public inbox for kexec@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, bp@alien8.de,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	kexec@lists.fedoraproject.org, vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] Add function get_bootparam
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:08:52 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131028060848.GA23660@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131028050645.GB15827@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com>

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:06:45PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 10/28/13 at 01:20pm, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:30:32AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > On 10/28/13 at 09:13am, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > > > @@ -447,7 +446,7 @@ void setup_subarch(struct x86_linux_para
> > > > > >  	if (!debugfs_mnt)
> > > > > >  		return;
> > > > > >  	snprintf(filename, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", debugfs_mnt, "boot_params/data");
> > > > > > -	filename[PATH_MAX-1] = 0;
> > > > > > +	filename[PATH_MAX - 1] = 0;
> > > > > >  	free(debugfs_mnt);
> > > > > 
> > > > > This change appears to be unrelated to the rest of the patch.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Will remove the change from the patch.
> > > 
> > > Relooking it, with this patch the line "filename[PATH_MAX - 1] = 0;"
> > > is in the share function get_bootparam, it's not in setup_subarch
> > > any more so I think it's ok, what do you think?
> > 
> > I'm a bit confused.
> > 
> > My reading of the hunk above is that it is a whitespace-only change.
> > If so it is not a change that I object to but also not one that
> > I feel belongs in this patch. If not I am somehow mistaken.
> 
> The diff context is cheating us, it might because of the context (+- 3 lines)
> is same with original setup_arch, but it is really moving to a new function.

Ok, in that case I have no objections.

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-28  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-27  4:04 [patch 0/4] kexec-tools: efi runtime support on kexec kernel dyoung
2013-10-27  4:04 ` [patch 1/4] Add function get_bootparam dyoung
2013-10-28  0:38   ` Simon Horman
2013-10-28  1:13     ` Dave Young
2013-10-28  2:30       ` Dave Young
2013-10-28  4:20         ` Simon Horman
2013-10-28  5:06           ` Dave Young
2013-10-28  6:08             ` Simon Horman [this message]
2013-10-27  4:04 ` [patch 2/4] remove extra acpi_rsdp command line for efi dyoung
2013-10-28  0:39   ` Simon Horman
2013-10-28  1:39     ` Dave Young
2013-10-28  9:42   ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-28  9:54     ` Dave Young
2013-10-28 10:12       ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-28 10:34         ` Dave Young
2013-10-28 10:39           ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-28 10:45             ` Dave Young
2013-10-28 10:51               ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-28 10:53                 ` Dave Young
2013-10-29  3:05                   ` Dave Young
2013-10-29  3:34                     ` Dave Young
2013-10-29  8:50                       ` Dave Young
2013-10-29 14:57                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-10-28 16:10                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-10-29  2:04                   ` Simon Horman
2013-10-29  2:36                     ` Dave Young
2013-10-29  3:18                       ` Dave Young
2013-10-30  0:45                       ` Simon Horman
2013-10-29 13:27                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-10-27  4:04 ` [patch 3/4] Add efi_info in x86 setup header dyoung
2013-10-27  4:04 ` [patch 4/4] Passing efi related data via setup_data dyoung
2013-10-28  0:37   ` Simon Horman
2013-10-28  1:12     ` Dave Young
2013-10-28  3:02       ` Dave Young
2013-10-28  4:16         ` Simon Horman
2013-10-28  1:28   ` Dave Young
2013-10-28 10:41   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-10-28 11:21     ` Dave Young

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131028060848.GA23660@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox