From: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>,
Dave Young <ruirui.yang@linux.dev>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] crash_dump: Read the number of dm-crypt keys from reserved memory
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2026 17:56:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1af9064e-39cd-4701-b50d-3ee44fd87245@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anQkT6jwznGfzs1R@Rk>
On 06/08/26 11:50, Coiby Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 04:35:50PM +0530, Sourabh Jain wrote:
>> Hi Coiby,
>
> Hi Sourabh,
>
>>
>> On 29/07/26 09:06, Coiby Xu wrote:
>>> In case user adds/deletes the keys by mistake, it's safer to read the
>>> number of keys from reserved memory.
>>
>> I am not sure how we differentiate between a key being deleted
>> accidentally and a user
>> intentionally deleting it. However, I have a question about how the
>> kernel handles key
>> addition and removal.
>>
>> How does the kernel handle key add/remove operations to keep the
>> kexec segment
>> corresponding to the key header up to date?
>>
>> The reason I am asking is to understand what happens when a user
>> deletes a key. Does the
>> kexec segment corresponding to that key header still retain
>> information about the deleted key?
>>
>> If it does, could you explain why? If it does not, could you explain
>> how the kexec segment gets updated?
>
> Thanks for the questions! When a user delete a key by removing a
> configfs item, the kexec segment still retain information about the
> deleted key. The kexec segment will only be updated when the user tries
> to reload the kdump kernel. Because I think introducing a sync
> mechanism to
> automatically update the kexec segment when there is a change to
> configfs is unnecessary.
Thanks for the clarification. So, the kexec segment retains the deleted key
information until the kdump kernel is reloaded.
>>
>> Also, for my understanding, could you please point me to what exactly
>> is stored in the key header's kexec
>> segment? During restore, kernel access the old kernel memory using
>> the information stored in that kexec
>> segment, so I would like to better understand what data it contains.
>
> What is stored can be known from struct keys_header and dm_crypt_key,
>
> struct dm_crypt_key {
> unsigned int key_size;
> char key_desc[KEY_DESC_MAX_LEN];
> u8 data[KEY_SIZE_MAX];
> };
>
> struct keys_header {
> unsigned int total_keys;
> struct dm_crypt_key keys[] __counted_by(total_keys);
> } *keys_header;
>
> [...]
Thanks for the pointer I will explore this.
- Sourabh Jain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-09 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-29 3:36 [PATCH v3 00/10] Bug fixes and enhancements for kdump LUKS support Coiby Xu
2026-07-29 3:36 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] crash_dump: release keyring reference at the correct time Coiby Xu
2026-07-29 3:36 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] crash_dump: Fix potential double free and UAF of keys_header Coiby Xu
2026-07-29 3:36 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] crash_dump: Disallow writing to dm-crypt configfs during kexec_file_load syscall Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 10:30 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-06 5:20 ` Coiby Xu
2026-08-09 11:56 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-07-29 3:36 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] crash_dump: Read the number of dm-crypt keys from reserved memory Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 11:05 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-06 6:20 ` Coiby Xu
2026-08-09 12:26 ` Sourabh Jain [this message]
2026-07-29 3:36 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] crash_dump: Free temporary dm-crypt keys_header buffer in kdump kernel Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 11:20 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-07-29 3:36 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] crash_dump: Only use kexec_dprintk during the kexec_file_load syscall Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 11:36 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-06 5:27 ` Coiby Xu
2026-07-29 3:36 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] crash_dump: Improve readability of config_keys_restore_store Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 11:52 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-06 6:26 ` Coiby Xu
2026-07-29 3:36 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] crash_dump: Check the function return codes in restore_dm_crypt_keys_to_thread_keyring Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 12:03 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-07-29 3:36 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] crash_dump: Disallow configfs/crash_dm_crypt_key/reuse if crash hotplug supported Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 12:09 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-06 5:33 ` Coiby Xu
2026-08-09 12:06 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-07-29 3:36 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] Documentation: kdump: Add arm64 and ppc64le to encrypted dump target support list Coiby Xu
2026-08-05 12:10 ` Sourabh Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1af9064e-39cd-4701-b50d-3ee44fd87245@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=coiby.xu@gmail.com \
--cc=coxu@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ruirui.yang@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox