Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Unify pcode related debugs
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 20:37:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b983e82eb9da75fe94be29c628325dfb6210ec08@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610170652.5320-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, 10 Jun 2026, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> The debug spew for the cdclk pcode per/post notify is very
> inconsistent between different platforms. Unify it all to
> the same form.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 65 ++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 09981a112db4..542724256d0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
>  	ret = intel_parent_pcode_write(display, BDW_PCODE_DISPLAY_FREQ_CHANGE_REQ, 0x0);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		drm_err(display->drm,
> -			"failed to inform pcode about cdclk change\n");
> +			"Failed to inform PCODE about start of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -918,8 +918,11 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
>  	if (ret)
>  		drm_err(display->drm, "Switching back to LCPLL failed\n");
>  
> -	intel_parent_pcode_write(display, HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
> -				 cdclk_config->voltage_level);
> +	ret = intel_parent_pcode_write(display, HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
> +				       cdclk_config->voltage_level);
> +	if (ret)
> +		drm_err(display->drm,
> +			"Failed to inform PCODE about end of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
>  
>  	intel_de_write(display, CDCLK_FREQ,
>  		       DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cdclk, 1000) - 1);
> @@ -1181,7 +1184,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
>  					 SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		drm_err(display->drm,
> -			"Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (%d)\n", ret);
> +			"Failed to inform PCODE about start of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1221,8 +1224,11 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
>  	intel_de_posting_read(display, CDCLK_CTL);
>  
>  	/* inform PCU of the change */
> -	intel_parent_pcode_write(display, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> -				 cdclk_config->voltage_level);
> +	ret = intel_parent_pcode_write(display, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> +				       cdclk_config->voltage_level);
> +	if (ret)
> +		drm_err(display->drm,
> +			"Failed to inform PCODE about end of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
>  
>  	intel_update_cdclk(display);
>  }
> @@ -2263,8 +2269,7 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
>  
>  	if (ret) {
>  		drm_err(display->drm,
> -			"Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (err %d, freq %d)\n",
> -			ret, cdclk);
> +			"Failed to inform PCODE about start of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2299,8 +2304,7 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
>  						       cdclk_config->voltage_level, 2);
>  	if (ret)
>  		drm_err(display->drm,
> -			"PCode CDCLK freq set failed, (err %d, freq %d)\n",
> -			ret, cdclk);
> +			"Failed to inform PCODE about end of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
>  
>  	intel_update_cdclk(display);
>  
> @@ -2571,14 +2575,13 @@ void intel_cdclk_dump_config(struct intel_display *display,
>  		    cdclk_config->voltage_level);
>  }
>  
> -static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(struct intel_display *display,
> -				   u8 voltage_level,
> -				   u8 active_pipe_count,
> -				   u16 cdclk,
> -				   bool cdclk_update_valid,
> -				   bool pipe_count_update_valid)
> +static int dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(struct intel_display *display,
> +				  u8 voltage_level,
> +				  u8 active_pipe_count,
> +				  u16 cdclk,
> +				  bool cdclk_update_valid,
> +				  bool pipe_count_update_valid)
>  {
> -	int ret;
>  	u32 update_mask = 0;
>  
>  	update_mask = DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_UPDATE_MASK(cdclk, active_pipe_count, voltage_level);
> @@ -2589,14 +2592,10 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(struct intel_display *display,
>  	if (pipe_count_update_valid)
>  		update_mask |= DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_PIPE_COUNT_VALID;
>  
> -	ret = intel_parent_pcode_request(display, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> -					 update_mask,
> -					 SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
> -					 SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
> -	if (ret)
> -		drm_err(display->drm,
> -			"Failed to inform PCU about display config (err %d)\n",
> -			ret);
> +	return intel_parent_pcode_request(display, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> +					  update_mask,
> +					  SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
> +					  SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
> @@ -2674,6 +2673,7 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_pre_notify(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  		intel_atomic_get_new_cdclk_state(state);
>  	unsigned int cdclk = 0; u8 voltage_level, num_active_pipes = 0;
>  	bool change_cdclk, update_pipe_count;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!intel_cdclk_changed(&old_cdclk_state->actual,
>  				 &new_cdclk_state->actual) &&
> @@ -2708,8 +2708,11 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_pre_notify(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  	if (update_pipe_count)
>  		num_active_pipes = dg2_power_well_count(display, new_cdclk_state);
>  
> -	dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(display, voltage_level, num_active_pipes, cdclk,
> -			       change_cdclk, update_pipe_count);
> +	ret = dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(display, voltage_level, num_active_pipes, cdclk,
> +				     change_cdclk, update_pipe_count);
> +	if (ret)
> +		drm_err(display->drm,
> +			"Failed to inform PCODE about start of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
>  }
>  
>  static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_post_notify(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> @@ -2721,6 +2724,7 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_post_notify(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  		intel_atomic_get_old_cdclk_state(state);
>  	unsigned int cdclk = 0; u8 voltage_level, num_active_pipes = 0;
>  	bool update_cdclk, update_pipe_count;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	/* According to "Sequence After Frequency Change", set voltage to used level */
>  	voltage_level = new_cdclk_state->actual.voltage_level;
> @@ -2747,8 +2751,11 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_post_notify(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  	if (update_pipe_count)
>  		num_active_pipes = dg2_power_well_count(display, new_cdclk_state);
>  
> -	dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(display, voltage_level, num_active_pipes, cdclk,
> -			       update_cdclk, update_pipe_count);
> +	ret = dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(display, voltage_level, num_active_pipes, cdclk,
> +				     update_cdclk, update_pipe_count);
> +	if (ret)
> +		drm_err(display->drm,
> +			"Failed to inform PCODE about end of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
>  }
>  
>  bool intel_cdclk_is_decreasing_later(struct intel_atomic_state *state)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-10 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-10 17:06 [PATCH 00/14] drm/i915/cdclk: cdclk pcode related fixes and refactoring Ville Syrjala
2026-06-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Don't bail if pcode post nofify fails Ville Syrjala
2026-06-10 17:32   ` Jani Nikula
2026-06-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Pass CDCLK in MHz to pcode on DG2 Ville Syrjala
2026-06-10 17:31   ` Jani Nikula
2026-06-10 18:54     ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-06-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Do the DG2 CDCLK/pipe power well notify properly Ville Syrjala
2026-06-11  7:23   ` Jani Nikula
2026-06-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Notify DG2 pcode about pipe power wells regardless of CDCLK Ville Syrjala
2026-06-11  7:31   ` Jani Nikula
2026-06-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Stop forcing voltage level to 3 all the time on DG2 Ville Syrjala
2026-06-11  7:35   ` Jani Nikula
2026-06-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Drop pointless platform check from bxt_set_cdclk() Ville Syrjala
2026-06-11  7:37   ` Jani Nikula
2026-06-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915/dg2: s/intel_/dg2_/ for DG2 specific stuff Ville Syrjala
2026-06-10 17:34   ` Jani Nikula
2026-06-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Unify the pcode pre/post notify in bxt_set_cdclk() Ville Syrjala
2026-06-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Unify pcode related debugs Ville Syrjala
2026-06-10 17:37   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-06-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Extract bdw_cdclk_pcode_{pre, post}_notify() Ville Syrjala
2026-06-10 17:38   ` Jani Nikula
2026-06-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Extract skl_cdclk_pcode_{pre, post}_notify() Ville Syrjala
2026-06-10 17:38   ` Jani Nikula
2026-06-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Extract bxt_cdclk_pcode_{pre, post}_notify() Ville Syrjala
2026-06-10 17:39   ` Jani Nikula
2026-06-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Introduce CDCLK .{pre, post}_notify() vfuncs Ville Syrjala
2026-06-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Hoist intel_cdclk_{pre, post}_notify() calls upwards Ville Syrjala
2026-06-10 17:17 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/i915/cdclk: cdclk pcode related fixes and refactoring Patchwork
2026-06-10 18:11 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-06-10 22:49 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b983e82eb9da75fe94be29c628325dfb6210ec08@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox