From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/12] drm/xe: Improve xe_gt_sriov_pf_config GGTT handling
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:04:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPAahQy4TpYsFV2S@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015074708.1654014-20-dev@lankhorst.se>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 09:47:15AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Do not directly dereference xe_ggtt_node, and add
> a member to store the GGTT size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_types.h | 8 ++++++--
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> index 2289756761636..c0dfffd5c553b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config.c
> @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static u32 encode_config_ggtt(u32 *cfg, const struct xe_gt_sriov_config *config,
> if (!xe_ggtt_node_allocated(node))
> return 0;
>
> - return encode_ggtt(cfg, node->base.start, node->base.size, details);
> + return encode_ggtt(cfg, xe_ggtt_node_addr(node), config->ggtt_size, details);
> }
>
> /* Return: number of configuration dwords written */
> @@ -495,13 +495,14 @@ static int pf_provision_vf_ggtt(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int vfid, u64 size)
>
> xe_ggtt_assign(node, vfid);
> xe_gt_sriov_dbg_verbose(gt, "VF%u assigned GGTT %llx-%llx\n",
> - vfid, node->base.start, node->base.start + node->base.size - 1);
> + vfid, xe_ggtt_node_addr(node), xe_ggtt_node_addr(node) + size - 1);
>
> - err = pf_distribute_config_ggtt(gt->tile, vfid, node->base.start, node->base.size);
> + err = pf_distribute_config_ggtt(gt->tile, vfid, xe_ggtt_node_addr(node), size);
> if (unlikely(err))
> goto err;
>
> config->ggtt_region = node;
> + config->ggtt_size = size;
> return 0;
> err:
> pf_release_ggtt(tile, node);
> @@ -514,7 +515,7 @@ static u64 pf_get_vf_config_ggtt(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int vfid)
> struct xe_ggtt_node *node = config->ggtt_region;
>
> xe_gt_assert(gt, xe_gt_is_main_type(gt));
> - return xe_ggtt_node_allocated(node) ? node->base.size : 0;
> + return xe_ggtt_node_allocated(node) ? config->ggtt_size : 0;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -2516,11 +2517,11 @@ int xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_print_ggtt(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
> if (!xe_ggtt_node_allocated(config->ggtt_region))
> continue;
>
> - string_get_size(config->ggtt_region->base.size, 1, STRING_UNITS_2,
> + string_get_size(config->ggtt_size, 1, STRING_UNITS_2,
> buf, sizeof(buf));
> drm_printf(p, "VF%u:\t%#0llx-%#llx\t(%s)\n",
> - n, config->ggtt_region->base.start,
> - config->ggtt_region->base.start + config->ggtt_region->base.size - 1,
> + n, xe_ggtt_node_addr(config->ggtt_region),
> + xe_ggtt_node_addr(config->ggtt_region) + config->ggtt_size - 1,
> buf);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_types.h
> index 686c7b3b6d7a5..9a8e66c8b539f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_config_types.h
> @@ -17,10 +17,14 @@ struct xe_bo;
> * Used by the PF driver to maintain per-VF provisioning data.
> */
> struct xe_gt_sriov_config {
> - /** @ggtt_region: GGTT region assigned to the VF. */
> - struct xe_ggtt_node *ggtt_region;
> /** @lmem_obj: LMEM allocation for use by the VF. */
> struct xe_bo *lmem_obj;
> +
> + /** @ggtt_region: GGTT region assigned to the VF. */
> + struct xe_ggtt_node *ggtt_region;
> + /** @ggtt_size: Size of GGTT region */
> + u64 ggtt_size;
Nit: Couldn't we have a helper to dervive the size from the
xe_ggtt_node to avoid storing the ggtt_size explicitly?
> +
Longterm we should likely move the PF GGTT config to a per-tile
structure like we did for the VF GGTT config. IMO we can do that in
follow up. Maybe ping Michal for his thoughts here.
Anyways, this looks like a good cleanup for the existing code structure.
With that:
Reviewed-by: <Matthew.brost@intel.com>
> /** @num_ctxs: number of GuC contexts IDs. */
> u16 num_ctxs;
> /** @begin_ctx: start index of GuC context ID range. */
> --
> 2.51.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 7:47 [PATCH v7 00/12] drm/xe: Make all xe_ggtt structs private Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-15 7:47 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] drm/xe: Start using ggtt->start in preparation of balloon removal Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-15 7:47 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] drm/xe: Convert xe_fb_pin to use a callback for insertion into GGTT Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-15 7:47 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] drm/xe: Add xe_ggtt_node_addr() to avoid dereferencing xe_ggtt_node Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-15 21:49 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-16 6:13 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-17 20:53 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-15 7:47 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] drm/xe/display: Avoid " Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-15 21:53 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-15 7:47 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] drm/xe: Do not dereference ggtt_node in xe_bo.c Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-15 21:58 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-16 6:33 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-17 20:54 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-15 7:47 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] drm/xe: Improve xe_gt_sriov_pf_config GGTT handling Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-15 22:04 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-10-16 8:50 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-16 13:46 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-16 13:58 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-15 7:47 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] drm/xe: Privatize xe_ggtt_node Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-15 22:05 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-15 7:47 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] drm/xe: Make xe_ggtt_node offset relative to starting offset Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-15 22:38 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-16 6:40 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-15 7:47 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] drm/xe: Rewrite GGTT VF initialisation Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-16 0:30 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-15 7:47 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] drm/xe: Move struct xe_ggtt to xe_ggtt.c Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-15 7:47 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] drm/xe: Make xe_ggtt_node_insert return a node Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-15 22:44 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-15 7:47 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] drm/xe: Remove xe_ggtt_node_allocated Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-15 22:41 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-15 9:47 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Make all xe_ggtt structs private. (rev2) Patchwork
2025-10-15 9:49 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-15 11:03 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-15 19:55 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPAahQy4TpYsFV2S@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox