From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>,
zohar@linux.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, noodles@fb.com,
bauermann@kolabnow.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: code@tyhicks.com, nramas@linux.microsoft.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] ima: refactor ima_dump_measurement_list to move memory allocation to a separate function
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:50:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97927bf8-77d3-5117-7e49-41b76f308930@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f60a08b3-408b-05e0-2c91-9c19159c7fd2@linux.ibm.com>
On 10/20/23 14:21, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
> On 10/20/23 16:33, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
>> Thanks a lot Stefan for reviewing this series.
>> Really appreciate it.
>
>
> You are welcome.
>
> What may be a bit problematic is the fact that between the time the
> buffer for the flattened IMA log is allocated (kexec 'load') and the
> time it is filled (kexec 'exec') that the log may grow quite a bit. I
> would say that the size of the growths may depend a lot on how people
> are using their system that the additional kilobytes may or may not be
> enough. So a distro would probably have to specify additional bytes to
> allocate for like the worst case. But how many kilobytes is the worst case?
>
> Stefan
Yes. Its a genuine concern.
The window between kexec 'load' and 'execute' could be arbitrarily long.
(hours, days, months). And the log can grow quite a bit. And there is
always a possibility that it will run out of the extra allocated memory-
no matter how much we allocate at load.
We can never know with certainty - how many kilobytes is the worst case?
So I used another approach to address this issue.
I addressed this issue in patch 7/7 of this series[1] by measuring
a marker event ("kexec_execute") just before kexec 'execute'.
Also pasting the code from 7/7 below[1] for reference.
If IMA runs out of the extra allocated memory while copying the events,
this marker event ("kexec_execute") will not be present in the IMA log
when the system boots into the new Kernel.
So the event sequence in IMA log would be as follows:
IMA log
--------
'boot_aggregate' # clean boot
...
... # events before new kexec 'load'
...
'kexec_load'
...
...# arbitrary many more events
...
...
...
'kexec_execute'
#if this 'kexec_execute' event is missing after the
#system kexec soft boots into the new Kernel,
#i.e. between the two boot_aggregate events,
#it can be safely concluded that the IMA log
#ran out of memory in during kexec reboot,
#and now it is out of sync with PCR quotes
#and thus the system needs to be hard rebooted.
'boot_aggregate' # clean boot
...
... # events after kexec soft boot
...
This logic can effectively conclude if IMA log is out of
sync with the PCR quotes. If it is, then the remote
attestation service/client can take appropriate action
on the system (clean boot) to recover.
Hope this approach makes sense.
~Tushar
[1] [v2,7/7] ima: record log size at kexec load and execute
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-integrity/patch/20231005182602.634615-8-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com/
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
index 6cd5f46a7208..0f9c424fe808 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
#include "ima.h"
#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
+#define IMA_KEXEC_EVENT_LEN 128
+
struct seq_file ima_kexec_file;
struct ima_kexec_hdr ima_khdr;
static void *ima_kexec_buffer;
@@ -34,6 +36,8 @@ void ima_clear_kexec_file(void)
static int ima_alloc_kexec_buf(size_t kexec_segment_size)
{
+ char ima_kexec_event[IMA_KEXEC_EVENT_LEN];
+
if ((kexec_segment_size == 0) ||
(kexec_segment_size == ULONG_MAX) ||
((kexec_segment_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) > totalram_pages() / 2)) {
@@ -64,6 +68,12 @@ static int ima_alloc_kexec_buf(size_t
kexec_segment_size)
memset(&ima_khdr, 0, sizeof(ima_khdr));
ima_khdr.version = 1;
+ scnprintf(ima_kexec_event, IMA_KEXEC_EVENT_LEN,
+ "kexec_segment_size=%lu;", kexec_segment_size);
+
+ ima_measure_critical_data("ima_kexec", "kexec_load", ima_kexec_event,
+ strlen(ima_kexec_event), false, NULL, 0);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -198,6 +208,7 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
static int ima_update_kexec_buffer(struct notifier_block *self,
unsigned long action, void *data)
{
+ char ima_kexec_event[IMA_KEXEC_EVENT_LEN];
void *buf = NULL;
size_t buf_size;
bool resume = false;
@@ -213,9 +224,31 @@ static int ima_update_kexec_buffer(struct
notifier_block *self,
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
+ buf_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size();
+ scnprintf(ima_kexec_event, IMA_KEXEC_EVENT_LEN,
+ "kexec_segment_size=%lu;ima_binary_runtime_size=%lu;",
+ kexec_segment_size, buf_size);
+
+ /*
+ * This is one of the very last events measured by IMA before kexec
+ * soft rebooting into the new Kernal.
+ * This event can be used as a marker after the system soft reboots
+ * to the new Kernel to check if there was sufficient memory allocated
+ * at kexec 'load' to capture the events measured between the window
+ * of kexec 'load' and 'execute'.
+ * This event needs to be present in the IMA log, in between the two
+ * 'boot_aggregate' events that are logged for the previous boot and
+ * the current soft reboot. If it is not present after the system soft
+ * reboots into the new Kernel, it would mean the IMA log is not
+ * consistent with the TPM PCR quotes, and the system needs to be
+ * cold-booted for the attestation to succeed again.
+ */
+ ima_measure_critical_data("ima_kexec", "kexec_execute",
+ ima_kexec_event, strlen(ima_kexec_event),
+ false, NULL, 0);
+
ima_measurements_suspend();
- buf_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size();
ret = ima_dump_measurement_list(&buf_size, &buf,
kexec_segment_size);
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-20 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-05 18:25 [PATCH v2 0/7] ima: kexec: measure events between kexec load and execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ima: refactor ima_dump_measurement_list to move memory allocation to a separate function Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:28 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:33 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-20 21:21 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 21:50 ` Tushar Sugandhi [this message]
2023-10-26 20:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-10-27 3:25 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-11-14 22:32 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-11-14 22:31 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ima: move ima_dump_measurement_list call from kexec load to execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:28 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:35 ` Tushar Sugandhi
[not found] ` <989af3e9a8621f57643b67b717d9a39fdb2ffe24.camel@linux.ibm.com>
2023-11-14 22:43 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-11-15 22:30 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] ima: kexec: map source pages containing IMA buffer to image post kexec load Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:29 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:36 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] kexec: update kexec_file_load syscall to call ima_kexec_post_load Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] ima: suspend measurements while the buffer is being copied during kexec reboot Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] ima: make the memory for events between kexec load and exec configurable Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:27 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:39 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-20 21:16 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 21:53 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ima: record log size at kexec load and execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:27 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:40 ` Tushar Sugandhi
[not found] ` <2b95e8b9ebe10a24c7cb6fc90cb2d1342a157ed5.camel@linux.ibm.com>
2023-11-14 22:48 ` Tushar Sugandhi
[not found] ` <8f87e7e4fe5c5a24cdc0d3e2267eeaf00825d1bb.camel@linux.ibm.com>
2023-10-27 19:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] ima: kexec: measure events between " Mimi Zohar
2023-11-15 19:21 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-11-14 23:24 ` Tushar Sugandhi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97927bf8-77d3-5117-7e49-41b76f308930@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bauermann@kolabnow.com \
--cc=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noodles@fb.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox