From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
<badal.nilawar@intel.com>, <raag.jadav@intel.com>,
<riana.tauro@intel.com>, <sk.anirban@intel.com>,
<mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>, <soham.purkait@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Cache temperature availability to reduce probe time
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 17:17:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arrZcykEkTznmWHD@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924205429.2846256-9-karthik.poosa@intel.com>
On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 02:24:24AM +0530, Karthik Poosa wrote:
> Avoid probing temperature sensor availability from the hwmon is_visible()
> callback. For MCTRL and PCIe channels, that path can trigger repeated
> blocking mailbox reads while sysfs attributes are being created, increasing
> probe time and making attribute creation sensitive to transient failures.
>
> Probe temperature availability once during preregistration and cache the
> result for subsequent visibility checks.
fine to cache, perhaps wroth checking that 0 temp case..
but this patch itself looks good:
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> index 052b25a233d6..92280248f1e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,8 @@ struct xe_hwmon_thermal_info {
> };
> /** @count: no of temperature sensors available for the platform */
> u8 count;
> + /** @available: temperature sensor availability cached at registration */
> + bool available[CHANNEL_MAX];
> union {
> /** @value: per-sensor raw mailbox temperature; bit7=sign, bits6:0=magnitude */
> u8 value[U8_MAX + 1];
> @@ -1002,7 +1004,7 @@ static void xe_hwmon_get_voltage(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, int channel, long *valu
> *value = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(REG_FIELD_GET(VOLTAGE_MASK, reg_val) * 2500, SF_VOLTAGE);
> }
>
> -static bool is_temp_available(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, int channel)
> +static bool xe_hwmon_temp_probe(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, int channel)
> {
> struct xe_mmio *mmio = xe_root_tile_mmio(hwmon->xe);
> struct xe_reg reg;
> @@ -1023,10 +1025,6 @@ static bool is_temp_available(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, int channel)
> return false;
> }
>
> - if (channel >= CHANNEL_VRAM_N)
> - sprintf(hwmon->temp.vram_label[channel - CHANNEL_VRAM_N],
> - "vram_ch_%d", channel - CHANNEL_VRAM_N);
> -
> return true;
> case CHANNEL_MCTRL:
> return hwmon->temp.count && !get_mc_temp(hwmon, NULL);
> @@ -1037,6 +1035,22 @@ static bool is_temp_available(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, int channel)
> }
> }
>
> +static void xe_hwmon_init_temp_info(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon)
> +{
> + int channel;
> +
> + if (hwmon->xe->info.has_mbx_thermal_info && xe_hwmon_pcode_read_thermal_info(hwmon))
> + drm_warn(&hwmon->xe->drm, "Thermal mailbox not supported by card firmware\n");
> +
> + for (channel = 0; channel < CHANNEL_MAX; channel++) {
> + hwmon->temp.available[channel] = xe_hwmon_temp_probe(hwmon, channel);
> + if (hwmon->temp.available[channel] &&
> + in_range(channel, CHANNEL_VRAM_N, MAX_VRAM_CHANNELS))
> + snprintf(hwmon->temp.vram_label[channel - CHANNEL_VRAM_N], MAX_LABEL_SIZE,
> + "vram_ch_%d", channel - CHANNEL_VRAM_N);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static umode_t
> xe_hwmon_temp_is_visible(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 attr, int channel)
> {
> @@ -1046,11 +1060,11 @@ xe_hwmon_temp_is_visible(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 attr, int channel)
> case CHANNEL_PKG:
> case CHANNEL_MCTRL:
> case CHANNEL_PCIE:
> - return (is_temp_available(hwmon, channel) &&
> + return (hwmon->temp.available[channel] &&
> hwmon->temp.limit[TEMP_LIMIT_PKG_SHUTDOWN]) ? 0444 : 0;
> case CHANNEL_VRAM:
> case CHANNEL_VRAM_N...CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX:
> - return (is_temp_available(hwmon, channel) &&
> + return (hwmon->temp.available[channel] &&
> hwmon->temp.limit[TEMP_LIMIT_MEM_SHUTDOWN]) ? 0444 : 0;
> default:
> return 0;
> @@ -1060,11 +1074,11 @@ xe_hwmon_temp_is_visible(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 attr, int channel)
> case CHANNEL_PKG:
> case CHANNEL_MCTRL:
> case CHANNEL_PCIE:
> - return (is_temp_available(hwmon, channel) &&
> + return (hwmon->temp.available[channel] &&
> hwmon->temp.limit[TEMP_LIMIT_PKG_CRIT]) ? 0444 : 0;
> case CHANNEL_VRAM:
> case CHANNEL_VRAM_N...CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX:
> - return (is_temp_available(hwmon, channel) &&
> + return (hwmon->temp.available[channel] &&
> hwmon->temp.limit[TEMP_LIMIT_MEM_CRIT]) ? 0444 : 0;
> default:
> return 0;
> @@ -1072,7 +1086,7 @@ xe_hwmon_temp_is_visible(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 attr, int channel)
> case hwmon_temp_max:
> switch (channel) {
> case CHANNEL_PKG:
> - return (is_temp_available(hwmon, channel) &&
> + return (hwmon->temp.available[channel] &&
> hwmon->temp.limit[TEMP_LIMIT_PKG_MAX]) ? 0444 : 0;
> default:
> return 0;
> @@ -1085,7 +1099,7 @@ xe_hwmon_temp_is_visible(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 attr, int channel)
> case CHANNEL_MCTRL:
> case CHANNEL_PCIE:
> case CHANNEL_VRAM_N...CHANNEL_VRAM_N_MAX:
> - return is_temp_available(hwmon, channel) ? 0444 : 0;
> + return hwmon->temp.available[channel] ? 0444 : 0;
> default:
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1627,8 +1641,7 @@ xe_hwmon_get_preregistration_info(struct xe_hwmon *hwmon)
> if (xe_hwmon_is_visible(hwmon, hwmon_fan, hwmon_fan_input, channel))
> xe_hwmon_fan_input_read(hwmon, channel, &fan_speed);
>
> - if (hwmon->xe->info.has_mbx_thermal_info && xe_hwmon_pcode_read_thermal_info(hwmon))
> - drm_warn(&hwmon->xe->drm, "Thermal mailbox not supported by card firmware\n");
> + xe_hwmon_init_temp_info(hwmon);
> }
>
> int xe_hwmon_register(struct xe_device *xe)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 20:54 [PATCH v6 00/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Update hwmon thermal mailbox Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Handle pcode read failures of xe_hwmon_pcode_rmw_power_limit Karthik Poosa
2026-09-28 0:11 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-28 15:32 ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-09-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Decode mailbox temperature as sign-magnitude Karthik Poosa
2026-09-28 0:15 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Fix memory controller thermal data handling Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Add helpers to validate thermal sensor readings Karthik Poosa
2026-09-28 0:19 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-28 16:08 ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-09-28 17:59 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-28 19:38 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-29 16:48 ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-09-29 18:26 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Handle unavailable memory controller sensors Karthik Poosa
2026-09-28 16:08 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Detect unavailable PCIe thermal sensors Karthik Poosa
2026-09-28 16:10 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v6 07/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Consolidate temperature sensor availability checks Karthik Poosa
2026-09-28 19:39 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Cache temperature availability to reduce probe time Karthik Poosa
2026-09-28 21:17 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-09-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] drm/xe/hwmon: use CRI-specific package and VRAM temperature registers Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v6 10/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Add platform-aware VRAM thermal channel support Karthik Poosa
2026-09-29 18:04 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-10-01 19:02 ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-09-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Decode CRI temperature registers as IEEE-754 Karthik Poosa
2026-09-29 18:24 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Update memory controller temperature offset for CRI Karthik Poosa
2026-09-29 18:27 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-24 20:54 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Update PCIE temperature sensor " Karthik Poosa
2026-09-29 18:29 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-30 17:11 ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-09-24 21:05 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/hwmon: Update hwmon thermal mailbox (rev3) Patchwork
2026-09-24 22:34 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-25 11:16 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arrZcykEkTznmWHD@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
--cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=sk.anirban@intel.com \
--cc=soham.purkait@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox