Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Manna,  Animesh" <animesh.manna@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Kandpal, Suraj" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
	"Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/15] drm/i915/alpm: Auxless wake time calculation for Xe3p
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 07:22:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf6a767a132ebd4ae25c4072d64cb4f790866b1e.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825054536.3455704-7-animesh.manna@intel.com>

On Tue, 2026-08-25 at 11:15 +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
> Add support for auxless waketime calculation for DP2.1 ALPM
> as dependent parameter got changed.
> 
> v1: Initial version.
> v2: Use intel_dp_is_uhbr(). [Jani]
> v3:
> - Separate out switch to active latency calculation.
> - Use macro definition for ML_PHY_LOCK length. [Suraj]
> - Modify AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME bitfield for xe3lpd. [Suraj]

I think you should split this into separate patch.

> 
> Bspec: 71477
> Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c     | 61 +++++++++++++++--
> --
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h |  2 +
>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> index 4b15d96d0ad7..af2733805505 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> @@ -105,21 +105,50 @@ static int get_lfps_half_cycle_clocks(const
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  		1000 / (2 * LFPS_CYCLE_COUNT);
>  }
>  
> +#define ML_PHY_LOCK_LEN		252
> +#define ML_PHY_LOCK_LEN_UHBR	396
> +
>  static int get_tphy2_p2_to_p0(const struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state)
>  {
> -	return 12 * 1000;
> +	struct intel_display *display =
> to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> +
> +	return DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 35 ? (20 * 1000) : (12 *
> 1000);
>  }
>  
> -static int get_establishment_period(const struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state)
> +static int get_establishment_period(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +				    const struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state)
>  {
>  	int t1 = 50 * 1000;
> -	int tps4 = 252;
> +	int tps4 = intel_dp_is_uhbr(crtc_state) ?
> (ML_PHY_LOCK_LEN_UHBR * 32) :
> +		   (ML_PHY_LOCK_LEN * 10);

Add get_ml_phy_lock_len() and use intel_dp_link_symbol_size().

>  	/* port_clock is link rate in 10kbit/s units */
> -	int tml_phy_lock = 1000 * 1000 * tps4 / crtc_state-
> >port_clock;
> +	int tml_phy_lock = 1000 * 1000 * tps4 / crtc_state-
> >port_clock / 10;

10 should be intel_dp_link_symbol_size().

> +	int lttpr_count = 0;
>  	int tcds, establishment_period;
>  
> -	tcds = (7 + DIV_ROUND_UP(6500, tml_phy_lock) + 1) *
> tml_phy_lock;
> -	establishment_period = (SILENCE_PERIOD_TIME + t1 + tcds);
> +	if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)) {
> +		tcds = (7 + DIV_ROUND_UP(6500, tml_phy_lock) + 1) *
> tml_phy_lock;
> +	} else {
> +		tcds = 7 * tml_phy_lock;
> +		lttpr_count = drm_dp_lttpr_count(intel_dp-
> >lttpr_common_caps);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (lttpr_count) {
> +		int tlw = 13000;
> +		int tcs = 10000;

Where these numbers are coming from?

> +		int tlfps_period = get_lfps_cycle_time(crtc_state);
> +		int tdcs = (SILENCE_PERIOD_TIME + t1 + tcs +
> +			    (lttpr_count - 1) * (tlw +
> tlfps_period));
> +		int tacds = 70000;
> +		int tds = (lttpr_count - 1) * 7 * tml_phy_lock;

I think it would be easier to follow these formulas against Bspec if
you:

int tds = 7 * tml_phy_lock;
establishment_period = tlw + tlfps_period + tdcs + tacds + (lttpr_count
- 1) * tds + tcds;

BR,
Jouni Högander
> +
> +		/* tdrl is same as tcds*/
> +		establishment_period = tlw + tlfps_period + tdcs +
> tacds + tds + tcds;
> +	} else {
> +		/* TODO: Add a check for data realign by DPCD
> 0x116[3] */
> +
> +		establishment_period = (SILENCE_PERIOD_TIME + t1 +
> tcds);
> +	}
>  
>  	return establishment_period;
>  }
> @@ -141,12 +170,16 @@ static int get_establishment_period(const
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>   * within the CDS period complete within the CDS period regardless
> of
>   * entry into the period
>   * tML_PHY_LOCK = TPS4 Length * ( 10 / (Link Rate in MHz) )
> - * TPS4 Length = 252 Symbols
> + * ML_PHY_LOCK Length (8b/10b): 252
> + * ML_PHY_LOCK Length (128b/132b): 396
> + * TPS4 Length = ML_PHY_LOCK * Rate Div
> + * Rate Div = 32 for 128b/132b and 10 for 8b/10b.
>   */
> -static int _lnl_compute_aux_less_wake_time(const struct
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +static int _lnl_compute_aux_less_wake_time(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
> +					   const struct
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
>  	int tphy2_p2_to_p0 = get_tphy2_p2_to_p0(crtc_state);
> -	int establishment_period =
> get_establishment_period(crtc_state);
> +	int establishment_period =
> get_establishment_period(intel_dp, crtc_state);
>  
>  	return DIV_ROUND_UP(tphy2_p2_to_p0 +
> get_lfps_cycle_time(crtc_state) +
>  			    establishment_period, 1000);
> @@ -161,7 +194,7 @@ _lnl_compute_aux_less_alpm_params(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
>  		lfps_half_cycle;
>  
>  	aux_less_wake_time =
> -		_lnl_compute_aux_less_wake_time(crtc_state);
> +		_lnl_compute_aux_less_wake_time(intel_dp,
> crtc_state);
>  	aux_less_wake_lines = intel_usecs_to_scanlines(&crtc_state-
> >hw.adjusted_mode,
>  						      
> aux_less_wake_time);
>  	silence_period = get_silence_period_symbols(crtc_state);
> @@ -430,8 +463,12 @@ static void lnl_alpm_configure(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
>  	if (intel_alpm_is_alpm_aux_less(intel_dp, crtc_state)) {
>  		alpm_ctl = ALPM_CTL_ALPM_ENABLE |
>  			ALPM_CTL_ALPM_AUX_LESS_ENABLE |
> -			ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_SLEEP_HOLD_TIME_50_SYMBOLS
> |
> -			ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME(crtc_state-
> >alpm_state.aux_less_wake_lines);
> +			ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_SLEEP_HOLD_TIME_50_SYMBOLS
> ;
> +
> +		if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 35)
> +			alpm_ctl |=
> ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME(crtc_state-
> >alpm_state.aux_less_wake_lines);
> +		else
> +			alpm_ctl |=
> ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_XE3LPD(crtc_state-
> >alpm_state.aux_less_wake_lines);
>  
>  		if (intel_dp->as_sdp_supported) {
>  			u32 pr_alpm_ctl =
> get_pr_alpm_as_sdp_transmission_time(crtc_state);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> index 16a9e3af198d..8ec99bbd84b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> @@ -299,7 +299,9 @@
>  #define  ALPM_CTL_EXTENDED_FAST_WAKE_MIN_LINES		5
>  #define 
> ALPM_CTL_EXTENDED_FAST_WAKE_TIME(lines)	REG_FIELD_PREP(ALPM_CTL_EXTENDED_FAST_WAKE_TIME_MASK,(lines)-ALPM_CTL_EXTENDED_FAST_WAKE_MIN_LINES)
>  #define 
> ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_MASK		REG_GENMASK(5, 0)
> +#define 
> ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_MASK_XE3LPD	REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
>  #define 
> ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME(val)		REG_FIELD_PREP(ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_MASK,val)
> +#define 
> ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_XE3LPD(val)	REG_FIELD_PREP(ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_MASK_XE3LPD,val)
>  
>  #define _ALPM_CTL2_A	0x60954
>  #define ALPM_CTL2(dev_priv, tran)	_MMIO_TRANS2(dev_priv, tran,
> _ALPM_CTL2_A)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-02  7:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-25  5:45 [PATCH v5 00/15] Enable DP2.1 alpm Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] drm/i915/alpm: Add DPCD definition for DP2.1 ALPM capability Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  7:55   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2026-08-27 10:51     ` Manna, Animesh
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] drm/i915/alpm: Move alpm sink capabality readout in separate function Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25  7:57   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2026-09-02  5:30     ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] drm/i915/alpm: alpm_init() for DP2.1 Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  7:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  6:09   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] drm/i915/alpm: Enable debugfs " Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  6:14   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] drm/i915/alpm: Refactor Auxless wake time calculation Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] drm/i915/alpm: Auxless wake time calculation for Xe3p Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  7:22   ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] drm/i915/alpm: table based establishment period Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  7:24   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] drm/i915/alpm: Half LFPS cycle calculation Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  8:41   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-09-02  9:30     ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] drm/i915/alpm: Modify LFPS cycle count for DP ALPM Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  8:49   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] drm/i915/alpm: Program LTTPR count for DP 2.1 ALPM Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  9:27   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] drm/i915/alpm: Enable MAC Transmitting LFPS for LT PHY Animesh Manna
2026-09-02  9:37   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] drm/i915/alpm: Replace is_edp() with alpm_is_possible() Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  9:49   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] drm/i915/alpm: Introduce has_alpm to decouple from pr/psr2/lobf Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 10:04   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] drm/i915/alpm: Compute and program switch to active latency Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 10:10   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] drm/i915/alpm: Program zero-based LFPS half cycle duration Animesh Manna
2026-08-25  6:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 10:17   ` Hogander, Jouni
2026-08-25  7:59 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Enable DP2.1 alpm (rev5) Patchwork
2026-08-25  8:01 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-08-25  8:41 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-25 12:23 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cf6a767a132ebd4ae25c4072d64cb4f790866b1e.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox