From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Jan Maslak <jan.maslak@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <maciej.patelczyk@intel.com>,
<joonas.lahtinen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/xe: Restore engine registers before restarting schedulers after GT reset
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 12:36:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTNCY3LFsqgy9My5@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251205045529.3801762-2-jan.maslak@intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 05:55:29AM +0100, Jan Maslak wrote:
> During GT reset recovery in do_gt_restart(), xe_uc_start() was called
> before xe_reg_sr_apply_mmio() restored engine-specific registers. This
> created a race window where the scheduler could run jobs before hardware
> state was fully restored.
>
> This caused failures in eudebug tests (xe_exec_sip_eudebug@breakpoint-
> waitsip-*) where TD_CTL register (containing TD_CTL_GLOBAL_DEBUG_ENABLE)
> wasn't restored before jobs started executing. Breakpoints would fail to
> trigger SIP entry because the debug enable bit wasn't set yet.
>
> Fix by moving engine register restoration before xe_uc_start(), ensuring
> all hardware state is fully restored before any jobs can be scheduled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Maslak <jan.maslak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index 7caf781ba9e8..17642d71f98f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> @@ -771,13 +771,14 @@ static int do_gt_restart(struct xe_gt *gt)
> xe_gt_sriov_pf_init_hw(gt);
>
> xe_mocs_init(gt);
> - err = xe_uc_start(>->uc);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
>
> for_each_hw_engine(hwe, gt, id)
> xe_reg_sr_apply_mmio(&hwe->reg_sr, gt);
>
> + err = xe_uc_start(>->uc);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> /* Get CCS mode in sync between sw/hw */
> xe_gt_apply_ccs_mode(gt);
>
I think you need to move this xe_gt_apply_ccs_mode as that is also
writing MMIO registers that should be configured before bring the chip
back to a live state.
Also I think you need a fixes tag here as this is pretty clearly a
bug.
Matt
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-05 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-05 4:55 [PATCH 0/1] drm/xe: Restore engine registers before restarting schedulers after GT reset Jan Maslak
2025-12-05 4:55 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Jan Maslak
2025-12-05 20:36 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-12-05 20:37 ` Matthew Brost
2025-12-05 5:18 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2025-12-05 6:20 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-05 7:11 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-12-10 14:56 [PATCH 0/1] " Jan Maslak
2025-12-10 14:56 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Jan Maslak
2025-12-10 18:25 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-12-10 18:47 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTNCY3LFsqgy9My5@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jan.maslak@intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@intel.com \
--cc=maciej.patelczyk@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox