From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Badal Nilawar" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] drm/xe/xe_ras: Add support to retrieve info queue data for CRI
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:40:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-165251@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009104602.1075405-19-badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] xe_ras: missing validation of operation_status in get_info_queue_data
--
commit 7080ef5206c9792b353853f321f38646d98e4924
Author: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
drm/xe/xe_ras: Add support to retrieve info queue data for CRI
Retrieve the RAS info queue data, in multiple chunks, and assemble it into
a flat buffer. A follow-up patch will use this data to prepare the CPER
error info.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
> index 5cfc9beff8c13..900319938fe54 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
[ ... ]
> +static int get_info_queue_data(struct xe_device *xe,
> + struct xe_ras_get_info_queue_request *req,
> + struct xe_ras_get_info_queue_response *out)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + if (rlen != sizeof(response)) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: unexpected get info queue data response length %zu (expected %zu)\n",
> + rlen, sizeof(response));
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + hdr = &response.queue_response.header;
> + xe_dbg(xe, "[RAS]: info queue data: status=%u chunk_size=%u flags=0x%x\n",
> + response.operation_status, hdr->chunk_size, hdr->flags);
> +
> + *out = response;
> + return 0;
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
Does this code need to validate response.operation_status and return an error
if the firmware operation failed?
get_info_queue_data() executes the XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_GET_INFO_QUEUE mailbox
command to fetch chunks from the firmware. The firmware response includes an
operation_status field to indicate whether the request was successful or
rejected (e.g., due to an invalid session ID or out-of-bounds offset).
However, this only logs the status in a debug message and unconditionally
returns 0 (success). Because it fails to return an error (such as converting
the status via ras_status_to_errno()), the caller
xe_ras_drain_info_queue_raw() will proceed to validate and process the
payload. If the firmware did not populate the payload on error, it will
contain zeroes or garbage, resulting in a confusing "invalid info queue
chunk" warning or silent failure, rather than properly halting the fetch
with the correct error code.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261009104602.1075405-14-badal.nilawar@intel.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 10:46 [PATCH v4 00/12] Add CPER logging support for CRI Badal Nilawar
2026-10-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] drm/xe/cper: Add CPER reporting entry point for xe_log Badal Nilawar
2026-10-09 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 12:17 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-10-12 6:18 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] drm/xe/cper: Retrieve the error counter record for CPER reporting Badal Nilawar
2026-10-09 10:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 12:27 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-10-12 9:07 ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] drm/xe/cper: Initialize Intel-specific error section header Badal Nilawar
2026-10-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] drm/xe/cper: Construct CPER record for hardware errors Badal Nilawar
2026-10-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] drm/xe/xe_ras: Add support to retrieve info queue data for CRI Badal Nilawar
2026-10-09 10:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-09 12:45 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-10-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] drm/xe/cper: Prepare Intel CPER error info records Badal Nilawar
2026-10-09 10:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 13:07 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-10-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] drm/xe/cper: Log CPER records for aggregate counter retrieval Badal Nilawar
2026-10-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] drm/xe/cper: Emit cper record to trace buf Badal Nilawar
2026-10-09 10:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] drm/xe/xe_ras: Report device memory errors using SIGID Badal Nilawar
2026-10-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] drm/xe/xe_ras: Report core compute " Badal Nilawar
2026-10-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] drm/xe/xe_ras: Report soc internal " Badal Nilawar
2026-10-09 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] drm/xe/xe_ras: Report correctable " Badal Nilawar
2026-10-09 10:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 10:54 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add CPER logging support for CRI (rev4) Patchwork
2026-10-09 10:56 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-10-09 12:03 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-10-09 15:13 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: success " Patchwork
2026-10-12 6:14 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] Add CPER logging support for CRI Raag Jadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-165251@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox