From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: dyoung@redhat.com
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
horms@verge.net.au, kexec@lists.fedoraproject.org,
ebiederm@xmission.com, hpa@zytor.com, bp@alien8.de,
vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] remove extra acpi_rsdp command line for efi
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:42:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131028094223.GA2335@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131027041231.024036396@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com>
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:04:39PM +0800, dyoung@redhat.com wrote:
> Removing code to pass acpi_rsdp because this
> patch series will support efi runtime, it's not
> necessary any more. EFI initialization code will
> take the functionality.
Won't this break kexec of old kernels that don't have the new UEFI setup
code?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-28 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-27 4:04 [patch 0/4] kexec-tools: efi runtime support on kexec kernel dyoung
2013-10-27 4:04 ` [patch 1/4] Add function get_bootparam dyoung
2013-10-28 0:38 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-28 1:13 ` Dave Young
2013-10-28 2:30 ` Dave Young
2013-10-28 4:20 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-28 5:06 ` Dave Young
2013-10-28 6:08 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-27 4:04 ` [patch 2/4] remove extra acpi_rsdp command line for efi dyoung
2013-10-28 0:39 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-28 1:39 ` Dave Young
2013-10-28 9:42 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2013-10-28 9:54 ` Dave Young
2013-10-28 10:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-28 10:34 ` Dave Young
2013-10-28 10:39 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-28 10:45 ` Dave Young
2013-10-28 10:51 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-28 10:53 ` Dave Young
2013-10-29 3:05 ` Dave Young
2013-10-29 3:34 ` Dave Young
2013-10-29 8:50 ` Dave Young
2013-10-29 14:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-10-28 16:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-10-29 2:04 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-29 2:36 ` Dave Young
2013-10-29 3:18 ` Dave Young
2013-10-30 0:45 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-29 13:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-10-27 4:04 ` [patch 3/4] Add efi_info in x86 setup header dyoung
2013-10-27 4:04 ` [patch 4/4] Passing efi related data via setup_data dyoung
2013-10-28 0:37 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-28 1:12 ` Dave Young
2013-10-28 3:02 ` Dave Young
2013-10-28 4:16 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-28 1:28 ` Dave Young
2013-10-28 10:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-10-28 11:21 ` Dave Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131028094223.GA2335@srcf.ucam.org \
--to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.fedoraproject.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox