From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/23] drm/xe: Move 'has_flatccs' flag back to platform descriptor
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 13:50:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc7266763823a6b8876dc0d6e9cfa6bb0297d999@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251007204829.1468209-31-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
On Tue, 07 Oct 2025, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> @@ -604,6 +605,8 @@ static int xe_info_init_early(struct xe_device *xe,
>
> xe->info.is_dgfx = desc->is_dgfx;
> xe->info.has_fan_control = desc->has_fan_control;
> + /* runtime fusing may force flat_ccs to disabled later */
> + xe->info.has_flat_ccs = desc->has_flat_ccs;
Related, but not specific to this patch:
I'm looking at bspec 59255 and it seems to me the fusing is about CCS in
general, not about aux vs flat.
Should the runtime fusing be separated from has_flat_ccs? Am I missing
something here?
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-10 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-07 20:48 [PATCH v4 00/23] Allow configfs to disable specific GT type(s) Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] drm/xe/huc: Adjust HuC check on primary GT Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] drm/xe: Drop GT parameter to xe_display_irq_postinstall() Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] drm/xe: Move 'va_bits' flag back to platform descriptor Matt Roper
2025-10-07 22:02 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-07 22:44 ` Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] drm/xe: Move 'vm_max_level' " Matt Roper
2025-10-07 21:54 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-08 13:28 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] drm/xe: Move 'vram_flags' " Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] drm/xe: Move 'has_flatccs' " Matt Roper
2025-10-10 10:50 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-10-13 16:42 ` Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] drm/xe: Read VF GMD_ID with a specifically-allocated dummy GT Matt Roper
2025-10-08 3:06 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] drm/xe: Move primary GT allocation from xe_tile_init_early to xe_tile_init Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] drm/xe: Skip L2 / TDF cache flushes if primary GT is disabled Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] drm/xe/query: Report hwconfig size as 0 " Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] drm/xe/pmu: Initialize PMU event types based on first available GT Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] drm/xe: Check for primary GT before looking up Wa_22019338487 Matt Roper
2025-10-08 13:30 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] drm/xe: Make display part of Wa_22019338487 a device workaround Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] drm/xe/irq: Don't try to lookup engine masks for non-existent primary GT Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] drm/xe: Handle Wa_22010954014 and Wa_14022085890 as device workarounds Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] drm/xe/rtp: Pass xe_device parameter to FUNC matches Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] drm/xe: Bypass Wa_14018094691 when primary GT is disabled Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] drm/xe: Correct lineage for Wa_22014953428 and only check with valid GT Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] drm/xe: Check that GT is not NULL before testing Wa_16023588340 Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] drm/xe: Don't check BIOS-disabled FlatCCS if primary GT is disabled Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] drm/xe: Break GT setup out of xe_info_init() Matt Roper
2025-10-08 3:15 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-08 13:39 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] drm/xe/configfs: Add attribute to disable GT types Matt Roper
2025-10-08 3:37 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-08 19:10 ` Matt Roper
2025-10-08 19:22 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-08 10:12 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-08 20:08 ` Matt Roper
2025-10-08 21:10 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-08 14:06 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] drm/xe/sriov: Disable SR-IOV if primary GT is disabled via configfs Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:56 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Allow configfs to disable specific GT type(s) (rev4) Patchwork
2025-10-07 20:57 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-07 21:49 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-07 23:22 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc7266763823a6b8876dc0d6e9cfa6bb0297d999@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox