From: "dyoung@redhat.com" <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: lijiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
Cc: "anderson@redhat.com" <anderson@redhat.com>,
Kazuhito Hagio <k-hagio@ab.jp.nec.com>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
"bhe@redhat.com" <bhe@redhat.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Remove the memory encryption mask to obtain the true physical address
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 11:55:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190125035531.GA19842@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <967a7a30-cead-e016-bd96-47d63181103d@redhat.com>
+ Tom
On 01/25/19 at 11:06am, lijiang wrote:
> 在 2019年01月24日 06:16, Kazuhito Hagio 写道:
> > On 1/22/2019 3:03 AM, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
> >> For AMD machine with SME feature, if SME is enabled in the first
> >> kernel, the crashed kernel's page table(pgd/pud/pmd/pte) contains
> >> the memory encryption mask, so makedumpfile needs to remove the
> >> memory encryption mask to obtain the true physical address.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86_64.c | 3 +++
> >> makedumpfile.c | 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86_64.c b/arch/x86_64.c
> >> index 537fb78..7651d36 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86_64.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86_64.c
> >> @@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ __vtop4_x86_64(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long pagetable)
> >> return NOT_PADDR;
> >> }
> >> pud_paddr = pgd & ENTRY_MASK;
> >> + pud_paddr = pud_paddr & ~(NUMBER(sme_mask));
> >> }
> >>
> >> /*
> >> @@ -371,6 +372,7 @@ __vtop4_x86_64(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long pagetable)
> >> * Get PMD.
> >> */
> >> pmd_paddr = pud_pte & ENTRY_MASK;
> >> + pmd_paddr = pmd_paddr & ~(NUMBER(sme_mask));
> >> pmd_paddr += pmd_index(vaddr) * sizeof(unsigned long);
> >> if (!readmem(PADDR, pmd_paddr, &pmd_pte, sizeof pmd_pte)) {
> >> ERRMSG("Can't get pmd_pte (pmd_paddr:%lx).\n", pmd_paddr);
> >> @@ -391,6 +393,7 @@ __vtop4_x86_64(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long pagetable)
> >> * Get PTE.
> >> */
> >> pte_paddr = pmd_pte & ENTRY_MASK;
> >> + pte_paddr = pte_paddr & ~(NUMBER(sme_mask));
> >> pte_paddr += pte_index(vaddr) * sizeof(unsigned long);
> >> if (!readmem(PADDR, pte_paddr, &pte, sizeof pte)) {
> >> ERRMSG("Can't get pte (pte_paddr:%lx).\n", pte_paddr);
> >> diff --git a/makedumpfile.c b/makedumpfile.c
> >> index a03aaa1..81c7bb4 100644
> >> --- a/makedumpfile.c
> >> +++ b/makedumpfile.c
> >> @@ -977,6 +977,7 @@ next_page:
> >> read_size = MIN(info->page_size - PAGEOFFSET(paddr), size);
> >>
> >> pgaddr = PAGEBASE(paddr);
> >> + pgaddr = pgaddr & ~(NUMBER(sme_mask));
> >
> > Since NUMBER(sme_mask) is initialized with -1 (NOT_FOUND_NUMBER),
> > if the sme_mask is not in vmcoreinfo, ~(NUMBER(sme_mask)) will be 0.
> > So the four lines added above need
> >
> > if (NUMBER(sme_mask) != NOT_FOUND_NUMBER)
> > ...
> >
>
> Thank you very much for pointing out my mistake.
>
> I will improve it and post again.
>
> > and, what I'm wondering is whether it doesn't need to take hugepages
> > into account such as this
> >
> > 392 if (pmd_pte & _PAGE_PSE) /* 2MB pages */
> > 393 return (pmd_pte & ENTRY_MASK & PMD_MASK) +
> > 394 (vaddr & ~PMD_MASK);
> > "arch/x86_64.c"
> >
>
> This is a good question. Theoretically, it should be modified accordingly for
> huge pages case.
>
> But makedumpfile still works well without this change. And i'm sure that the
> huge pages are enabled in crashed kernel. This is very strange.
>
> Thanks.
> Lianbo
>
> > Thanks,
> > Kazu
> >
> >
> >> pgbuf = cache_search(pgaddr, read_size);
> >> if (!pgbuf) {
> >> ++cache_miss;
> >> --
> >> 2.17.1
> >>
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-25 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-22 8:03 [PATCH 0/2] makedumpfile needs to remove the memory encryption Lianbo Jiang
2019-01-22 8:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] Makedumpfile: add a new variable 'sme_mask' to number_table Lianbo Jiang
2019-01-23 21:51 ` Kazuhito Hagio
2019-01-24 9:23 ` lijiang
2019-01-22 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] Remove the memory encryption mask to obtain the true physical address Lianbo Jiang
2019-01-23 22:16 ` Kazuhito Hagio
2019-01-24 19:33 ` Kazuhito Hagio
2019-01-25 3:17 ` lijiang
2019-01-25 3:06 ` lijiang
2019-01-25 3:55 ` dyoung [this message]
2019-01-25 14:32 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-01-28 1:55 ` lijiang
2019-01-28 3:15 ` lijiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190125035531.GA19842@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com \
--to=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=anderson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=k-hagio@ab.jp.nec.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lijiang@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox