Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
To: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, kexec@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 6/6] arm64: wait for transmit completion before next character transmission
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 05:01:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <553197BE.7060705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429291343.5479.22.camel@infradead.org>



On Friday 17 April 2015 10:52 PM, Geoff Levand wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 22:17 +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>> Previous transmission must be completed before next character to be
>> transmitted, otherwise TX buffer may saturate and we will not see all
>> the characters on screen.
>>
>> @@ -34,6 +38,8 @@ static const char arm64_opts_usage[] __attribute__ ((unused)) =
>>   "     --lite                Fast reboot, no memory integrity checks.\n"
>>   "     --page-offset         Kernel page-offset for binary image load.\n"
>>   "     --port=ADDRESS        Purgatory output to port ADDRESS.\n"
>> +"     --port-lsr=ADDRESS    Purgatory output port line status ADDRESS.\n"
>> +"     --port-lsr-val=VALUE  Purgatory output port Line status expected SET value when TX empty.\n"
>>   "     --ramdisk=FILE        Use FILE as the kernel initial ramdisk.\n"
>>   "     --reuse-cmdline       Use command line arg of primary kernel.\n";
>
> We just need to put some chars to the screen, so I want to avoid a lot
> of parameters.
>

I was not able to get even two lines print without it :(

> Usually the status register is at a fixed offset from the TX port.  Is
> that not the case for the ARM uarts?
>
> Can't we just poll port-lsr until empty then start writing again?  That
> will at least eliminate port-lsr-val.
>

infact my first version was using a direct offset with port. Both are 
fixed in most of the cases as offset 0x14 and value 0x60.

OK, I will remove the param for now. if someone finds any different 
values then later on we can add it.

~Pratyush

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-17 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-16 16:47 [PATCH RFC 0/6] Various fixes for purgatory and ARM64 Pratyush Anand
2015-04-16 16:47 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] purgatory: Fix memcmp for src address increment Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 16:55   ` Geoff Levand
2015-04-20  0:25     ` Simon Horman
2015-04-22 11:19       ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-23  2:23         ` Simon Horman
2015-04-16 16:47 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] purgatory: No need to sha256 update if ptr->len is zero Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 16:58   ` Geoff Levand
2015-04-17 23:26     ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-20  3:01   ` Baoquan He
2015-04-20  3:18     ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-16 16:47 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] arm64: allocate memory for other segments after kernel Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 16:59   ` Geoff Levand
2015-04-20  3:21   ` Baoquan He
2015-04-21  4:19     ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-21 10:06       ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-04-22  6:16         ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-04-16 16:47 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] arm64: support reuse-cmdline option Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 17:02   ` Geoff Levand
2015-04-16 16:47 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] arm64: Add support for binary image Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 17:07   ` Geoff Levand
2015-04-17 18:00     ` Geoff Levand
2015-04-17 23:27       ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-20  7:24   ` Baoquan He
2015-04-21  4:42     ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-22  2:53       ` Baoquan He
2015-04-22 11:19         ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-16 16:47 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] arm64: wait for transmit completion before next character transmission Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17  5:36   ` Minfei Huang
2015-04-17  5:37     ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-20  2:58       ` Baoquan He
2015-04-20  3:34         ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 17:22   ` Geoff Levand
2015-04-17 23:31     ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2015-04-16 23:54 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] Various fixes for purgatory and ARM64 Simon Horman
2015-04-17  1:27 ` Dave Young
2015-04-17  2:48   ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 17:27 ` Geoff Levand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=553197BE.7060705@redhat.com \
    --to=panand@redhat.com \
    --cc=geoff@infradead.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox