From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/23] drm/xe: Move 'vm_max_level' flag back to platform descriptor
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 10:28:08 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <175993008801.201562.9741607596597062253@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251007204829.1468209-29-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Quoting Matt Roper (2025-10-07 17:48:34-03:00)
>The number of page table levels for PPGTT virtual addresses is something
>that should be tracked at the platform level rather than the IP level.
>Even when mixing and matching various graphics, media, and display IP
>blocks, the platform as a whole has to have consistent page table
>handling. This is also a trait that should be tied to the platform even
>if the graphics IP itself is not present (e.g., if we disable the
>primary GT via configfs).
>
>v2:
> - Drop default value of 4 and explicitly set the value in each platform
> descriptor. (Lucas)
>v3:
> - Drop outdated code comment and commit message paragraph about default
> value. (Gustavo)
>
>Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>index 69ed987fef67..8688f40f55d8 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>@@ -51,13 +51,10 @@ __diag_ignore_all("-Woverride-init", "Allow field overrides in table");
>
> static const struct xe_graphics_desc graphics_xelp = {
> .hw_engine_mask = BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_RCS0) | BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_BCS0),
>-
>- .vm_max_level = 3,
> };
>
> #define XE_HP_FEATURES \
>- .has_range_tlb_inval = true, \
>- .vm_max_level = 3
>+ .has_range_tlb_inval = true
>
> static const struct xe_graphics_desc graphics_xehpg = {
> .hw_engine_mask =
>@@ -82,7 +79,6 @@ static const struct xe_graphics_desc graphics_xehpc = {
> BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_CCS2) | BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_CCS3),
>
> XE_HP_FEATURES,
>- .vm_max_level = 4,
> .vram_flags = XE_VRAM_FLAGS_NEED64K,
>
> .has_asid = 1,
>@@ -105,7 +101,6 @@ static const struct xe_graphics_desc graphics_xelpg = {
> .has_range_tlb_inval = 1, \
> .has_usm = 1, \
> .has_64bit_timestamp = 1, \
>- .vm_max_level = 4, \
> .hw_engine_mask = \
> BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_RCS0) | \
> BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_BCS8) | BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_BCS0) | \
>@@ -183,6 +178,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc rkl_desc = {
> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
> .require_force_probe = true,
> .va_bits = 48,
>+ .vm_max_level = 3,
> };
I think we are missing setting ".vm_max_level = 3" for tgl_desc as well.
With that fixed,
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
>
> static const u16 adls_rpls_ids[] = { INTEL_RPLS_IDS(NOP), 0 };
>@@ -202,6 +198,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc adl_s_desc = {
> {},
> },
> .va_bits = 48,
>+ .vm_max_level = 3,
> };
>
> static const u16 adlp_rplu_ids[] = { INTEL_RPLU_IDS(NOP), 0 };
>@@ -221,6 +218,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc adl_p_desc = {
> {},
> },
> .va_bits = 48,
>+ .vm_max_level = 3,
> };
>
> static const struct xe_device_desc adl_n_desc = {
>@@ -234,6 +232,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc adl_n_desc = {
> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
> .require_force_probe = true,
> .va_bits = 48,
>+ .vm_max_level = 3,
> };
>
> #define DGFX_FEATURES \
>@@ -251,6 +250,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc dg1_desc = {
> .max_gt_per_tile = 1,
> .require_force_probe = true,
> .va_bits = 48,
>+ .vm_max_level = 3,
> };
>
> static const u16 dg2_g10_ids[] = { INTEL_DG2_G10_IDS(NOP), INTEL_ATS_M150_IDS(NOP), 0 };
>@@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ static const u16 dg2_g12_ids[] = { INTEL_DG2_G12_IDS(NOP), 0 };
> { XE_SUBPLATFORM_DG2_G12, "G12", dg2_g12_ids }, \
> { } \
> }, \
>- .va_bits = 48
>+ .va_bits = 48, \
>+ .vm_max_level = 3
>
> static const struct xe_device_desc ats_m_desc = {
> .pre_gmdid_graphics_ip = &graphics_ip_xehpg,
>@@ -307,6 +308,7 @@ static const __maybe_unused struct xe_device_desc pvc_desc = {
> .max_remote_tiles = 1,
> .require_force_probe = true,
> .va_bits = 57,
>+ .vm_max_level = 4,
> .has_mbx_power_limits = false,
> };
>
>@@ -319,6 +321,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc mtl_desc = {
> .has_pxp = true,
> .max_gt_per_tile = 2,
> .va_bits = 48,
>+ .vm_max_level = 4,
> };
>
> static const struct xe_device_desc lnl_desc = {
>@@ -329,6 +332,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc lnl_desc = {
> .max_gt_per_tile = 2,
> .needs_scratch = true,
> .va_bits = 48,
>+ .vm_max_level = 4,
> };
>
> static const struct xe_device_desc bmg_desc = {
>@@ -345,6 +349,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc bmg_desc = {
> .max_gt_per_tile = 2,
> .needs_scratch = true,
> .va_bits = 48,
>+ .vm_max_level = 4,
> };
>
> static const struct xe_device_desc ptl_desc = {
>@@ -355,6 +360,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc ptl_desc = {
> .max_gt_per_tile = 2,
> .needs_scratch = true,
> .va_bits = 48,
>+ .vm_max_level = 4,
> };
>
> #undef PLATFORM
>@@ -593,6 +599,7 @@ static int xe_info_init_early(struct xe_device *xe,
>
> xe->info.dma_mask_size = desc->dma_mask_size;
> xe->info.va_bits = desc->va_bits;
>+ xe->info.vm_max_level = desc->vm_max_level;
>
> xe->info.is_dgfx = desc->is_dgfx;
> xe->info.has_fan_control = desc->has_fan_control;
>@@ -723,7 +730,6 @@ static int xe_info_init(struct xe_device *xe,
> }
>
> xe->info.vram_flags = graphics_desc->vram_flags;
>- xe->info.vm_max_level = graphics_desc->vm_max_level;
> xe->info.has_asid = graphics_desc->has_asid;
> xe->info.has_atomic_enable_pte_bit = graphics_desc->has_atomic_enable_pte_bit;
> if (xe->info.platform != XE_PVC)
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h
>index 796439571abe..6354280584d9 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci_types.h
>@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct xe_device_desc {
> u8 max_remote_tiles:2;
> u8 max_gt_per_tile:2;
> u8 va_bits;
>+ u8 vm_max_level;
>
> u8 require_force_probe:1;
> u8 is_dgfx:1;
>@@ -52,7 +53,6 @@ struct xe_device_desc {
> };
>
> struct xe_graphics_desc {
>- u8 vm_max_level;
> u8 vram_flags;
>
> u64 hw_engine_mask; /* hardware engines provided by graphics IP */
>--
>2.51.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-08 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-07 20:48 [PATCH v4 00/23] Allow configfs to disable specific GT type(s) Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] drm/xe/huc: Adjust HuC check on primary GT Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] drm/xe: Drop GT parameter to xe_display_irq_postinstall() Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] drm/xe: Move 'va_bits' flag back to platform descriptor Matt Roper
2025-10-07 22:02 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-07 22:44 ` Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] drm/xe: Move 'vm_max_level' " Matt Roper
2025-10-07 21:54 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-08 13:28 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] drm/xe: Move 'vram_flags' " Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] drm/xe: Move 'has_flatccs' " Matt Roper
2025-10-10 10:50 ` Jani Nikula
2025-10-13 16:42 ` Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] drm/xe: Read VF GMD_ID with a specifically-allocated dummy GT Matt Roper
2025-10-08 3:06 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] drm/xe: Move primary GT allocation from xe_tile_init_early to xe_tile_init Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] drm/xe: Skip L2 / TDF cache flushes if primary GT is disabled Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] drm/xe/query: Report hwconfig size as 0 " Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] drm/xe/pmu: Initialize PMU event types based on first available GT Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] drm/xe: Check for primary GT before looking up Wa_22019338487 Matt Roper
2025-10-08 13:30 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] drm/xe: Make display part of Wa_22019338487 a device workaround Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] drm/xe/irq: Don't try to lookup engine masks for non-existent primary GT Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] drm/xe: Handle Wa_22010954014 and Wa_14022085890 as device workarounds Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] drm/xe/rtp: Pass xe_device parameter to FUNC matches Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] drm/xe: Bypass Wa_14018094691 when primary GT is disabled Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] drm/xe: Correct lineage for Wa_22014953428 and only check with valid GT Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] drm/xe: Check that GT is not NULL before testing Wa_16023588340 Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] drm/xe: Don't check BIOS-disabled FlatCCS if primary GT is disabled Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] drm/xe: Break GT setup out of xe_info_init() Matt Roper
2025-10-08 3:15 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-08 13:39 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] drm/xe/configfs: Add attribute to disable GT types Matt Roper
2025-10-08 3:37 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-08 19:10 ` Matt Roper
2025-10-08 19:22 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-08 10:12 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-08 20:08 ` Matt Roper
2025-10-08 21:10 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-08 14:06 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-10-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] drm/xe/sriov: Disable SR-IOV if primary GT is disabled via configfs Matt Roper
2025-10-07 20:56 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Allow configfs to disable specific GT type(s) (rev4) Patchwork
2025-10-07 20:57 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-07 21:49 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-07 23:22 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=175993008801.201562.9741607596597062253@intel.com \
--to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox