From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: Restore pci state upon resume
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:01:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuQbnRfh-wkuMR83@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240912190530.435976-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 03:05:30PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> The pci state was saved, but not restored. Restore
> right after the power state transition request like
> every other driver.
>
> Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> index 5ba4ec229494..6d29ef4b396f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> @@ -949,6 +949,8 @@ static int xe_pci_resume(struct device *dev)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + pci_restore_state(pdev);
Why is xe even doing this stuff by hand instead of letting
the pci core handle it?
> +
> err = pci_enable_device(pdev);
> if (err)
> return err;
> --
> 2.46.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-13 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-12 19:05 [PATCH] drm/xe: Restore pci state upon resume Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-12 19:47 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-09-12 20:05 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-09-12 20:05 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-09-12 20:07 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-09-12 20:11 ` [PATCH] " Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-12 21:20 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-12 21:40 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-17 21:37 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-09-12 20:18 ` ✓ CI.Build: success for " Patchwork
2024-09-12 20:21 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-12 20:22 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-09-12 20:37 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-09-13 11:01 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-09-13 15:43 ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-13 15:50 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2024-09-13 16:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-17 18:49 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-17 21:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-19 22:10 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-20 10:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-13 14:10 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure for " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-09-12 21:45 [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZuQbnRfh-wkuMR83@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox