From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/xe: Include additional info on failed force-wake operation
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 12:13:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7a2f7e6-7dfe-4ed9-a875-a54ae372146d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240611163537.1944-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
On 6/11/2024 6:35 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> For debug purposes it might be useful to look at the values of the
> force-wake ack registers in case wake/sleep operations failures.
>
> Move xe_gt_notice() from the caller to the helper function, where
> we have the latest value of force-wake ack register available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> ---
> v2: remove ret2 (Rodrigo)
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> index 8799a2544648..afbca81c12dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> @@ -97,9 +97,17 @@ static void domain_wake(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain)
> static int domain_wake_wait(struct xe_gt *gt,
> struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain)
> {
> - return xe_mmio_wait32(gt, domain->reg_ack, domain->val, domain->val,
> - XE_FORCE_WAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS * USEC_PER_MSEC,
> - NULL, true);
> + u32 value;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = xe_mmio_wait32(gt, domain->reg_ack, domain->val, domain->val,
> + XE_FORCE_WAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS * USEC_PER_MSEC,
> + &value, true);
> + if (ret)
> + xe_gt_notice(gt, "Force wake domain %d failed to ack wake (%pe) reg[%#x] = %#x\n",
> + domain->id, ERR_PTR(ret), domain->reg_ack.addr, value);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void domain_sleep(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain)
> @@ -110,9 +118,17 @@ static void domain_sleep(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain)
> static int domain_sleep_wait(struct xe_gt *gt,
> struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain)
> {
> - return xe_mmio_wait32(gt, domain->reg_ack, domain->val, 0,
> - XE_FORCE_WAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS * USEC_PER_MSEC,
> - NULL, true);
> + u32 value;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = xe_mmio_wait32(gt, domain->reg_ack, domain->val, 0,
> + XE_FORCE_WAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS * USEC_PER_MSEC,
> + &value, true);
> + if (ret)
> + xe_gt_notice(gt, "Force wake domain %d failed to ack sleep (%pe) reg[%#x] = %#x\n",
> + domain->id, ERR_PTR(ret), domain->reg_ack.addr, value);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> #define for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain__, mask__, fw__, tmp__) \
> @@ -128,7 +144,7 @@ int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
> enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, woken = 0;
> unsigned long flags;
> - int ret, ret2 = 0;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&fw->lock, flags);
> for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, domains, fw, tmp) {
> @@ -138,16 +154,12 @@ int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> }
> }
> for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, woken, fw, tmp) {
> - ret = domain_wake_wait(gt, domain);
> - ret2 |= ret;
> - if (ret)
> - xe_gt_notice(gt, "Force wake domain (%d) failed to ack wake, ret=%d\n",
> - domain->id, ret);
> + ret |= domain_wake_wait(gt, domain);
> }
> fw->awake_domains |= woken;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
>
> - return ret2;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> @@ -157,7 +169,7 @@ int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
> enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, sleep = 0;
> unsigned long flags;
> - int ret, ret2 = 0;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&fw->lock, flags);
> for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, domains, fw, tmp) {
> @@ -167,14 +179,10 @@ int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> }
> }
> for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, sleep, fw, tmp) {
> - ret = domain_sleep_wait(gt, domain);
> - ret2 |= ret;
> - if (ret)
> - xe_gt_notice(gt, "Force wake domain (%d) failed to ack sleep, ret=%d\n",
> - domain->id, ret);
> + ret |= domain_sleep_wait(gt, domain);
> }
> fw->awake_domains &= ~sleep;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
>
> - return ret2;
> + return ret;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-12 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-11 16:35 [PATCH v3 0/5] Prepare Xe force-wake code for VFs Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-11 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/xe: Prefer GT oriented messages in xe_force_wake.c Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-12 10:11 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-06-11 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/xe: Kill fw_to_gt() helper Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-11 16:41 ` Francois Dugast
2024-06-12 10:12 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-06-11 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/xe: Include additional info on failed force-wake operation Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-11 17:04 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-06-12 10:13 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-06-11 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] drm/xe: Combine common force-wake code into helpers Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-12 10:14 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-06-11 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/xe/vf: Ignore force-wake requests if VF Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-12 10:15 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-06-11 17:36 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Prepare Xe force-wake code for VFs (rev4) Patchwork
2024-06-11 17:36 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-06-11 17:37 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-06-11 17:49 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-06-11 17:51 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-11 17:53 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-06-11 18:34 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-06-11 22:27 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-12 9:54 ` Michal Wajdeczko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b7a2f7e6-7dfe-4ed9-a875-a54ae372146d@linux.intel.com \
--to=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox