From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: "Tauro, Riana" <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, anshuman.gupta@intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com,
mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com, badal.nilawar@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/xe/hw_error: Initialize hw_error_work per tile
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 06:40:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avP_5gPyp1iSFP0Q@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f16bdbfd-919f-471f-a954-d5e0a7f36159@intel.com>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2026 at 10:15:26AM +0530, Tauro, Riana wrote:
> On 10-11-2026 18:10, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 12:49:47PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
> > > From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Since hw_error_work is now being reused generically, initialize it per tile
> > > so that we don't hit uninitialized work for non-root tile. While at it,
> > > disable hw_error_work on fini to prevent UAF during unwind.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2: add dgfx and sriov check (Sashiko)
> > >
> > > v3: retain original patch and fix unload issue in later patches
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c
> > > index a934b649575c..f7031b341ce0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c
> > > @@ -537,6 +537,19 @@ static void process_hw_errors(struct xe_device *xe)
> > > }
> > > }
> > > +static void hw_error_fini(void *arg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct xe_device *xe = arg;
> > > + struct xe_tile *tile;
> > > + u8 id;
> > > +
> > > + if (!IS_DGFX(xe) || IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> > Why is this needed? fini is not even registered for these cases.
> > Not everything is a bug because AI says so :)
>
> This is added so that it can be re-used in error_detected in patch [7/8]
Which sounds like this should be introduced in the patch which reuses it.
Raag
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + for_each_tile(tile, xe, id)
> > > + disable_work_sync(&tile->hw_error_work);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * xe_hw_error_init - Initialize hw errors
> > > * @xe: xe device instance
> > > @@ -546,12 +559,15 @@ static void process_hw_errors(struct xe_device *xe)
> > > */
> > > void xe_hw_error_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> > > {
> > > - struct xe_tile *tile = xe_device_get_root_tile(xe);
> > > + struct xe_tile *tile;
> > > + u8 id;
> > > if (!IS_DGFX(xe) || IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> > > return;
> > > - INIT_WORK(&tile->hw_error_work, hw_error_work);
> > > + for_each_tile(tile, xe, id)
> > > + INIT_WORK(&tile->hw_error_work, hw_error_work);
> > > process_hw_errors(xe);
> > > + devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, hw_error_fini, xe);
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.47.1
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 7:19 [PATCH v4 0/8] Handle non-fatal errors routed via IRQ Riana Tauro
2026-11-06 7:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/xe/hw_error: Reuse CSC worker for generic error handling Riana Tauro
2026-11-06 7:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/xe/hw_error: Initialize hw_error_work per tile Riana Tauro
2026-11-10 5:48 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-11-10 12:40 ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11 4:45 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-11 5:40 ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2026-11-11 5:51 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-06 7:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/xe/survivability: Guard runtime survivability enable against unbind Riana Tauro
2026-11-10 6:19 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-11-10 12:51 ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11 4:43 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-11 5:39 ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11 5:50 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-11 7:09 ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11 7:17 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-06 7:19 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/xe/ras: Treat non-fatal PCIe errors as recovered Riana Tauro
2026-11-06 7:19 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/xe/pci: Add upstream switch port lookup helper Riana Tauro
2026-11-06 7:19 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] drm/xe/xe_ras: Add a flag for uncorrectable internal error Riana Tauro
2026-11-10 13:07 ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11 4:47 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-06 7:19 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/xe: Add support for wa_14028434957 Riana Tauro
2026-11-10 6:41 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-11-10 13:18 ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11 4:50 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-11 6:15 ` Raag Jadav
2026-11-11 6:22 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-11-06 7:19 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] drm/xe/xe_ras: Skip double-bit ECC page offlining on AER path Riana Tauro
2026-11-06 7:27 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Handle non-fatal errors routed via IRQ (rev4) Patchwork
2026-11-06 7:29 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-11-06 8:13 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-11-07 7:38 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avP_5gPyp1iSFP0Q@black.igk.intel.com \
--to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox