Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Poosa, Karthik" <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
To: <sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Handle pcode read failures of xe_hwmon_pcode_rmw_power_limit
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 19:56:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e17cf560-9107-49f2-9d3d-2fee9db7edb2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924112332.E27421F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>


On 24-09-2026 16:53, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] sysfs: returning 0 on error in store callback causes userspace infinite loop
> --
>
> commit fdbe8069cbe324980fc35768d7993da6a046117b
> Author: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
> drm/xe/hwmon: Handle pcode read failures of xe_hwmon_pcode_rmw_power_limit
>
> This commit adds error handling for pcode read failures in
> xe_hwmon_pcode_rmw_power_limit() and checks the returned error in callers
> to prevent updating power limit settings with invalid data.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
> [ ... ]
>> @@ -679,11 +683,13 @@ xe_hwmon_power_max_interval_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *a
>>   
>>   	mutex_lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
>>   
>> -	if (hwmon->xe->info.has_mbx_power_limits)
>> -		xe_hwmon_pcode_rmw_power_limit(hwmon, power_attr, channel, PWR_LIM_TIME, rxy);
>> -	else
>> +	if (hwmon->xe->info.has_mbx_power_limits) {
>> +		if (xe_hwmon_pcode_rmw_power_limit(hwmon, power_attr, channel, PWR_LIM_TIME, rxy))
>> +			count = 0;
> [Severity: Medium]
> In xe_hwmon_power_max_interval_store() within drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c,
> will setting count to 0 here cause userspace tools to enter an infinite loop?
>
> When a sysfs store callback returns 0 instead of a negative error code, it
> indicates to the virtual file system that 0 bytes were written and swallows
> the error. Standard userspace utilities (like echo or dd) often treat a
> 0-byte write as a short write and retry infinitely.
>
> If an administrative user or script writes to the sysfs attribute and the
> underlying pcode mailbox operation fails, could this cause an infinite loop
> that consumes maximum processor time while simultaneously flooding the kernel
> log with error messages?
>
> Should this return the negative error code from
> xe_hwmon_pcode_rmw_power_limit() instead of setting count to 0?
I shall return -EIO instead of 0 here in next revision.
>
>> +	} else {
>>   		r = xe_mmio_rmw32(mmio, xe_hwmon_get_reg(hwmon, REG_PKG_RAPL_LIMIT, channel),
>>   				  PWR_LIM_TIME, rxy);
>> +	}
>>   
>>   	mutex_unlock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 11:11 [PATCH v5 00/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Update hwmon thermal mailbox Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Handle pcode read failures of xe_hwmon_pcode_rmw_power_limit Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 11:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 14:26     ` Poosa, Karthik [this message]
2026-09-24 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Decode mailbox temperature as sign-magnitude Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Fix memory controller thermal data handling Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 11:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Add helpers to validate thermal sensor readings Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Handle unavailable memory controller sensors Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Detect unavailable PCIe thermal sensors Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Consolidate temperature sensor availability checks Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 11:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 13:16     ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-09-24 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Cache temperature availability to reduce probe time Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Add platform-aware VRAM thermal channel support Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 11:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 13:40     ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-09-24 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] drm/xe/hwmon: use CRI-specific package and VRAM temperature registers Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 11:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 13:41     ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-09-24 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Decode CRI temperature registers as IEEE-754 Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 11:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Update memory controller temperature offset for CRI Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Update PCIE temperature sensor " Karthik Poosa
2026-09-24 11:40 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/hwmon: Update hwmon thermal mailbox (rev2) Patchwork
2026-09-24 12:56 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e17cf560-9107-49f2-9d3d-2fee9db7edb2@intel.com \
    --to=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox