Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Auld,  Matthew" <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: "De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	"Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [RFC 3/5] drm/xe: move pat_table into device info
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 20:50:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd6f9e71374934e83cef3342245f6d8e7a85511f.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230829162840.73444-10-matthew.auld@intel.com>

On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 17:28 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> We need to able to know the max pat_index range for a given platform, as
> well being able to lookup the pat_index for a given platform in upcoming
> vm_bind uapi, where userspace can directly provide the pat_index. Move
> the platform definition of the pat_table into the device info with the
> idea of encoding more information about each pat_index in a future
> patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Pallavi Mishra <pallavi.mishra@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h |  3 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c          | 39 ++++++++++++++++++----------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h          |  3 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c          |  6 +++++
>  4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> index 5037b8c180b8..06235da647bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> @@ -238,6 +238,9 @@ struct xe_device {
>  		/** @enable_display: display enabled */
>  		u8 enable_display:1;
>  
> +		const u32 *pat_table;
> +		int pat_table_n_entries;
> +
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY)
>  		const struct intel_display_device_info *display;
>  		struct intel_display_runtime_info display_runtime;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c
> index a468655db956..f19f5d8dcd94 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c
> @@ -106,24 +106,17 @@ static void program_pat_mcr(struct xe_gt *gt, const u32 table[], int n_entries)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -void xe_pat_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> +int xe_pat_fill_info(struct xe_device *xe)
>  {
> -	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> -
>  	if (xe->info.platform == XE_METEORLAKE) {
> -		/*
> -		 * SAMedia register offsets are adjusted by the write methods
> -		 * and they target registers that are not MCR, while for normal
> -		 * GT they are MCR
> -		 */
> -		if (xe_gt_is_media_type(gt))
> -			program_pat(gt, mtl_pat_table, ARRAY_SIZE(mtl_pat_table));
> -		else
> -			program_pat_mcr(gt, mtl_pat_table, ARRAY_SIZE(mtl_pat_table));
> +		xe->info.pat_table = mtl_pat_table;
> +		xe->info.pat_table_n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(mtl_pat_table);
>  	} else if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC || xe->info.platform == XE_DG2) {
> -		program_pat_mcr(gt, pvc_pat_table, ARRAY_SIZE(pvc_pat_table));
> +		xe->info.pat_table = pvc_pat_table;
> +		xe->info.pat_table_n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(pvc_pat_table);

I guess DG2 should use PVC entries with CLOS0?

What about DG1? TGL table is based around LLC.

>  	} else if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) <= 1210) {
> -		program_pat(gt, tgl_pat_table, ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_pat_table));
> +		xe->info.pat_table = tgl_pat_table;
> +		xe->info.pat_table_n_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_pat_table);
>  	} else {
>  		/*
>  		 * Going forward we expect to need new PAT settings for most
> @@ -135,7 +128,25 @@ void xe_pat_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
>  		 */
>  		drm_err(&xe->drm, "Missing PAT table for platform with graphics version %d.%2d!\n",
>  			GRAPHICS_VER(xe), GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) % 100);
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void xe_pat_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> +{
> +	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * SAMedia register offsets are adjusted by the write methods
> +	 * and they target registers that are not MCR, while for normal
> +	 * GT they are MCR.
> +	 */
> +	if (xe_gt_is_media_type(gt) || GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) < 1255)
> +		program_pat(gt, xe->info.pat_table, xe->info.pat_table_n_entries);
> +	else
> +		program_pat_mcr(gt, xe->info.pat_table, xe->info.pat_table_n_entries);
>  }
>  
>  void xe_pte_pat_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h
> index 54022f591621..9ab059758ad1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h
> @@ -26,8 +26,9 @@
>  #define XELPG_PAT_WB_CACHE_1_WAY       3
>  
>  struct xe_gt;
> -extern struct xe_device *xe;
> +struct xe_device;
>  
> +int xe_pat_fill_info(struct xe_device *xe);
>  void xe_pat_init(struct xe_gt *gt);
>  void xe_pte_pat_init(struct xe_device *xe);
>  unsigned int xe_pat_get_index(struct xe_device *xe, enum xe_cache_level cache);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> index 791107dec045..24f2021aae22 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  #include "xe_gt.h"
>  #include "xe_macros.h"
>  #include "xe_module.h"
> +#include "xe_pat.h"
>  #include "xe_pci_types.h"
>  #include "xe_pm.h"
>  #include "xe_step.h"
> @@ -553,6 +554,7 @@ static int xe_info_init(struct xe_device *xe,
>  	struct xe_tile *tile;
>  	struct xe_gt *gt;
>  	u8 id;
> +	int err;
>  
>  	xe->info.platform = desc->platform;
>  	xe->info.subplatform = subplatform_desc ?
> @@ -601,6 +603,10 @@ static int xe_info_init(struct xe_device *xe,
>  	xe->info.enable_display = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY) &&
>  				  enable_display &&
>  				  desc->has_display;
> +
> +	err = xe_pat_fill_info(xe);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
>  	/*
>  	 * All platforms have at least one primary GT.  Any platform with media
>  	 * version 13 or higher has an additional dedicated media GT.  And


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-05 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-29 16:28 [Intel-xe] [RFC 0/5] PAT and cache coherency support Matthew Auld
2023-08-29 16:28 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC 1/5] drm/xe/uapi: Add support for cache and coherency mode Matthew Auld
2023-08-29 18:09   ` Matt Roper
2023-08-30 11:13     ` Matthew Auld
2023-09-04 20:00   ` Souza, Jose
2023-09-05  9:04     ` Matthew Auld
2023-09-05 15:30       ` Souza, Jose
2023-08-29 16:28 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC 2/5] drm/xe: fix has_llc on rkl Matthew Auld
2023-08-29 18:46   ` Matt Roper
2023-08-30  1:20   ` Mishra, Pallavi
2023-08-29 16:28 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC 3/5] drm/xe: move pat_table into device info Matthew Auld
2023-08-29 19:14   ` Matt Roper
2023-08-29 21:49   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-08-29 22:20     ` Matt Roper
2023-08-30  9:34       ` Matthew Auld
2023-08-30  9:43     ` Matthew Auld
2023-08-30  5:14   ` Mishra, Pallavi
2023-09-05 20:50   ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2023-08-29 16:28 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC 4/5] drm/xe/pat: annotate pat_index with coherency mode Matthew Auld
2023-08-29 21:08   ` Matt Roper
2023-08-30  9:32     ` Matthew Auld
2023-08-30 19:40       ` Matt Roper
2023-08-29 22:02   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-08-29 16:28 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC 5/5] drm/xe/uapi: support pat_index selection with vm_bind Matthew Auld
2023-08-29 21:36   ` Matt Roper
2023-08-30  6:38     ` Thomas Hellström
2023-08-30 19:28       ` Matt Roper
2023-08-30 11:28     ` Matthew Auld
2023-08-30 15:27       ` Zhang, Carl
2023-08-30 16:02         ` Matthew Auld
2023-08-31  8:24           ` Zhang, Carl
2023-08-31 10:44             ` Matthew Auld
2023-09-01  9:34               ` Zhang, Carl
2023-09-04  9:23                 ` Matthew Auld
2023-09-05  9:12                   ` Zhang, Carl
2023-09-05  9:46                     ` Matthew Auld
2023-09-05 13:50                       ` Zhang, Carl
2023-09-05 14:07                         ` Matthew Auld
2023-09-04 20:21   ` Souza, Jose
2023-09-05  9:08     ` Matthew Auld
2023-09-07 18:56   ` Souza, Jose
2023-09-08  6:51     ` Matthew Auld
2023-09-13 15:35       ` Souza, Jose
2023-09-13 15:50         ` Matthew Auld
2023-08-29 16:40 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for PAT and cache coherency support Patchwork
2023-09-04 20:25 ` [Intel-xe] [RFC 0/5] " Souza, Jose
2023-09-05  9:16   ` Matthew Auld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fd6f9e71374934e83cef3342245f6d8e7a85511f.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox