From: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
To: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/xe/oa: Use explicit struct initialization for struct xe_oa_regs
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:41:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aSdJ4RgxATlFcZfH@soc-5CG1426VCC.clients.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251126035220.13089-2-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 07:52:16PM -0800, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
>Use explicit struct initialization for struct xe_oa_regs to reduce chance
>of error. Also add .oa_mmio_trg field to struct for completeness.
>
>Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Makes it more readable as well. Thanks for adding this,
Reviewed-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
>index 890c363282ae6..75db5530cb557 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
>@@ -2566,30 +2566,32 @@ static u32 __hwe_oa_unit(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe)
> static struct xe_oa_regs __oam_regs(u32 base)
> {
> return (struct xe_oa_regs) {
>- base,
>- OAM_HEAD_POINTER(base),
>- OAM_TAIL_POINTER(base),
>- OAM_BUFFER(base),
>- OAM_CONTEXT_CONTROL(base),
>- OAM_CONTROL(base),
>- OAM_DEBUG(base),
>- OAM_STATUS(base),
>- OAM_CONTROL_COUNTER_SEL_MASK,
>+ .base = base,
>+ .oa_head_ptr = OAM_HEAD_POINTER(base),
>+ .oa_tail_ptr = OAM_TAIL_POINTER(base),
>+ .oa_buffer = OAM_BUFFER(base),
>+ .oa_ctx_ctrl = OAM_CONTEXT_CONTROL(base),
>+ .oa_ctrl = OAM_CONTROL(base),
>+ .oa_debug = OAM_DEBUG(base),
>+ .oa_status = OAM_STATUS(base),
>+ .oa_mmio_trg = OAM_MMIO_TRG(base),
>+ .oa_ctrl_counter_select_mask = OAM_CONTROL_COUNTER_SEL_MASK,
> };
> }
>
> static struct xe_oa_regs __oag_regs(void)
> {
> return (struct xe_oa_regs) {
>- 0,
>- OAG_OAHEADPTR,
>- OAG_OATAILPTR,
>- OAG_OABUFFER,
>- OAG_OAGLBCTXCTRL,
>- OAG_OACONTROL,
>- OAG_OA_DEBUG,
>- OAG_OASTATUS,
>- OAG_OACONTROL_OA_COUNTER_SEL_MASK,
>+ .base = 0,
>+ .oa_head_ptr = OAG_OAHEADPTR,
>+ .oa_tail_ptr = OAG_OATAILPTR,
>+ .oa_buffer = OAG_OABUFFER,
>+ .oa_ctx_ctrl = OAG_OAGLBCTXCTRL,
>+ .oa_ctrl = OAG_OACONTROL,
>+ .oa_debug = OAG_OA_DEBUG,
>+ .oa_status = OAG_OASTATUS,
>+ .oa_mmio_trg = OAG_MMIOTRIGGER,
>+ .oa_ctrl_counter_select_mask = OAG_OACONTROL_OA_COUNTER_SEL_MASK,
> };
> }
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h
>index cf080f4121893..08cc8d7c22158 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h
>@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct xe_oa_regs {
> struct xe_reg oa_ctrl;
> struct xe_reg oa_debug;
> struct xe_reg oa_status;
>+ struct xe_reg oa_mmio_trg;
> u32 oa_ctrl_counter_select_mask;
> };
>
>--
>2.48.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-26 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-26 3:52 [PATCH 0/5] OA: More OA and register whitelist changes Ashutosh Dixit
2025-11-26 3:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/xe/oa: Use explicit struct initialization for struct xe_oa_regs Ashutosh Dixit
2025-11-26 18:41 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa [this message]
2025-11-26 3:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/xe/oa/uapi: Add gt_id to struct drm_xe_oa_unit Ashutosh Dixit
2025-11-26 20:14 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-11-26 20:42 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-26 23:08 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-12-01 18:01 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-11-26 3:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/xe/oa: Allow exec_queue's to be specified only for OAG OA unit Ashutosh Dixit
2025-11-26 20:15 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-11-26 3:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/xe/rtp: Refactor OAG MMIO trigger register whitelisting Ashutosh Dixit
2025-11-26 21:49 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-11-26 3:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/xe/rtp: Whitelist OAM MMIO trigger registers Ashutosh Dixit
2025-11-26 21:53 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-11-26 5:35 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for OA: More OA and register whitelist changes Patchwork
2025-11-26 5:36 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-26 6:14 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-26 9:02 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-12-02 2:51 [PATCH v2 0/5] " Ashutosh Dixit
2025-12-02 2:51 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/xe/oa: Use explicit struct initialization for struct xe_oa_regs Ashutosh Dixit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aSdJ4RgxATlFcZfH@soc-5CG1426VCC.clients.intel.com \
--to=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox