Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/24] drm/xe: Add XE_BO_FLAG_PUT_VM_ASYNC
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 12:54:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqRca7kHxdojgb3Y@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqP9wLOjODgyAjkl@fdugast-desk>

On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 03:10:48PM +0200, Francois Dugast wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 02:15:55PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > Add XE_BO_FLAG_PUT_VM_ASYNC, which indicates that an async BO put must
> > also drop an additional reference to the BO’s VM. This is useful when a
> > kernel BO, one that does not normally hold a VM reference, needs to be
> > put asynchronously, ensuring the shared dma-resv object does not
> > disappear before the BO.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260228013501.106680-7-matthew.brost@intel.com
> > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 8 +++++++-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h | 1 +
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> > index b162753cebb7..aea4b0fee8e3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> > @@ -3998,8 +3998,14 @@ void xe_bo_put_commit(struct llist_head *deferred)
> >  	if (!freed)
> >  		return;
> >  
> > -	llist_for_each_entry_safe(bo, next, freed, freed)
> > +	llist_for_each_entry_safe(bo, next, freed, freed) {
> > +		struct xe_vm *vm = bo->vm;
> > +		bool async = bo->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_PUT_VM_ASYNC;
> > +
> >  		drm_gem_object_free(&bo->ttm.base.refcount);
> > +		if (async)
> > +			xe_vm_put(vm);
> 
> You had mentioned reworking this part:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/750807/?series=149888&rev=6#comment_1383757
> 

I reworked the PT BO reference count reinitialization in the PT layer. The
Sashiko feedback was not correct in its original context, but it was
right that transitioning a BO reference count from zero to one on the
driver side is unsafe.

This change follows patch [1] in xe_pt_destroy. Compare it to the prior
revision [2]; note that the kref_init in [2] is gone in [1].

[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/751032/?series=149888&rev=8
[2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/750792/?series=149888&rev=6

Wrt. the comment about ttm_bo_individualize_resv() failing, if that occurs
in ttm_bo_release() (we get here from drm_gem_object_free()), the fences
are waited on directly before returning. See the dma_resv_wait_timeout()
for 30 seconds, after which the BO is destroyed inline if VM lock can be
taken. I guess the VM lock can fall on a trylock, triggering the delayed
worker...

We could look at PT BOs holding a VM reference until xe_ttm_bo_destroy(),
similar to user BOs, but there is some convoluted reason why only user BOs
have held a VM reference from early on in Xe that may or may not still
be true. Let me see if I can make this work as after typing this out it
seems like an extreme corner case of posisble memory safety bug. 

Thanks,
Matt

> Sashiko seems consistent here.
> 
> Francois
> 
> > +	}
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void xe_bo_dev_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> > index 01975586ee88..2168aac1ed1e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
> >  #define XE_BO_FLAG_FORCE_USER_VRAM	BIT(25)
> >  #define XE_BO_FLAG_NO_COMPRESSION	BIT(26)
> >  #define XE_BO_FLAG_NEEDS_1G		BIT(27)
> > +#define XE_BO_FLAG_PUT_VM_ASYNC		BIT(28)
> >  
> >  /* this one is trigger internally only */
> >  #define XE_BO_FLAG_INTERNAL_TEST	BIT(30)
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-11 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-04 21:15 [PATCH v6 00/24] CPU binds and ULLS on migration queue Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 01/24] drm/xe: Drop struct xe_migrate_pt_update argument from populate/clear vfuns Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 02/24] drm/xe: Add xe_migrate_update_pgtables_cpu_execute helper Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 03/24] drm/xe: Decouple exec queue idle check from LRC Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 04/24] drm/xe: Add job count to GuC exec queue snapshot Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 05/24] drm/xe: Update xe_bo_put_deferred arguments to include writeback flag Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 06/24] drm/xe: Add XE_BO_FLAG_PUT_VM_ASYNC Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 13:10   ` Francois Dugast
2026-09-11 19:54     ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-09-12  0:27       ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 07/24] drm/xe: Update scheduler job layer to support PT jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 15:24   ` Francois Dugast
2026-09-11 19:25     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 08/24] drm/xe: Add helpers to access PT ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 09/24] drm/xe: Add struct xe_pt_job_ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 10/24] drm/xe: Update GuC submission backend to run PT jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 11/24] drm/xe: Store level in struct xe_vm_pgtable_update Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 12/24] drm/xe: Don't use migrate exec queue for page fault binds Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 13/24] drm/xe: Enable CPU binds for jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 14/24] drm/xe: Remove unused arguments from xe_migrate_pt_update_ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 15/24] drm/xe: Make bind queues operate cross-tile Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 16/24] drm/xe: Add CPU bind layer Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 17/24] drm/xe: Add device flag to enable PT mirroring across tiles Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 18/24] drm/xe: Add ULLS support to LRC Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 19/24] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to migration layer Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 20/24] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to ring ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 21/24] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to GuC submission Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 22/24] drm/xe: Enter ULLS for migration jobs upon page fault or SVM prefetch Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 23/24] drm/xe: Add modparam to enable / disable ULLS on migrate queue Matthew Brost
2026-09-09  8:03   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-09-09 18:11     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 24/24] drm/xe: Document ULLS for migration jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-09  9:01   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-09-09 17:53     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:24 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for CPU binds and ULLS on migration queue (rev8) Patchwork
2026-09-04 21:26 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-04 22:16 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-05  3:34 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aqRca7kHxdojgb3Y@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox