From: "Tauro, Riana" <riana.tauro@intel.com>
To: "Mallesh, Koujalagi" <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
<rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, <aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com>,
<badal.nilawar@intel.com>, <raag.jadav@intel.com>,
<ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com>, <soham.purkait@intel.com>,
"Michal Wajdeczko" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] drm/xe/xe_pci_error: Implement PCI error recovery callbacks
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 10:18:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4946e09-bdde-4a9b-b9e0-d494698a3469@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c36cdb7a-b8ad-496c-bf1c-61ec15c5ac29@intel.com>
On 4/14/2026 6:59 PM, Mallesh, Koujalagi wrote:
>
> On 13-04-2026 02:30 pm, Tauro, Riana wrote:
>>
>> On 4/7/2026 10:20 AM, Matthew Brost wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 12:31:33PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
>>>> Add error_detected, mmio_enabled, slot_reset and resume
>>>> recovery callbacks to handle PCIe Advanced Error Reporting
>>>> (AER) errors.
>>>>
>>>> For fatal errors, the device is wedged and becomes
>>>> inaccessible. Return PCI_ERS_RESULT_SLOT_RESET from
>>>> error_detected to request a Secondary Bus Reset (SBR).
>>>>
>>>> For non-fatal errors, return PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER from
>>>> error_detected to trigger the mmio_enabled callback. In this callback,
>>>> the device is queried to determine the error cause and attempt
>>>> recovery based on the error type.
>>>>
>>>> Once the secondary bus reset(SBR) is completed the slot_reset callback
>>>> cleanly removes and reprobe the device to restore functionality.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: re-order linux headers
>>>> reword error messages
>>>> do not clear in_recovery after remove
>>>> return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT if probe fails (Michal)
>>>> only wedge device do not send uevent (Raag)
>>>> set recovery flag in error_detected and clear on resume
>>>> add default switch case (Mallesh)
>>>>
>>>> v3: do not set in_recovery for disconnect (Mallesh)
>>>> return if already wedged or in survivability mode
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 1 +
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h | 15 ++++
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 3 +
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 3 +
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c | 104
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
>>>> index 9dacb0579a7d..7f03f06df186 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
>>>> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
>>>> xe_page_reclaim.o \
>>>> xe_pat.o \
>>>> xe_pci.o \
>>>> + xe_pci_error.o \
>>>> xe_pci_rebar.o \
>>>> xe_pcode.o \
>>>> xe_pm.o \
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
>>>> index e4b9de8d8e95..60db2492cb92 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
>>>> @@ -43,6 +43,21 @@ static inline struct xe_device
>>>> *ttm_to_xe_device(struct ttm_device *ttm)
>>>> return container_of(ttm, struct xe_device, ttm);
>>>> }
>>>> +static inline bool xe_device_is_in_recovery(struct xe_device *xe)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return atomic_read(&xe->in_recovery);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline void xe_device_set_in_recovery(struct xe_device *xe)
>>>> +{
>>>> + atomic_set(&xe->in_recovery, 1);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline void xe_device_clear_in_recovery(struct xe_device *xe)
>>>> +{
>>>> + atomic_set(&xe->in_recovery, 0);
> nit: Remove white space
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> struct xe_device *xe_device_create(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>> const struct pci_device_id *ent);
>>>> int xe_device_probe_early(struct xe_device *xe);
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>>> index 150c76b2acaf..c9fe86b670bd 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>>> @@ -494,6 +494,9 @@ struct xe_device {
>>>> bool inconsistent_reset;
>>>> } wedged;
>>>> + /** @in_recovery: Indicates if device is in recovery */
>>>> + atomic_t in_recovery;
>>>> +
>>>> /** @bo_device: Struct to control async free of BOs */
>>>> struct xe_bo_dev {
>>>> /** @bo_device.async_free: Free worker */
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>>>> index 1df3f08e2e1c..30d71795dd2e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>>>> @@ -1323,6 +1323,8 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops xe_pm_ops = {
>>>> };
>>>> #endif
>>>> +extern const struct pci_error_handlers xe_pci_error_handlers;
>>>> +
>>>> static struct pci_driver xe_pci_driver = {
>>>> .name = DRIVER_NAME,
>>>> .id_table = pciidlist,
>>>> @@ -1330,6 +1332,7 @@ static struct pci_driver xe_pci_driver = {
>>>> .remove = xe_pci_remove,
>>>> .shutdown = xe_pci_shutdown,
>>>> .sriov_configure = xe_pci_sriov_configure,
>>>> + .err_handler = &xe_pci_error_handlers,
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>>> .driver.pm = &xe_pm_ops,
>>>> #endif
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..cd9f39010278
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_error.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
>>>> + */
>>>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include "xe_device.h"
>>>> +#include "xe_gt.h"
>>>> +#include "xe_pci.h"
>>>> +#include "xe_survivability_mode.h"
>>>> +#include "xe_uc.h"
>>>> +
>>>> +static void xe_pci_error_handling(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
>>>> + struct xe_gt *gt;
>>>> + u8 id;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Return if device is wedged or in survivability mode */
>>>> + if (xe_survivability_mode_is_boot_enabled(xe) ||
>>>> xe_device_wedged(xe))
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Wedge the device to prevent userspace access but don't send
>>>> the event yet */
>>>> + atomic_set(&xe->wedged.flag, 1);
>>> We can't blindly set '&xe->wedged.flag, 1' as this is tied to a PM ref
>>> [1], [2]. The existing sematic might be wrong but we to normalize
>>> adjustmets to the '&xe->wedged.flag' field with uniform rules, or the
>>> cases when we wedge we also take a PM ref
>>>
>>
>> If the device was already wedged from xe_device_declare_wedged, this
>> function returns.
>> And the ref is released in fini.
>>
>> PM ref was added to prevent runtime suspend during wedging. But in
>> case of error_callbacks
>> this is already taken by PCI core drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
>>
>> pci_walk_bridge(bridge, pci_pm_runtime_get_sync, NULL);
>>
>> I will add a comment here.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Riana
>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/714622/?series=163948&rev=1
>>> [2]
>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/715028/?series=162055&rev=4#comment_1315905
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
>>>> + xe_gt_declare_wedged(gt);
>>>> +
>>>> + pci_disable_device(pdev);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static pci_ers_result_t xe_pci_error_detected(struct pci_dev
>>>> *pdev, pci_channel_state_t state)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Xe Pci error recovery: error detected
>>>> state %d\n", state);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (state == pci_channel_io_perm_failure)
>>>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
>>>> +
>>>> + xe_device_set_in_recovery(xe);
>>>> +
>>>> + switch (state) {
>>>> + case pci_channel_io_normal:
>>>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER;
>>>> + case pci_channel_io_frozen:
>>>> + xe_pci_error_handling(pdev);
>>>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET;
>>>> + default:
>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unknown state %d\n", state);
>>>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET;
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static pci_ers_result_t xe_pci_error_mmio_enabled(struct pci_dev
>>>> *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Xe Pci error recovery: MMIO enabled\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static pci_ers_result_t xe_pci_error_slot_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + const struct pci_device_id *ent =
>>>> pci_match_id(pdev->driver->id_table, pdev);
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Xe Pci error recovery: Slot reset\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + pci_restore_state(pdev);
>
> Is pci_restore_state() needed here? before invoking slot_reset, the
> PCI core already calls
I have already responded to this in v1. [2/8] drm/xe/xe_pci_error:
Implement PCI error recovery callbacks - Patchwork
<https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/700296/?series=160482&rev=1>.
We have seen issues if we don't restore it after SBR. Maybe i missed
something.
Can you please point to the line of code? I don't see it in
report_slot_reset or aer_root_reset.
err.c - drivers/pci/pcie/err.c - Linux source code v7.0 - Bootlin Elixir
Cross Referencer
<https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.0/source/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c#L148>Thanks
Riana
>
> pci_restore_state() right.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -/Mallesh
>
>>>> +
>>>> + if (pci_enable_device(pdev)) {
>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>>>> + "Cannot re-enable PCI device after reset\n");
>>>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Secondary Bus Reset wipes out all device memory
>>>> + * requiring XE KMD to perform a device removal and reprobe.
>>>> + */
>>>> + pdev->driver->remove(pdev);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!pdev->driver->probe(pdev, ent))
>>>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
>>>> +
>>>> + return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void xe_pci_error_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Xe Pci error recovery: Recovered\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + xe_device_clear_in_recovery(xe);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +const struct pci_error_handlers xe_pci_error_handlers = {
>>>> + .error_detected = xe_pci_error_detected,
>>>> + .mmio_enabled = xe_pci_error_mmio_enabled,
>>>> + .slot_reset = xe_pci_error_slot_reset,
>>>> + .resume = xe_pci_error_resume,
>>>> +};
>>>> --
>>>> 2.47.1
>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-16 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-02 7:01 [PATCH v3 00/10] Introduce Xe Uncorrectable Error Handling Riana Tauro
2026-04-02 7:01 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] drm/xe/xe_survivability: Decouple survivability info from boot survivability Riana Tauro
2026-04-14 12:15 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-04-02 7:01 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] drm/xe/xe_pci_error: Implement PCI error recovery callbacks Riana Tauro
2026-04-07 4:50 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-13 9:00 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-04-14 13:29 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-04-16 4:48 ` Tauro, Riana [this message]
2026-04-16 5:33 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-04-02 7:01 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] drm/xe/xe_pci_error: Group all devres to release them on PCIe slot reset Riana Tauro
2026-04-16 13:07 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-04-02 7:01 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] drm/xe: Skip device access during PCI error recovery Riana Tauro
2026-04-02 7:01 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] drm/xe/xe_ras: Initialize Uncorrectable AER Registers Riana Tauro
2026-04-07 5:50 ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-02 7:01 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/xe/xe_ras: Add structures and commands for Uncorrectable Core Compute Errors Riana Tauro
2026-04-07 5:59 ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-02 7:01 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] drm/xe/xe_ras: Add support for Uncorrectable Core-Compute errors Riana Tauro
2026-04-08 11:15 ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-13 8:17 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-04-02 7:01 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] drm/xe/xe_ras: Add structures for SoC Internal errors Riana Tauro
2026-04-08 11:18 ` Raag Jadav
2026-04-13 7:55 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-04-02 7:01 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] drm/xe/xe_ras: Handle Uncorrectable " Riana Tauro
2026-04-02 7:01 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] drm/xe/xe_pci_error: Process errors in mmio_enabled Riana Tauro
2026-04-02 8:01 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce Xe Uncorrectable Error Handling (rev3) Patchwork
2026-04-02 8:02 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-04-02 8:50 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-02 15:08 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a4946e09-bdde-4a9b-b9e0-d494698a3469@intel.com \
--to=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=soham.purkait@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox