From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: procfs {tid,tgid,attr}_allowed mount options
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:02:27 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110810100227.GA3507@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110804112331.GA2563@albatros>
Solar,
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 15:23 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> New version. Cleanups/fixes here and there.
One question: do we really need gid= option? The only user I know is
identd, but does anybody use it nowadays?
With gid= I see 2 drawbacks:
1) Code becomes worse because of additional permission checks.
2) From the upstream's point of view it is very limited and unextendable
feature.
So, I'd go further without gid=, at least for the beginning.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-10 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110603191153.GB514@openwall.com>
2011-06-04 5:47 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: procfs mount options Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-04 13:20 ` [kernel-hardening] " Solar Designer
2011-06-04 20:09 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-04 20:59 ` Solar Designer
2011-06-05 18:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v1] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-05 19:26 ` Solar Designer
2011-06-05 19:47 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-05 20:10 ` Solar Designer
2011-06-06 18:08 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-06 18:33 ` Solar Designer
2011-06-08 17:23 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v2] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-08 17:43 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-12 2:39 ` Solar Designer
2011-07-24 18:55 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
[not found] ` <20110724185036.GC3510@albatros>
2011-07-26 14:50 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-29 17:47 ` [kernel-hardening] procfs {tid,tgid,attr}_allowed " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-04 11:23 ` [kernel-hardening] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-10 10:02 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2011-08-10 11:22 ` [kernel-hardening] " Solar Designer
2011-08-10 11:25 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-10 12:04 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-10 13:34 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 18:14 ` Simon Marechal
2011-06-06 19:20 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v1] procfs " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-05 19:17 ` [kernel-hardening] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-05 19:40 ` Solar Designer
2011-06-05 19:53 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-05 18:36 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [owl-dev] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-05 18:47 ` [kernel-hardening] " Solar Designer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110810100227.GA3507@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox