw_engine_id id;
> > + struct xe_hw_engine_group *group_rcs_ccs, *group_bcs, *group_vcs_vecs;
> > + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Current partitioning implies all engines share EUs therefore
> > + * belong to the same group, so create this group and assign it
> > + * to all engines.
> > + */
> > + group_rcs_ccs = hw_engine_group_alloc(xe);
>
> if (IS_ERR(group_rcs_ccs))
> return PTR_ERR(group_rcs_ccs);
>
> Also you will need to cleanup these allocations on failures and on
> driver unload. For driver unload cleanup use drmm_add_action_or_reset, I
> suggest adding that below.
>
> > + group_bcs = hw_engine_group_alloc(xe);
> > + group_vcs_vecs = hw_engine_group_alloc(xe);
> > + for_each_hw_engine(hwe, gt, id) {
> > + switch (hwe->class) {
> > + case XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY:
> > + hwe->hw_engine_group = group_bcs;
> > + break;
> > + case XE_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER:
> > + case XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE:
> > + hwe->hw_engine_group = group_rcs_ccs;
> > + break;
> > + case XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE:
> > + case XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE:
> > + hwe->hw_engine_group = group_vcs_vecs;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + drm_warn(&xe->drm, "hw engine class not handled");
>
> I don't think this is a warn as the GSC (XE_ENGINE_CLASS_OTHER) doesn't
> need a group as it is not exposed to user space but pretty sure shows up
> in the for_each_hw_engine loop.
>
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static void hw_engine_init_early(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_hw_engine *hwe,
> > enum xe_hw_engine_id id)
> > {
> > @@ -761,6 +808,7 @@ int xe_hw_engines_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> > }
> >
> > hw_engine_setup_logical_mapping(gt);
> > + hw_engine_setup_groups(gt);
>
> err = hw_engine_setup_groups(gt);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> >
> > return 0;
>
> return drmm_add_action_or_reset(..., function_to_kfree_groups);
>
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_types.h
> > index 70e6434f150d..c6f7bbcb2a41 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_types.h
> > @@ -100,6 +100,35 @@ struct xe_hw_engine_class_intf {
> > } sched_props, defaults;
> > };
> >
> > +/** enum xe_hw_engine_group_execution_mode - possible execution modes of a hw engine group */
> > +enum xe_hw_engine_group_execution_mode {
> > + EXEC_MODE_LR,
> > + EXEC_MODE_DMA_FENCE,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct xe_hw_engine_group - Hardware engine group
> > + *
> > + * hw engines belong to the same group if they share hardware resources in
> > + * a way that prevents them from making progress when one is stuck on a
> > + * page fault.
> > + */
> > +struct xe_hw_engine_group {
> > + /** @exec_queue_list: list of exec queues attached to this xe_hw_engine_group */
> > + struct list_head exec_queue_list;
> > + /** @resume_work: worker to resume LR exec queues */
> > + struct work_struct resume_work;
> > + /** @resume_wq: workqueue to resume LR exec queues */
> > + struct workqueue_struct *resume_wq;
>
> Assume these two members (resume_*) are setup later in the series?
Yes they are, in "drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Resume LR exec queues suspended by dma fence jobs".
Francois
>
> > + /** @mode_sem: used to protect this group's hardware resources and
> > + * ensure mutual exclusion between execution only in LR mode
> > + * and execution only in DMA_FENCE mode
> > + */
>
> Prefer this style for multi line kernel doc:
>
> /**
> * @foo: some description...
> */
>
> Matt
>
> > + struct rw_semaphore mode_sem;
> > + /** @cur_mode: current execution mode of this hw engine group */
> > + enum xe_hw_engine_group_execution_mode cur_mode;
> > +};
> > +
> > /**
> > * struct xe_hw_engine - Hardware engine
> > *
> > @@ -150,6 +179,8 @@ struct xe_hw_engine {
> > struct xe_hw_engine_class_intf *eclass;
> > /** @oa_unit: oa unit for this hw engine */
> > struct xe_oa_unit *oa_unit;
> > + /** @hw_engine_group: the group of hw engines this one belongs to */
> > + struct xe_hw_engine_group *hw_engine_group;
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-22 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-17 13:07 [RFC v1 0/9] Parallel submission of dma fence jobs and LR jobs with shared hardware resources Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 1/9] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Introduce xe_hw_engine_group Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 19:29 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-22 7:40 ` Francois Dugast [this message]
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 2/9] drm/xe/exec_queue: Add list link for the hw engine group Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 19:31 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 3/9] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Register hw engine group's exec queues Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 19:38 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 19:42 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 20:09 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-22 8:17 ` Francois Dugast
2024-07-22 17:50 ` Matthew Brost
2024-08-13 12:24 ` Thomas Hellström
2024-08-15 14:55 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 23:19 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-22 8:31 ` Francois Dugast
2024-07-22 17:47 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 4/9] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Add helper to suspend LR jobs Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 19:49 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 23:09 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 5/9] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Add helper to wait for dma fence jobs Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 20:18 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 6/9] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Ensure safe transition between execution modes Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 22:54 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 7/9] drm/xe/exec: Switch hw engine group execution mode upon job submission Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 22:57 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-18 2:09 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 8/9] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Resume LR exec queues suspended by dma fence jobs Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 23:03 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 9/9] drm/xe/vm: Remove restriction that all VMs must be faulting if one is Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 23:05 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:15 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Parallel submission of dma fence jobs and LR jobs with shared hardware resources Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zp4M8kQaf4wIOqfv@fdugast-desk \
--to=francois.dugast@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox