From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/20] drm/xe: Allow CPU address mirror VMA unbind with gpu bindings for madvise
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 22:52:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFjrgNVdY6rOPezk@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250613125558.2607665-12-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 06:25:49PM +0530, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> In the case of the MADVISE ioctl, if the start or end addresses fall
> within a VMA and existing SVM ranges are present, remove the existing
> SVM mappings. Then, continue with ops_parse to create new VMAs by REMAP
> unmapping of old one.
>
> v2 (Matthew Brost)
> - Use vops flag to call unmapping of ranges in vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse
> - Rename the function
>
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h | 8 ++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 8 ++++++--
> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> index 19420635f1fa..df6992ee2e2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> @@ -935,6 +935,33 @@ bool xe_svm_has_mapping(struct xe_vm *vm, u64 start, u64 end)
> return drm_gpusvm_has_mapping(&vm->svm.gpusvm, start, end);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * xe_svm_unmap_address_range - UNMAP SVM mappings and ranges
> + * @start: start addr
> + * @end: end addr
> + *
> + * This function UNMAPS svm ranges if start or end address are inside them.
> + */
> +void xe_svm_unmap_address_range(struct xe_vm *vm, u64 start, u64 end)
> +{
> + struct drm_gpusvm_notifier *notifier, *next;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held_write(&vm->lock);
> +
> + drm_gpusvm_for_each_notifier_safe(notifier, next, &vm->svm.gpusvm, start, end) {
> + struct drm_gpusvm_range *range, *__next;
> +
> + drm_gpusvm_for_each_range_safe(range, __next, notifier, start, end) {
> + if (start > drm_gpusvm_range_start(range) ||
> + end < drm_gpusvm_range_end(range)) {
> + if (IS_DGFX(vm->xe) && xe_svm_range_in_vram(to_xe_range(range)))
> + drm_gpusvm_range_evict(&vm->svm.gpusvm, range);
I think you could use xe_svm_range_migrate_to_smem here but also I don't
eviction is strickly required here either. This akin to a partial unmap
and we don't evict there. Any reason that I'm missing here?
Matt
> + __xe_svm_garbage_collector(vm, to_xe_range(range));
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> /**
> * xe_svm_bo_evict() - SVM evict BO to system memory
> * @bo: BO to evict
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> index af8f285b6caa..4e5d42323679 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ bool xe_svm_range_validate(struct xe_vm *vm,
> u64 xe_svm_find_vma_start(struct xe_vm *vm, u64 addr, u64 end, struct xe_vma *vma);
>
> u8 xe_svm_ranges_zap_ptes_in_range(struct xe_vm *vm, u64 start, u64 end);
> +
> +void xe_svm_unmap_address_range(struct xe_vm *vm, u64 start, u64 end);
> +
> /**
> * xe_svm_range_has_dma_mapping() - SVM range has DMA mapping
> * @range: SVM range
> @@ -312,6 +315,11 @@ u8 xe_svm_ranges_zap_ptes_in_range(struct xe_vm *vm, u64 start, u64 end)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline
> +void xe_svm_unmap_address_range(struct xe_vm *vm, u64 start, u64 end)
> +{
> +}
> +
> #define xe_svm_assert_in_notifier(...) do {} while (0)
> #define xe_svm_range_has_dma_mapping(...) false
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index e059d9810d26..0872df8d0b15 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -2663,8 +2663,12 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
> end = op->base.remap.next->va.addr;
>
> if (xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(old) &&
> - xe_svm_has_mapping(vm, start, end))
> - return -EBUSY;
> + xe_svm_has_mapping(vm, start, end)) {
> + if (vops->flags & XE_VMA_OPS_FLAG_MADVISE)
> + xe_svm_unmap_address_range(vm, start, end);
> + else
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
>
> op->remap.start = xe_vma_start(old);
> op->remap.range = xe_vma_size(old);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-23 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-13 12:55 [PATCH v4 00/20] MADVISE FOR XE Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-13 12:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for MADVISE FOR XE (rev2) Patchwork
2025-06-13 12:44 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 01/20] Introduce drm_gpuvm_sm_map_ops_flags enums for sm_map_ops Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 02/20] drm/xe/uapi: Add madvise interface Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-13 14:15 ` Souza, Jose
2025-06-23 4:30 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-23 6:20 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-06-27 13:47 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-06-27 14:29 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-06-27 18:13 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 03/20] drm/xe/vm: Add attributes struct as member of vma Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-23 4:18 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-23 6:21 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-06-27 14:32 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 04/20] drm/xe/vma: Move pat_index to vma attributes Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 05/20] drm/xe/vma: Modify new_vma to accept struct xe_vma_mem_attr as parameter Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-23 4:38 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-23 16:21 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 06/20] drm/gpusvm: Make drm_gpusvm_for_each_* macros public Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 07/20] drm/xe/svm: Split system allocator vma incase of madvise call Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 08/20] drm/xe/svm: Add xe_svm_ranges_zap_ptes_in_range() for PTE zapping Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-23 4:56 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-23 6:25 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 09/20] drm/xe: Implement madvise ioctl for xe Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-23 5:33 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-26 6:04 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2025-06-26 6:15 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-26 8:36 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-06-26 8:34 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 10/20] drm/xe/vm: Add an identifier for madvise in xe_vma_ops Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-23 5:38 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-23 6:28 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 11/20] drm/xe: Allow CPU address mirror VMA unbind with gpu bindings for madvise Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-14 4:31 ` kernel test robot
2025-06-23 5:52 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-06-23 6:18 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-06-23 11:45 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 12/20] drm/xe/svm : Add svm ranges migration policy on atomic access Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-23 16:32 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 13/20] drm/xe/madvise: Update migration policy based on preferred location Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-13 23:31 ` kernel test robot
2025-06-14 5:33 ` kernel test robot
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 14/20] drm/xe/svm: Support DRM_XE_SVM_ATTR_PAT memory attribute Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-23 16:34 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 15/20] drm/xe/uapi: Add flag for consulting madvise hints on svm prefetch Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-23 16:36 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 16/20] drm/xe/svm: Consult madvise preferred location in prefetch Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-23 22:07 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 17/20] drm/xe/bo: Add attributes field to xe_bo Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 18/20] drm/xe/bo: Update atomic_access attribute on madvise Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-23 16:19 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 19/20] drm/xe/uapi: Add UAPI for querying VMA count and memory attributes Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-23 22:43 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-24 2:18 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-27 13:20 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-06-27 13:43 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-06-26 3:44 ` Lin, Shuicheng
2025-06-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 20/20] drm/xe/madvise: Skip vma invalidation if mem attr are unchanged Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2025-06-23 22:28 ` Matthew Brost
2025-06-26 8:54 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2025-06-16 4:30 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for MADVISE FOR XE (rev3) Patchwork
2025-06-16 4:31 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-06-16 4:45 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-06-16 5:13 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-06-16 15:06 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-07-29 4:41 ` [PATCH v4 00/20] MADVISE FOR XE Matthew Brost
2025-07-30 11:16 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFjrgNVdY6rOPezk@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox