From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 6/9] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Ensure safe transition between execution modes
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 22:54:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZphLpjXwjWddLTz0@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240717130821.1073379-7-francois.dugast@intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 03:07:27PM +0200, Francois Dugast wrote:
> Provide a way to safely transition execution modes of the hw engine
> group ahead of the actual execution. When necessary, either wait for
> running jobs to complete or preempt them, thus ensuring mutual
> exclusion between modes EXEC_MODE_LR and EXEC_MODE_DMA_FENCE.
>
> Unlike a mutex, the rw_semaphore used in this context allows multiple
> submissions in the same mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h | 3 ++
> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
> index dc75dfe6187a..4f539711357a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
> @@ -1278,3 +1278,70 @@ static int xe_hw_engine_group_wait_for_dma_fence_jobs(struct xe_hw_engine_group
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +static int switch_mode(struct xe_hw_engine_group *group,
> + enum xe_hw_engine_group_execution_mode new_mode)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&group->mode_sem);
lockdep_assert_held_write
> +
> + if (group->cur_mode == new_mode)
> + return 0;
This is redunant as the caller checks this.
> + else if (group->cur_mode == EXEC_MODE_LR && new_mode == EXEC_MODE_DMA_FENCE)
> + err = xe_hw_engine_group_suspend_lr_jobs(group);
> + else if (group->cur_mode == EXEC_MODE_DMA_FENCE && new_mode == EXEC_MODE_LR)
> + err = xe_hw_engine_group_wait_for_dma_fence_jobs(group);
These functions lockdep annotation should be lockdep_assert_held_write too.
> + else
> + err = -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + group->cur_mode = new_mode;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_hw_engine_group_get_mode() - Get the group to execute in the new mode
> + * @group: The hw engine group
> + * @mode: The new execution mode
> + *
> + * Return: 0 if successful, -EINTR if locking failed.
> + */
> +int xe_hw_engine_group_get_mode(struct xe_hw_engine_group *group,
> + enum xe_hw_engine_group_execution_mode mode)
I think you need this annotaion. Unsure if the lock being interruptible
though if this is needed. I'd double check on that.
__acquires(&group->mode_sem);
> +{
> + int err = down_read_interruptible(&group->mode_sem);
> +
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (mode != group->cur_mode) {
> + up_read(&group->mode_sem);
> + err = down_write_killable(&group->mode_sem);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (mode != group->cur_mode) {
> + err = switch_mode(group, mode);
> + if (err) {
> + up_write(&group->mode_sem);
> + return err;
> + }
> + }
> + downgrade_write(&group->mode_sem);
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_hw_engine_group_put() - Put the group
> + * @group: The hw engine group
> + */
> +void xe_hw_engine_group_put(struct xe_hw_engine_group *group)
__releases(&group->mode_sem);
> +{
> + up_read(&group->mode_sem);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h
> index ce59d83a75ad..fce0adf6a7c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h
> @@ -73,5 +73,8 @@ u64 xe_hw_engine_read_timestamp(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe);
>
> int xe_hw_engine_group_add_exec_queue(struct xe_hw_engine_group *group, struct xe_exec_queue *q);
> int xe_hw_engine_group_del_exec_queue(struct xe_hw_engine_group *group, struct xe_exec_queue *q);
> +int xe_hw_engine_group_get_mode(struct xe_hw_engine_group *group,
> + enum xe_hw_engine_group_execution_mode mode);
Maybe consider putting these function in there own files:
xe_hw_engine_group.h
xe_hw_engine_group_types.h
xe_hw_engine_group.c
Matt
> +void xe_hw_engine_group_put(struct xe_hw_engine_group *group);
>
> #endif
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-17 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-17 13:07 [RFC v1 0/9] Parallel submission of dma fence jobs and LR jobs with shared hardware resources Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 1/9] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Introduce xe_hw_engine_group Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 19:29 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-22 7:40 ` Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 2/9] drm/xe/exec_queue: Add list link for the hw engine group Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 19:31 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 3/9] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Register hw engine group's exec queues Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 19:38 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 19:42 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 20:09 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-22 8:17 ` Francois Dugast
2024-07-22 17:50 ` Matthew Brost
2024-08-13 12:24 ` Thomas Hellström
2024-08-15 14:55 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 23:19 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-22 8:31 ` Francois Dugast
2024-07-22 17:47 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 4/9] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Add helper to suspend LR jobs Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 19:49 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 23:09 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 5/9] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Add helper to wait for dma fence jobs Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 20:18 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 6/9] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Ensure safe transition between execution modes Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 22:54 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 7/9] drm/xe/exec: Switch hw engine group execution mode upon job submission Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 22:57 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-18 2:09 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 8/9] drm/xe/hw_engine_group: Resume LR exec queues suspended by dma fence jobs Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 23:03 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC v1 9/9] drm/xe/vm: Remove restriction that all VMs must be faulting if one is Francois Dugast
2024-07-17 23:05 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-17 13:15 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Parallel submission of dma fence jobs and LR jobs with shared hardware resources Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZphLpjXwjWddLTz0@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox