From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe/guc: Don't read data from G2H prior to length check
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:36:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZypzyPc1W/BX9ESg@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241105173032.1947-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 06:30:31PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> While highly unlikely, incoming G2H message might be too short
> so we shouldn't read any data from it prior to checking a length.
>
Is this really needed though? The *msg is a per CT member:
xe_guc_ct_types.h
147 /** @msg: Message buffer */
148 u32 msg[GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN];
149 /** @fast_msg: Message buffer */
150 u32 fast_msg[GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN];
I suppose this good practice but this is not an actual problem though, right?
Matt
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 4481890be941..147000fd1177 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -1885,12 +1885,14 @@ static void handle_sched_done(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> int xe_guc_sched_done_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len)
> {
> struct xe_exec_queue *q;
> - u32 guc_id = msg[0];
> - u32 runnable_state = msg[1];
> + u32 guc_id, runnable_state;
>
> if (unlikely(len < 2))
> return -EPROTO;
>
> + guc_id = msg[0];
> + runnable_state = msg[1];
> +
> q = g2h_exec_queue_lookup(guc, guc_id);
> if (unlikely(!q))
> return -EPROTO;
> @@ -1924,11 +1926,13 @@ static void handle_deregister_done(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> int xe_guc_deregister_done_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len)
> {
> struct xe_exec_queue *q;
> - u32 guc_id = msg[0];
> + u32 guc_id;
>
> if (unlikely(len < 1))
> return -EPROTO;
>
> + guc_id = msg[0];
> +
> q = g2h_exec_queue_lookup(guc, guc_id);
> if (unlikely(!q))
> return -EPROTO;
> @@ -1950,11 +1954,13 @@ int xe_guc_exec_queue_reset_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len)
> {
> struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> struct xe_exec_queue *q;
> - u32 guc_id = msg[0];
> + u32 guc_id;
>
> if (unlikely(len < 1))
> return -EPROTO;
>
> + guc_id = msg[0];
> +
> q = g2h_exec_queue_lookup(guc, guc_id);
> if (unlikely(!q))
> return -EPROTO;
> @@ -2010,11 +2016,13 @@ int xe_guc_exec_queue_memory_cat_error_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg,
> {
> struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
> struct xe_exec_queue *q;
> - u32 guc_id = msg[0];
> + u32 guc_id;
>
> if (unlikely(len < 1))
> return -EPROTO;
>
> + guc_id = msg[0];
> +
> q = g2h_exec_queue_lookup(guc, guc_id);
> if (unlikely(!q))
> return -EPROTO;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-05 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-05 17:30 [PATCH 0/4] GuC: Improve handling of the malformed G2H Michal Wajdeczko
2024-11-05 17:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe/guc: Log content of the failed G2H message Michal Wajdeczko
2024-11-05 19:30 ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-05 17:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/xe/guc: Drop redundant logs about invalid G2H length Michal Wajdeczko
2024-11-05 19:31 ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-05 17:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe/guc: Don't read data from G2H prior to length check Michal Wajdeczko
2024-11-05 19:36 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-11-05 20:01 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-11-06 1:32 ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-05 17:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe/guc: Don't treat GuC generic CAT error as protocol error Michal Wajdeczko
2024-11-05 20:13 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-11-05 20:45 ` [PATCH v2 " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-11-06 1:24 ` Matthew Brost
2024-11-05 17:38 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for GuC: Improve handling of the malformed G2H Patchwork
2024-11-05 17:38 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-11-05 17:39 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-11-05 17:52 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-05 17:54 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-11-05 17:56 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-11-05 18:37 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-11-05 20:51 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for GuC: Improve handling of the malformed G2H (rev2) Patchwork
2024-11-05 20:52 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-11-05 20:53 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-11-05 21:04 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-05 21:07 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-11-05 21:08 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-11-05 21:36 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-11-06 22:55 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure for GuC: Improve handling of the malformed G2H Patchwork
2024-11-07 1:06 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure for GuC: Improve handling of the malformed G2H (rev2) Patchwork
2024-11-07 9:21 ` Michal Wajdeczko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZypzyPc1W/BX9ESg@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox