Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dnyaneshwar Bhadane" <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/12] drm/xe/vram: Report VRAM errors using structured xe_log API
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 21:19:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-163385@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007211417.2093611-13-dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] xe: structured log location hardcoded to device instead of tile
--

commit 21686fbec5b38511b4c76320b0afbe7eefda858f
Author: Dnyaneshwar Bhadane <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>

drm/xe/vram: Report VRAM errors using structured xe_log API

This commit replaces standard DRM log macros with structured xe_log API
functions in xe_vram.c. It intends to update the VRAM initialization path to
correctly report whether a "no CPU visible VRAM" error is at the tile or
device level depending on the caller's context.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c
> index 2441ffe77edb2..d44a92e97195d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -254,8 +255,9 @@ static int vram_region_init(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_vram_region *vram,
>  	vram->io_size = min_t(u64, usable_size, remain_io_size);
>  
>  	if (!vram->io_size) {
> -		drm_err(&xe->drm, "%s without any CPU visible VRAM. Aborting.\n",
> -			tile ? "Tile" : "Device");
> +		xe_log_err_fatal(xe, VRAM, -ENODEV,
> +				 "%s without any CPU visible VRAM. Aborting.\n",
> +				 tile ? "Tile" : "Device");

[Severity: Medium]
Is it possible that passing xe unconditionally here causes the telemetry
metadata to incorrectly tag tile-specific errors as device-level errors?

The xe_log API deduces the structured log location from the pointer type of its
first argument. By passing the struct xe_device *xe pointer unconditionally,
the telemetry location appears to be permanently recorded as a device-level
error, while only the human-readable string receives the tile context.

Could the first argument conditionally pass the tile pointer when it is
non-NULL to fulfill the commit message's intent?

>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261007211417.2093611-1-dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com?part=12

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-07 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-07 21:14 [PATCH v5 00/12] drm/xe: Convert IO_BUS errors to structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] drm/xe/log: Add VRAM, PAT, and HWMON DRIVER_HARDWARE components Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-08 13:59   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] drm/xe/ggtt: Report GGTT errors using structured logging Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] drm/xe/hwmon: Report errors using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-08 13:01   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] drm/xe/mmio: Report BAR mapping " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] drm/xe/memirq: Report " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] drm/xe/reg_sr: Report save-restore " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 13:45   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] drm/xe/pat: Return error from xe_pat_init_early() on unknown platform Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] drm/xe/pat: Report missing PAT table using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] drm/xe/pci: Report unknown GMDID versions " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] drm/xe/lmtt: Report invalidation errors " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-08 13:07   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] drm/xe/vram: Report tile vs device VRAM visibility errors Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-08 13:25   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-09 10:42     ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-10-07 21:14 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] drm/xe/vram: Report VRAM errors using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-10-07 21:19   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-07 21:40 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Convert IO_BUS errors to structured xe_log API (rev5) Patchwork
2026-10-07 21:42 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-10-07 22:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-08  2:59 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-163385@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox