From: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
To: "Anoop, Vijay" <anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>,
<riana.tauro@intel.com>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
<umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>, <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
<michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>, <mohamed.mansoor.v@intel.com>,
<kam.nasim@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] drm/xe/sc: Add system controller component for Xe3p dGPU platforms
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 11:13:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2eb63ba-2e7a-4270-847f-9598d56f3850@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251122045803.3616201-12-anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
On 22-11-2025 10:28, Anoop, Vijay wrote:
> From: Anoop Vijay <anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
>
> Add a new system controller (SC) component for Intel Xe3p dGPU platforms.
>
> This component provides the foundational infrastructure for communication
> with the SC firmware using the MKHI protocol over a mailbox interface.
>
> Key features introduced:
> - Detection and initialization of the SC interface on Xe3p dGPU platforms
> - Mailbox communication with SC firmware
> - Fragmented message transfer for large command payloads
>
> This implementation establishes the base for future SC feature
> enablement and firmware command handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anoop Vijay <anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_sc_regs.h | 49 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 5 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 5 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc.c | 89 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc.h | 15 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_mailbox.c | 374 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_mailbox.h | 61 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_types.h | 35 +++
> 9 files changed, 635 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_sc_regs.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_mailbox.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_mailbox.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_types.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> index 7ebfbf9051bf..50e8dc86d915 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> @@ -114,7 +114,9 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
> xe_ring_ops.o \
> xe_rtp.o \
> xe_sa.o \
> + xe_sc.o \
> xe_sched_job.o \
> + xe_sc_mailbox.o \
> xe_shrinker.o \
> xe_step.o \
> xe_survivability_mode.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_sc_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_sc_regs.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2b7053586197
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_sc_regs.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _XE_SC_REGS_H_
> +#define _XE_SC_REGS_H_
> +
> +#include "xe_regs.h"
> +
> +#define SYSCTRL_BASE_OFFSET 0xDB000
> +#define SYSCTRL_BASE (SOC_BASE + SYSCTRL_BASE_OFFSET)
> +#define SYSCTRL_MAILBOX_INDEX 0x03
> +#define SC_BAR_LENGTH 0x1000
> +
> +#define SC_MB_CTRL XE_REG(SYSCTRL_BASE + 0x10)
> +#define SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY REG_BIT(31)
> +#define SC_MB_CTRL_IRQ REG_BIT(30)
> +#define SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY_OUT REG_BIT(29)
> +#define SC_MB_CTRL_PARAM3 REG_GENMASK(28, 24)
> +#define SC_MB_CTRL_PARAM2 REG_GENMASK(23, 16)
> +#define SC_MB_CTRL_PARAM1 REG_GENMASK(15, 8)
> +#define SC_MB_CTRL_COMMAND REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
> +
> +#define SC_MB_DATA0 XE_REG(SYSCTRL_BASE + 0x14)
> +#define SC_MB_DATA1 XE_REG(SYSCTRL_BASE + 0x18)
> +#define SC_MB_DATA2 XE_REG(SYSCTRL_BASE + 0x1C)
> +#define SC_MB_DATA3 XE_REG(SYSCTRL_BASE + 0x20)
> +
> +#define MKHI_FRAME_PHASE REG_BIT(24)
> +#define MKHI_FRAME_CURRENT REG_GENMASK(21, 16)
> +#define MKHI_FRAME_TOTAL REG_GENMASK(13, 8)
> +#define MKHI_FRAME_COMMAND REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
> +
> +#define MKHI_HDR_RESULT REG_GENMASK(31, 24)
> +#define MKHI_HDR_IS_RESPONSE REG_BIT(15)
> +#define MKHI_HDR_COMMAND REG_GENMASK(14, 8)
> +#define MKHI_HDR_GROUP_ID REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
> +
> +#define SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE 16
> +#define SC_MB_MAX_FRAMES 64
> +#define SC_MB_MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE (SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE * SC_MB_MAX_FRAMES)
> +#define SC_MKHI_COMMAND 5
> +
> +#define SC_MB_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MS 500
> +#define SC_MB_RETRY_TIMEOUT_MS 20
> +#define SC_MB_POLL_INTERVAL_US 100
> +
> +#endif /* _XE_SC_REGS_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index f15489c100af..9fbd0b084c74 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
> #include "xe_psmi.h"
> #include "xe_pxp.h"
> #include "xe_query.h"
> +#include "xe_sc.h"
> #include "xe_soc_remapper.h"
> #include "xe_shrinker.h"
> #include "xe_survivability_mode.h"
> @@ -963,6 +964,10 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (err)
> goto err_unregister_display;
>
> + err = xe_sc_init(xe);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_unregister_display;
> +
> for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> xe_gt_sanitize_freq(gt);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> index 3f118c64a124..86a0c83c802d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> @@ -314,6 +314,8 @@ struct xe_device {
> u8 has_range_tlb_inval:1;
> /** @info.has_sriov: Supports SR-IOV */
> u8 has_sriov:1;
> + /** @info.has_sysctrl: Supports System Controller */
> + u8 has_sysctrl:1;
> /** @info.has_usm: Device has unified shared memory support */
> u8 has_usm:1;
> /** @info.has_64bit_timestamp: Device supports 64-bit timestamps */
> @@ -576,6 +578,9 @@ struct xe_device {
> /** @heci_gsc: graphics security controller */
> struct xe_heci_gsc heci_gsc;
>
> + /** @sc: System Controller */
> + struct xe_sc *sc;
> +
> /** @nvm: discrete graphics non-volatile memory */
> struct intel_dg_nvm_dev *nvm;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..18448efc173f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include "xe_sc.h"
> +
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +
> +#include <drm/drm_managed.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_print.h>
> +
> +#include "regs/xe_sc_regs.h"
> +#include "xe_device.h"
> +#include "xe_mmio.h"
> +#include "xe_platform_types.h"
> +#include "xe_soc_remapper.h"
> +#include "xe_sc_types.h"
> +#include "xe_tile.h"
> +
> +static void xe_sc_remove(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
> +{
> + struct xe_sc *sc = arg;
> + struct xe_device *xe;
> +
> + if (!sc)
> + return;
> +
> + xe = to_xe_device(drm);
> +
> + mutex_destroy(&sc->cmd_lock);
> +
> + xe_soc_remapper_set_sysctrl_region(xe, 0);
> +
> + xe->sc = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static int xe_sc_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + struct xe_tile *tile = xe_device_get_root_tile(xe);
> + struct xe_sc *sc;
> + int ret;
> +
> + sc = drmm_kzalloc(&xe->drm, sizeof(*sc), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!sc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + sc->xe = xe;
Using container_of would avoid the need for an explicit back pointer.
> + xe->sc = sc;
> +
> + ret = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, xe_sc_remove, sc);
> + if (ret) {
> + xe->sc = NULL;
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + xe_soc_remapper_set_sysctrl_region(xe, SYSCTRL_MAILBOX_INDEX);
> +
> + xe_mmio_init(&sc->mmio, tile, tile->mmio.regs, tile->mmio.regs_size);
Is it necessary to maintain sc->mmio? It seems we could use &tile->mmio
directly when accessing SC MB registers.
> +
> + mutex_init(&sc->cmd_lock);
> +
> + sc->phase_bit = 0;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_sc_init - Initialize SC subsystem
> + * @xe: xe device instance
> + *
> + * Entry point for SC initialization, called from xe_device_probe().
> + * This function checks platform support and calls the main probe function.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, error code on failure
> + */
> +int xe_sc_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!xe->info.has_sysctrl)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = xe_sc_probe(xe);
> + if (ret)
> + drm_err(&xe->drm, "sysctrl: Probe failed: %d\n", ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0e5c89ddc957
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __XE_SC_H__
> +#define __XE_SC_H__
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct xe_device;
> +
> +int xe_sc_init(struct xe_device *xe);
> +
> +#endif /* __XE_SC_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_mailbox.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_mailbox.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6f2500c63a3c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_mailbox.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,374 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/minmax.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#include <drm/drm_print.h>
> +
> +#include "regs/xe_sc_regs.h"
> +#include "xe_device.h"
> +#include "xe_mmio.h"
> +#include "xe_pm.h"
> +#include "xe_sc.h"
> +#include "xe_sc_mailbox.h"
> +#include "xe_sc_types.h"
> +
> +static bool sc_mb_wait_bit_clear(struct xe_sc *sc, u32 bit_mask,
> + unsigned int timeout_ms)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (timeout_ms == 0) {
> + ret = xe_mmio_wait32_not(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_CTRL, bit_mask, bit_mask,
> + 0, NULL, false);
> + } else {
> + ret = xe_mmio_wait32_not(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_CTRL, bit_mask, bit_mask,
> + timeout_ms * 1000, NULL, false);
This code can handle timeout_ms = 0 use case as well.
> + }
> +
> + return ret == 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool sc_mb_wait_bit_set(struct xe_sc *sc, u32 bit_mask,
> + unsigned int timeout_ms)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (timeout_ms == 0) {
> + ret = xe_mmio_wait32(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_CTRL, bit_mask, bit_mask,
> + 0, NULL, false);
> + } else {
> + ret = xe_mmio_wait32(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_CTRL, bit_mask, bit_mask,
> + timeout_ms * 1000, NULL, false);
Same as above.
> + }
> +
> + return ret == 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void sc_mb_write_frame(struct xe_sc *sc, const void *buffer,
> + size_t offset)
> +{
> + const u32 *data = (const u32 *)((const u8 *)buffer + offset);
> +
> + xe_mmio_write32(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_DATA0, data[0]);
> + xe_mmio_write32(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_DATA1, data[1]);
> + xe_mmio_write32(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_DATA2, data[2]);
> + xe_mmio_write32(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_DATA3, data[3]);
> +}
> +
> +static void sc_mb_read_frame(struct xe_sc *sc, void *buffer,
> + size_t offset)
> +{
> + u32 *data = (u32 *)((u8 *)buffer + offset);
> +
> + data[0] = xe_mmio_read32(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_DATA0);
> + data[1] = xe_mmio_read32(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_DATA1);
> + data[2] = xe_mmio_read32(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_DATA2);
> + data[3] = xe_mmio_read32(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_DATA3);
> +}
> +
> +static void sc_mb_clear_response(struct xe_sc *sc)
> +{
> + xe_mmio_write32(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_CTRL, SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY_OUT);
> +}
> +
> +static int sc_mb_prepare_command(struct xe_sc *sc,
> + const struct xe_sc_mailbox_app_msg_hdr *msg_hdr,
> + const void *data_in, size_t data_in_len,
> + u8 **cmd_buffer, size_t *cmd_size)
> +{
> + struct xe_sc_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr mkhi_hdr = {0};
> +
> + mkhi_hdr.group_id = msg_hdr->group_id;
> + mkhi_hdr.command = msg_hdr->command & 0x7F;
> + mkhi_hdr.is_response = 0;
> + mkhi_hdr.reserved = 0;
> + mkhi_hdr.result = 0;
> +
> + *cmd_size = sizeof(struct xe_sc_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr) + data_in_len;
> +
> + if (*cmd_size > SC_MB_MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE) {
> + drm_err(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Message too large: %zu bytes (max %u)\n",
> + *cmd_size, SC_MB_MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + *cmd_buffer = kmalloc(*cmd_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!*cmd_buffer)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + memcpy(*cmd_buffer, &mkhi_hdr, sizeof(struct xe_sc_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr));
> + if (data_in && data_in_len)
> + memcpy(*cmd_buffer + sizeof(struct xe_sc_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr),
> + data_in, data_in_len);
> +
> + drm_dbg(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: request: group=0x%02x cmd=0x%02x payload=%zu bytes\n",
> + mkhi_hdr.group_id, mkhi_hdr.command, data_in_len);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sc_mb_send_frames(struct xe_sc *sc, const u8 *cmd_buffer,
> + size_t cmd_size, unsigned int timeout_ms)
> +{
> + u32 ctrl_reg, total_frames, current_frame;
> + size_t bytes_sent, bytes_to_send;
> +
> + total_frames = DIV_ROUND_UP(cmd_size, SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE);
> + if (total_frames > SC_MB_MAX_FRAMES) {
> + drm_err(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Message too large: %zu bytes (%u frames, max %u)\n",
> + cmd_size, total_frames, SC_MB_MAX_FRAMES);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (!sc_mb_wait_bit_clear(sc, SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY, timeout_ms)) {
> + drm_err(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Mailbox busy (RUN_BUSY timeout)\n");
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + sc->phase_bit ^= 1;
> +
> + drm_dbg(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Sending message: %zu bytes, %u frames, phase=%u\n",
> + cmd_size, total_frames, sc->phase_bit);
> +
> + bytes_sent = 0;
> + for (current_frame = 0; current_frame < total_frames; current_frame++) {
> + bytes_to_send = min(cmd_size - bytes_sent, (size_t)SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE);
> +
> + sc_mb_write_frame(sc, cmd_buffer, bytes_sent);
> +
> + ctrl_reg = SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY |
> + FIELD_PREP(MKHI_FRAME_CURRENT, current_frame) |
> + FIELD_PREP(MKHI_FRAME_TOTAL, total_frames - 1) |
> + FIELD_PREP(MKHI_FRAME_COMMAND, SC_MKHI_COMMAND);
> + if (sc->phase_bit)
> + ctrl_reg |= FIELD_PREP(MKHI_FRAME_PHASE, 1);
> +
> + xe_mmio_write32(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_CTRL, ctrl_reg);
> +
> + drm_dbg(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Sent frame %u/%u\n",
> + current_frame, total_frames - 1);
> +
> + if (!sc_mb_wait_bit_clear(sc, SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY, timeout_ms)) {
> + drm_err(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Frame %u acknowledgment timeout\n",
> + current_frame);
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + bytes_sent += bytes_to_send;
> + }
> +
> + drm_dbg(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: All frames sent successfully (%zu bytes)\n", bytes_sent);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sc_mb_validate_response_header(struct xe_sc *sc,
> + const struct xe_sc_mailbox_app_msg_hdr *msg_hdr,
> + const struct xe_sc_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr *resp_hdr)
> +{
> + if (!resp_hdr->is_response ||
> + resp_hdr->group_id != msg_hdr->group_id ||
> + resp_hdr->command != (msg_hdr->command & 0x7F)) {
> + drm_err(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Invalid response header\n");
> + return -EPROTO;
> + }
> +
> + if (resp_hdr->result != 0) {
> + drm_err(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Firmware error: result=0x%02x\n",
> + resp_hdr->result);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + drm_dbg(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: response: group=0x%02x cmd=0x%02x\n",
> + resp_hdr->group_id, resp_hdr->command);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sc_mb_receive_frames(struct xe_sc *sc,
> + const struct xe_sc_mailbox_app_msg_hdr *msg_hdr,
> + void *data_out, size_t data_out_len,
> + size_t *bytes_received, unsigned int timeout_ms)
> +{
> + u32 ctrl_reg, total_frames, current_frame;
> + size_t payload_size;
> + int ret;
> +
> + *bytes_received = 0;
> +
> + do {
> + ctrl_reg = xe_mmio_read32(&sc->mmio, SC_MB_CTRL);
> + current_frame = FIELD_GET(MKHI_FRAME_CURRENT, ctrl_reg);
> + total_frames = FIELD_GET(MKHI_FRAME_TOTAL, ctrl_reg) + 1;
> +
> + drm_dbg(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Receiving frame %u/%u\n",
> + current_frame, total_frames - 1);
> +
> + if (current_frame == 0) {
> + u32 temp_frame[4];
> + struct xe_sc_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr *resp_hdr;
> +
> + sc_mb_read_frame(sc, temp_frame, 0);
> + resp_hdr = (struct xe_sc_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr *)temp_frame;
> +
> + ret = sc_mb_validate_response_header(sc, msg_hdr, resp_hdr);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + payload_size = SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE - sizeof(struct xe_sc_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr);
> + if (payload_size > data_out_len) {
> + drm_err(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Response buffer too small\n");
> + return -ENOSPC;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(data_out,
> + (u8 *)temp_frame + sizeof(struct xe_sc_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr),
> + payload_size);
> + *bytes_received = payload_size;
> + } else {
> + size_t frame_size = SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE;
> +
> + if (current_frame == total_frames - 1) {
> + size_t total_response = (total_frames - 1) *
> + SC_MB_FRAME_SIZE +
> + sizeof(struct xe_sc_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr);
> + size_t remaining = total_response -
> + *bytes_received -
> + sizeof(struct xe_sc_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr);
> + frame_size = min(frame_size, remaining);
> + }
> +
> + if (*bytes_received + frame_size > data_out_len) {
> + drm_err(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Response buffer too small\n");
> + return -ENOSPC;
> + }
> +
> + sc_mb_read_frame(sc, data_out, *bytes_received);
> + *bytes_received += frame_size;
> + }
> +
> + sc_mb_clear_response(sc);
> +
> + if (current_frame + 1 < total_frames &&
> + !sc_mb_wait_bit_set(sc, SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY_OUT, timeout_ms)) {
> + drm_err(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Response frame %u timeout\n",
> + current_frame + 1);
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + } while (current_frame + 1 < total_frames);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sc_mb_send_command(struct xe_sc *sc,
> + const struct xe_sc_mailbox_app_msg_hdr *msg_hdr,
> + const u8 *cmd_buffer, size_t cmd_size,
> + void *data_out, size_t data_out_len,
> + size_t *rdata_len, unsigned int timeout_ms)
> +{
> + size_t bytes_received;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (rdata_len)
> + *rdata_len = 0;
> +
> + ret = sc_mb_send_frames(sc, cmd_buffer, cmd_size, timeout_ms);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!data_out) {
> + drm_dbg(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Command completed (no response expected)\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (!sc_mb_wait_bit_set(sc, SC_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY_OUT, timeout_ms)) {
> + drm_err(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Response timeout (RUN_BUSY_OUT not set)\n");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + ret = sc_mb_receive_frames(sc, msg_hdr, data_out, data_out_len,
> + &bytes_received, timeout_ms);
> + if (ret) {
> + sc_mb_clear_response(sc);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (rdata_len)
> + *rdata_len = bytes_received;
> +
> + drm_dbg(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: MKHI message completed: %zu bytes payload received\n",
> + bytes_received);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_sc_mailbox_send_command - Send command to System Controller via mailbox
> + * @handle: XE device handle containing the system controller
> + * @cmd_buffer: Pointer to xe_sc_mailbox_command structure
> + * @rdata_len: Pointer to store actual response data size (can be NULL)
> + *
> + * Send a command to the System Controller using MKHI protocol. Handles
> + * command preparation, fragmentation, transmission, and response reception.
> + * Optimized to move memory allocation outside the critical section.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure
> + */
> +int xe_sc_mailbox_send_command(void *handle, void *cmd_buffer, size_t *rdata_len)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = handle;
> + struct xe_sc *sc;
> + struct xe_sc_mailbox_command *cmd = cmd_buffer;
> + u8 *command_buffer = NULL;
> + size_t command_size;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!xe || !cmd)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + sc = xe->sc;
> + if (!sc)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (!cmd->data_in && cmd->data_in_len)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!cmd->data_out && cmd->data_out_len)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + might_sleep();
> +
> + ret = sc_mb_prepare_command(sc, &cmd->header, cmd->data_in, cmd->data_in_len,
> + &command_buffer, &command_size);
> + if (ret) {
> + drm_err(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Failed to prepare command: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&sc->cmd_lock);
> +
> + xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
Will suggest to get lock at this place i.e. after resuming the device.
> +
> + ret = sc_mb_send_command(sc, &cmd->header, command_buffer, command_size,
> + cmd->data_out, cmd->data_out_len, rdata_len,
> + SC_MB_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MS);
> + if (ret)
> + drm_err(&sc->xe->drm, "SC: Mailbox command failed: %d\n", ret);
release lock here.
> +
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&sc->cmd_lock);
> +
> + kfree(command_buffer);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_mailbox.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_mailbox.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d5ca43c40f1a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_mailbox.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __XE_SC_MAILBOX_H__
> +#define __XE_SC_MAILBOX_H__
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct xe_sc;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct xe_sc_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr - MKHI protocol message header
> + */
> +struct xe_sc_mailbox_mkhi_msg_hdr {
> + /** @group_id: Message group identifier */
> + u32 group_id : 8;
> + /** @command: Command identifier within the group */
> + u32 command : 7;
> + /** @is_response: Response flag - 0 for request, 1 for response */
> + u32 is_response : 1;
> + /** @reserved: Reserved field, must be zero */
> + u32 reserved : 8;
> + /** @result: Result code from firmware */
> + u32 result : 8;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct xe_sc_mailbox_app_msg_hdr - Application message header
> + */
> +struct xe_sc_mailbox_app_msg_hdr {
> + /** @group_id: Application group identifier */
> + u32 group_id : 8;
> + /** @command: Specific command within the application group */
> + u32 command : 8;
> + /** @version: Protocol version */
> + u32 version : 8;
> + /** @reserved: Reserved field, must be zero */
> + u32 reserved : 8;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct xe_sc_mailbox_command - System Controller mailbox command structure
> + */
> +struct xe_sc_mailbox_command {
> + /** @header: Application message header containing command information */
> + struct xe_sc_mailbox_app_msg_hdr header;
> + /** @data_in: Pointer to input payload data (can be NULL if no input data) */
> + void *data_in;
> + /** @data_in_len: Size of input payload in bytes (0 if no input data) */
> + size_t data_in_len;
> + /** @data_out: Pointer to output buffer for response data (can be NULL if no response) */
> + void *data_out;
> + /** @data_out_len: Size of output buffer in bytes (0 if no response expected) */
> + size_t data_out_len;
> +};
> +
> +int xe_sc_mailbox_send_command(void *handle, void *cmd_buffer, size_t *rdata_len);
> +
> +#endif /* __XE_SC_MAILBOX_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_types.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5ec2126cebe4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sc_types.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _XE_SC_TYPES_H_
> +#define _XE_SC_TYPES_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/completion.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> +
> +#include "xe_device_types.h"
> +#include "xe_sc_mailbox.h"
> +
> +struct xe_device;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct xe_sc - System Controller driver context
> + */
> +struct xe_sc {
> + /** @xe: Back pointer to xe_device */
> + struct xe_device *xe;
As mentioned above, drop this. Either use container_of to get xe or
instead of passing struct xe_sc to mailbox functions pass struct xe.
> + /** @mmio: MMIO region for SC registers */
> + struct xe_mmio mmio;
As mentioned above. No need to maintain this, just use root time mmio.
> +
> + /** @cmd_lock: Mutex protecting mailbox command operations */
> + struct mutex cmd_lock;
> +
> + /** @phase_bit: MKHI message boundary phase toggle bit */
> + u32 phase_bit;
> +};
This structure can go inside struct xe_device.
Thanks,
Badal
> +
> +#endif /* _XE_SC_TYPES_H_ */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-18 5:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-22 4:58 [RFC 0/5] drm/xe: Add System Controller support for Xe3p dGPU platforms Anoop, Vijay
2025-11-22 4:58 ` [RFC 1/5] drm/xe/soc_remapper: Initialize SoC remapper during Xe probe Anoop, Vijay
2025-11-22 18:51 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-22 4:58 ` [RFC 2/5] drm/xe/soc_remapper: Use SoC remapper herlper from VSEC code Anoop, Vijay
2025-11-22 18:57 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-22 4:58 ` [RFC 3/5] drm/xe/soc_remapper: Add system controller config for SoC remapper Anoop, Vijay
2025-11-22 4:58 ` [RFC 4/5] drm/xe/remapper: Reprogram remapper index on PM resume events Anoop, Vijay
2025-11-22 4:58 ` [RFC 5/5] drm/xe/sc: Add system controller component for Xe3p dGPU platforms Anoop, Vijay
2025-11-22 5:14 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-22 5:21 ` Matthew Brost
2025-11-22 19:18 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-03 0:52 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-12-04 0:34 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-12-18 5:43 ` Nilawar, Badal [this message]
2025-11-24 22:25 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add System Controller support " Patchwork
2025-11-24 22:26 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-24 23:11 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-25 1:20 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2eb63ba-2e7a-4270-847f-9598d56f3850@intel.com \
--to=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=anoop.c.vijay@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kam.nasim@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=mohamed.mansoor.v@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox