public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
	<badal.nilawar@intel.com>, <sk.anirban@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] drm/xe/guc: Make xe_guc_pc_stop() void
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:46:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aejDDi4gS50ukqJz@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260422121128.1002031-2-raag.jadav@intel.com>

On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 05:40:56PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> xe_guc_pc_stop() doesn't return any meaningful value. Refactor it into
> void function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c    |  9 ++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 10 ++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index 1355b68d3fce..ec291588c482 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> @@ -1730,13 +1730,8 @@ void xe_guc_reset_wait(struct xe_guc *guc)
>  
>  void xe_guc_stop_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc)
>  {
> -	if (!IS_SRIOV_VF(guc_to_xe(guc))) {
> -		int err;
> -
> -		err = xe_guc_pc_stop(&guc->pc);
> -		xe_gt_WARN(guc_to_gt(guc), err, "Failed to stop GuC PC: %pe\n",
> -			   ERR_PTR(err));
> -	}
> +	if (!IS_SRIOV_VF(guc_to_xe(guc)))
> +		xe_guc_pc_stop(&guc->pc);
>  }
>  
>  void xe_guc_stop(struct xe_guc *guc)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> index 7ecd91ad6192..59f2fa79ad42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> @@ -1316,18 +1316,16 @@ int xe_guc_pc_start(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>   * xe_guc_pc_stop - Stop GuC's Power Conservation component
>   * @pc: Xe_GuC_PC instance
>   */
> -int xe_guc_pc_stop(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> +void xe_guc_pc_stop(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>  {
>  	struct xe_device *xe = pc_to_xe(pc);
>  
>  	if (xe->info.skip_guc_pc)
> -		return 0;
> +		return;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&pc->freq_lock);
>  	pc->freq_ready = false;
>  	mutex_unlock(&pc->freq_lock);
> -
> -	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -1342,10 +1340,10 @@ static void xe_guc_pc_fini_hw(void *arg)
>  	if (xe_device_wedged(xe))
>  		return;
>  
> -	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(pc_to_gt(pc)), XE_FW_GT);
> -	XE_WARN_ON(xe_guc_pc_stop(pc));
> +	xe_guc_pc_stop(pc);
>  
>  	/* Bind requested freq to mert_freq_cap before unload */
> +	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(pc_to_gt(pc)), XE_FW_GT);

this should be in a different patch.
or at least with a good explanation on why on the commit message.
but the rest of the patch is good...

>  	pc_set_cur_freq(pc, min(pc_max_freq_cap(pc), xe_guc_pc_get_rpe_freq(pc)));
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> index 0678a4e787b3..1025a2b15f5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ struct drm_printer;
>  
>  int xe_guc_pc_init(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>  int xe_guc_pc_start(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> -int xe_guc_pc_stop(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
> +void xe_guc_pc_stop(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>  void xe_guc_pc_print(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, struct drm_printer *p);
>  int xe_guc_pc_action_set_param(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u8 id, u32 value);
>  int xe_guc_pc_action_unset_param(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u8 id);
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-22 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-22 12:10 [PATCH v1 0/2] Minor GuC PC cleanups Raag Jadav
2026-04-22 12:10 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] drm/xe/guc: Make xe_guc_pc_stop() void Raag Jadav
2026-04-22 12:46   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-04-22 12:10 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] drm/xe/gt: Drop redundant forcewake Raag Jadav
2026-04-22 12:46   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-04-22 12:21 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Minor GuC PC cleanups Patchwork
2026-04-22 13:11 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-23  6:23 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aejDDi4gS50ukqJz@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=sk.anirban@intel.com \
    --cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox