* [usb:usb-next 100/101] drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:26:30: sparse: symbol 'pci_platdata' was n
@ 2012-07-07 17:21 wfg
2012-07-09 7:09 ` [usb:usb-next 100/101] drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:26:30: sparse: symbol 'pci_platdata' w Richard Zhao
2012-07-09 7:16 ` Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wfg @ 2012-07-07 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 898 bytes --]
Hi Richard,
There are new sparse warnings show up in
tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git usb-next
head: 336c5c310e8f0d5baba7973765339eaf5d989fe1
commit: 77c4400f2f0fd8384ab5cbe41d81ccc664896b2d [100/101] USB: Chipidea: rename struct ci13xxx_udc_driver to struct ci13xxx_platform_data
All sparse warnings:
+ drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:26:30: sparse: symbol 'pci_platdata' was not declared. Should it be static?
+ drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:31:30: sparse: symbol 'langwell_pci_platdata' was not declared. Should it be static?
+ drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:36:30: sparse: symbol 'penwell_pci_platdata' was not declared. Should it be static?
Please consider folding the attached diff :-)
---
0-DAY kernel build testing backend Open Source Technology Centre
Fengguang Wu <wfg@linux.intel.com> Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: make-it-static-77c4400.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 915 bytes --]
diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c
index cdcac3a..5ce8698 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c
@@ -23,17 +23,17 @@
/******************************************************************************
* PCI block
*****************************************************************************/
-struct ci13xxx_platform_data pci_platdata = {
+static struct ci13xxx_platform_data pci_platdata = {
.name = UDC_DRIVER_NAME,
.capoffset = DEF_CAPOFFSET,
};
-struct ci13xxx_platform_data langwell_pci_platdata = {
+static struct ci13xxx_platform_data langwell_pci_platdata = {
.name = UDC_DRIVER_NAME,
.capoffset = 0,
};
-struct ci13xxx_platform_data penwell_pci_platdata = {
+static struct ci13xxx_platform_data penwell_pci_platdata = {
.name = UDC_DRIVER_NAME,
.capoffset = 0,
.power_budget = 200,
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [usb:usb-next 100/101] drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:26:30: sparse: symbol 'pci_platdata' w
2012-07-07 17:21 [usb:usb-next 100/101] drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:26:30: sparse: symbol 'pci_platdata' was n wfg
@ 2012-07-09 7:09 ` Richard Zhao
2012-07-09 7:16 ` Fengguang Wu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Zhao @ 2012-07-09 7:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 01:21:37AM +0800, wfg@linux.intel.com wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> There are new sparse warnings show up in
>
> tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git usb-next
> head: 336c5c310e8f0d5baba7973765339eaf5d989fe1
> commit: 77c4400f2f0fd8384ab5cbe41d81ccc664896b2d [100/101] USB: Chipidea: rename struct ci13xxx_udc_driver to struct ci13xxx_platform_data
>
> All sparse warnings:
>
> + drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:26:30: sparse: symbol 'pci_platdata' was not declared. Should it be static?
> + drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:31:30: sparse: symbol 'langwell_pci_platdata' was not declared. Should it be static?
> + drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:36:30: sparse: symbol 'penwell_pci_platdata' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Please consider folding the attached diff :-)
There' already a patch in mail list. http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg181694.html
Thanks
Richard
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel build testing backend Open Source Technology Centre
> Fengguang Wu <wfg@linux.intel.com> Intel Corporation
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c
> index cdcac3a..5ce8698 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c
> @@ -23,17 +23,17 @@
> /******************************************************************************
> * PCI block
> *****************************************************************************/
> -struct ci13xxx_platform_data pci_platdata = {
> +static struct ci13xxx_platform_data pci_platdata = {
> .name = UDC_DRIVER_NAME,
> .capoffset = DEF_CAPOFFSET,
> };
>
> -struct ci13xxx_platform_data langwell_pci_platdata = {
> +static struct ci13xxx_platform_data langwell_pci_platdata = {
> .name = UDC_DRIVER_NAME,
> .capoffset = 0,
> };
>
> -struct ci13xxx_platform_data penwell_pci_platdata = {
> +static struct ci13xxx_platform_data penwell_pci_platdata = {
> .name = UDC_DRIVER_NAME,
> .capoffset = 0,
> .power_budget = 200,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [usb:usb-next 100/101] drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:26:30: sparse: symbol 'pci_platdata' w
2012-07-07 17:21 [usb:usb-next 100/101] drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:26:30: sparse: symbol 'pci_platdata' was n wfg
2012-07-09 7:09 ` [usb:usb-next 100/101] drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:26:30: sparse: symbol 'pci_platdata' w Richard Zhao
@ 2012-07-09 7:16 ` Fengguang Wu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2012-07-09 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 03:09:34PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 01:21:37AM +0800, wfg@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > There are new sparse warnings show up in
> >
> > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git usb-next
> > head: 336c5c310e8f0d5baba7973765339eaf5d989fe1
> > commit: 77c4400f2f0fd8384ab5cbe41d81ccc664896b2d [100/101] USB: Chipidea: rename struct ci13xxx_udc_driver to struct ci13xxx_platform_data
> >
> > All sparse warnings:
> >
> > + drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:26:30: sparse: symbol 'pci_platdata' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > + drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:31:30: sparse: symbol 'langwell_pci_platdata' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > + drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:36:30: sparse: symbol 'penwell_pci_platdata' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >
> > Please consider folding the attached diff :-)
> There' already a patch in mail list. http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg181694.html
OK, thanks!
Fengguang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-09 7:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-07 17:21 [usb:usb-next 100/101] drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:26:30: sparse: symbol 'pci_platdata' was n wfg
2012-07-09 7:09 ` [usb:usb-next 100/101] drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_pci.c:26:30: sparse: symbol 'pci_platdata' w Richard Zhao
2012-07-09 7:16 ` Fengguang Wu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox