Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>,
	Dave Young <ruirui.yang@linux.dev>,
	Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] crash_dump: Read the number of dm-crypt keys from reserved memory
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2026 17:56:11 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1af9064e-39cd-4701-b50d-3ee44fd87245@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anQkT6jwznGfzs1R@Rk>



On 06/08/26 11:50, Coiby Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 04:35:50PM +0530, Sourabh Jain wrote:
>> Hi Coiby,
>
> Hi Sourabh,
>
>>
>> On 29/07/26 09:06, Coiby Xu wrote:
>>> In case user adds/deletes the keys by mistake, it's safer to read the
>>> number of keys from reserved memory.
>>
>> I am not sure how we differentiate between a key being deleted 
>> accidentally and a user
>> intentionally deleting it. However, I have a question about how the 
>> kernel handles key
>> addition and removal.
>>
>> How does the kernel handle key add/remove operations to keep the 
>> kexec segment
>> corresponding to the key header up to date?
>>
>> The reason I am asking is to understand what happens when a user 
>> deletes a key. Does the
>> kexec segment corresponding to that key header still retain 
>> information about the deleted key?
>>
>> If it does, could you explain why? If it does not, could you explain 
>> how the kexec segment gets updated?
>
> Thanks for the questions! When a user delete a key by removing a
> configfs item, the kexec segment still retain information about the
> deleted key. The kexec segment will only be updated when the user tries
> to reload the kdump kernel. Because I think introducing a sync 
> mechanism to
> automatically update the kexec segment when there is a change to
> configfs is unnecessary.

Thanks for the clarification. So, the kexec segment retains the deleted key
information until the kdump kernel is reloaded.

>>
>> Also, for my understanding, could you please point me to what exactly 
>> is stored in the key header's kexec
>> segment? During restore, kernel access the old kernel memory using 
>> the information stored in that kexec
>> segment, so I would like to better understand what data it contains.
>
> What is stored can be known from struct keys_header and dm_crypt_key,
>
> struct dm_crypt_key {
>     unsigned int key_size;
>     char key_desc[KEY_DESC_MAX_LEN];
>     u8 data[KEY_SIZE_MAX];
> };
>
> struct keys_header {
>     unsigned int total_keys;
>     struct dm_crypt_key keys[] __counted_by(total_keys);
> } *keys_header;
>
> [...] 

Thanks for the pointer I will explore this.

- Sourabh Jain



  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-09 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-29  3:36 [PATCH v3 00/10] Bug fixes and enhancements for kdump LUKS support Coiby Xu
2026-07-29  3:36 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] crash_dump: release keyring reference at the correct time Coiby Xu
2026-07-29  3:36 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] crash_dump: Fix potential double free and UAF of keys_header Coiby Xu
2026-07-29  3:36 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] crash_dump: Disallow writing to dm-crypt configfs during kexec_file_load syscall Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 10:30   ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-06  5:20     ` Coiby Xu
2026-08-09 11:56       ` Sourabh Jain
2026-07-29  3:36 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] crash_dump: Read the number of dm-crypt keys from reserved memory Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 11:05   ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-06  6:20     ` Coiby Xu
2026-08-09 12:26       ` Sourabh Jain [this message]
2026-07-29  3:36 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] crash_dump: Free temporary dm-crypt keys_header buffer in kdump kernel Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 11:20   ` Sourabh Jain
2026-07-29  3:36 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] crash_dump: Only use kexec_dprintk during the kexec_file_load syscall Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 11:36   ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-06  5:27     ` Coiby Xu
2026-07-29  3:36 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] crash_dump: Improve readability of config_keys_restore_store Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 11:52   ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-06  6:26     ` Coiby Xu
2026-07-29  3:36 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] crash_dump: Check the function return codes in restore_dm_crypt_keys_to_thread_keyring Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 12:03   ` Sourabh Jain
2026-07-29  3:36 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] crash_dump: Disallow configfs/crash_dm_crypt_key/reuse if crash hotplug supported Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 12:09   ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-06  5:33     ` Coiby Xu
2026-08-09 12:06       ` Sourabh Jain
2026-07-29  3:36 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] Documentation: kdump: Add arm64 and ppc64le to encrypted dump target support list Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 12:10   ` Sourabh Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1af9064e-39cd-4701-b50d-3ee44fd87245@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
    --cc=coiby.xu@gmail.com \
    --cc=coxu@redhat.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ruirui.yang@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox