From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>,
zohar@linux.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, noodles@fb.com,
bauermann@kolabnow.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: code@tyhicks.com, nramas@linux.microsoft.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] ima: kexec: map source pages containing IMA buffer to image post kexec load
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:36:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e58b07b-29db-eddf-9263-41bcea4771db@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5098dd7c-70b5-f2ed-0fa6-0f0081f89df6@linux.ibm.com>
On 10/12/23 17:29, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
> On 10/5/23 14:25, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
>> Currently, the mechanism to map and unmap segments to the kimage
>> structure is not available to the subsystems outside of kexec. This
>> functionality is needed when IMA is allocating the memory segments
>> during kexec 'load' operation.
>>
>> Implement kimage_map_segment() which takes a kimage pointer, an address,
>> and a size. Ensure that the entire segment is being mapped by comparing
>> the given address and size to each segment in the kimage's segment array.
>> Collect the source pages that correspond to the given address range,
>> allocate an array of pointers to these pages, and map them to a
>> contiguous range of virtual addresses. If the mapping operation is
>> successful, the function returns the start of this range. Otherwise, it
>> frees the page pointer array and returns NULL.
>>
>> Implement kimage_unmap_segment() that takes a pointer to a segment buffer
>> and unmaps it using vunmap().
>>
>> Implement function ima_kexec_post_load(), to be called by IMA after kexec
>> loads the new Kernel image. ima_kexec_post_load() would map the IMA
>> buffer allocated during kexec 'load' to a segment in the loaded image.
>>
>> Finally, move for_each_kimage_entry() macro from kexec_core.c to kexec.h.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi<tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/ima.h | 3 ++
>> include/linux/kexec.h | 13 ++++++
>> kernel/kexec_core.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 32 +++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/ima.h b/include/linux/ima.h
>> index 86b57757c7b1..006db20f852d 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/ima.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/ima.h
>> @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ static inline void ima_appraise_parse_cmdline(void) {}
>> #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
>> extern void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image);
>> +extern void ima_kexec_post_load(struct kimage *image);
>> +#else
>> +static inline void ima_kexec_post_load(struct kimage *image) {}
>> #endif
>> #else
>> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
>> index 22b5cd24f581..e00b8101b53b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
>> @@ -490,6 +490,15 @@ static inline int
>> arch_kexec_post_alloc_pages(void *vaddr, unsigned int pages, g
>> static inline void arch_kexec_pre_free_pages(void *vaddr, unsigned
>> int pages) { }
>> #endif
>> +#define for_each_kimage_entry(image, ptr, entry) \
>> + for (ptr = &image->head; (entry = *ptr) && !(entry & IND_DONE); \
>> + ptr = (entry & IND_INDIRECTION) ? \
>> + boot_phys_to_virt((entry & PAGE_MASK)) : ptr + 1)
>> +
>> +extern void *kimage_map_segment(struct kimage *image,
>> + unsigned long addr, unsigned long size);
>> +extern void kimage_unmap_segment(void *buffer);
>> +
>> #else /* !CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */
>> struct pt_regs;
>> struct task_struct;
>> @@ -497,6 +506,10 @@ static inline void __crash_kexec(struct pt_regs
>> *regs) { }
>> static inline void crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
>> static inline int kexec_should_crash(struct task_struct *p) { return
>> 0; }
>> static inline int kexec_crash_loaded(void) { return 0; }
>> +static inline void *kimage_map_segment(struct kimage *image,
>> + unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
>> +{ return NULL; }
>> +static inline void kimage_unmap_segment(void *buffer) { }
>> #define kexec_in_progress false
>> #endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */
>> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c
>> index 3d578c6fefee..e01156f3c404 100644
>> --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
>> @@ -594,11 +594,6 @@ void kimage_terminate(struct kimage *image)
>> *image->entry = IND_DONE;
>> }
>> -#define for_each_kimage_entry(image, ptr, entry) \
>> - for (ptr = &image->head; (entry = *ptr) && !(entry & IND_DONE); \
>> - ptr = (entry & IND_INDIRECTION) ? \
>> - boot_phys_to_virt((entry & PAGE_MASK)) : ptr + 1)
>> -
>> static void kimage_free_entry(kimage_entry_t entry)
>> {
>> struct page *page;
>> @@ -921,6 +916,74 @@ int kimage_load_segment(struct kimage *image,
>> return result;
>> }
>> +void *kimage_map_segment(struct kimage *image,
>> + unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long eaddr = addr + size;
>> + unsigned long src_page_addr, dest_page_addr;
>> + struct page **src_pages;
>> + int i, npages;
>> + kimage_entry_t *ptr, entry;
>> + void *vaddr = NULL;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Make sure that we are mapping a whole segment.
>> + */
>> + for (i = 0; i < image->nr_segments; i++) {
>> + if (addr == image->segment[i].mem &&
>> + size == image->segment[i].memsz) {
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>
> I wonder whether this distrust in the segments or in the passed
> pointer&size are justifyable since you call this function like this:
>
> ima_kexec_buffer = kimage_map_segment(image,
> image->ima_buffer_addr,
> image->ima_buffer_size);
>
> and previously kexec_add_buffer() was also called:
>
> kbuf.buffer = kexec_buffer;
> kbuf.bufsz = kexec_buffer_size;
> kbuf.memsz = kexec_segment_size;
> ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("Error passing over kexec measurement buffer.\n");
> vfree(kexec_buffer);
> return;
> }
>
> image->ima_buffer_addr = kbuf.mem;
> image->ima_buffer_size = kexec_segment_size;
>
> So the one segment should be matching these addresses.
>
>
Yeh. This check is an overkill at this point.
I agree. I will remove this extra check.
>> +
>> + if (i == image->nr_segments) {
>> + pr_err("%s: No segment matching [%lx, %lx)\n", __func__,
>> + addr, eaddr);
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Collect the source pages and map them in a contiguous VA range.
>> + */
>> + npages = PFN_UP(eaddr) - PFN_DOWN(addr);
>> + src_pages = kmalloc(sizeof(*src_pages) * npages, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!src_pages) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Could not allocate ima pages array.\n", __func__);
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + i = 0;
>> + for_each_kimage_entry(image, ptr, entry) {
>> + if (entry & IND_DESTINATION)
>> + dest_page_addr = entry & PAGE_MASK;
>> + else if (entry & IND_SOURCE) {
>> + if (dest_page_addr >= addr && dest_page_addr < eaddr) {
>> + src_page_addr = entry & PAGE_MASK;
>> + src_pages[i++] =
>> + virt_to_page(__va(src_page_addr));
>> + if (i == npages)
>> + break;
>> + dest_page_addr += PAGE_SIZE;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Sanity check. */
>> + WARN_ON(i < npages);
>> +
>> + vaddr = vmap(src_pages, npages, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
> On either success or failure kfree(sec_pages); should go right here to
> not have a memory leak.
Will do.
~Tushar
>> + if (!vaddr) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Could not map imap buffer.\n", __func__);
>> + kfree(src_pages);
>> + }
>> + return vaddr;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void kimage_unmap_segment(void *segment_buffer)
>> +{
>> + vunmap(segment_buffer);
>> +}
>> +
>> struct kexec_load_limit {
>> /* Mutex protects the limit count. */
>> struct mutex mutex;
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> index 2c11bbe6efef..13fbbb90319b 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
>> #include <linux/kexec.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/ima.h>
>> +#include <linux/reboot.h>
>> +#include <asm/page.h>
>> #include "ima.h"
>> #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
>> @@ -19,6 +21,7 @@ struct seq_file ima_kexec_file;
>> struct ima_kexec_hdr ima_khdr;
>> static void *ima_kexec_buffer;
>> static size_t kexec_segment_size;
>> +static bool ima_kexec_update_registered;
>> void ima_clear_kexec_file(void)
>> {
>> @@ -221,6 +224,7 @@ static int ima_update_kexec_buffer(struct
>> notifier_block *self,
>> }
>> memcpy(ima_kexec_buffer, buf, buf_size);
>> out:
>> + kimage_unmap_segment(ima_kexec_buffer);
>> ima_kexec_buffer = NULL;
>> if (resume)
>> @@ -232,6 +236,34 @@ struct notifier_block update_buffer_nb = {
>> .notifier_call = ima_update_kexec_buffer,
>> };
>> +/*
>> + * Create a mapping for the source pages that contain the IMA buffer
>> + * so we can update it later.
>> + */
>> +void ima_kexec_post_load(struct kimage *image)
>> +{
>> + if (ima_kexec_buffer) {
>> + kimage_unmap_segment(ima_kexec_buffer);
>> + ima_kexec_buffer = NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!image->ima_buffer_addr)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + ima_kexec_buffer = kimage_map_segment(image,
>> + image->ima_buffer_addr,
>> + image->ima_buffer_size);
>> + if (!ima_kexec_buffer) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Could not map measurements buffer.\n", __func__);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!ima_kexec_update_registered) {
>> + register_reboot_notifier(&update_buffer_nb);
>> + ima_kexec_update_registered = true;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> #endif /* IMA_KEXEC */
>> /*
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-20 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-05 18:25 [PATCH v2 0/7] ima: kexec: measure events between kexec load and execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ima: refactor ima_dump_measurement_list to move memory allocation to a separate function Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:28 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:33 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-20 21:21 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 21:50 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-26 20:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-10-27 3:25 ` Mimi Zohar
2023-11-14 22:32 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-11-14 22:31 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ima: move ima_dump_measurement_list call from kexec load to execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:28 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:35 ` Tushar Sugandhi
[not found] ` <989af3e9a8621f57643b67b717d9a39fdb2ffe24.camel@linux.ibm.com>
2023-11-14 22:43 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-11-15 22:30 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] ima: kexec: map source pages containing IMA buffer to image post kexec load Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:29 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:36 ` Tushar Sugandhi [this message]
2023-10-05 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] kexec: update kexec_file_load syscall to call ima_kexec_post_load Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] ima: suspend measurements while the buffer is being copied during kexec reboot Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] ima: make the memory for events between kexec load and exec configurable Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:27 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:39 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-20 21:16 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 21:53 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-05 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ima: record log size at kexec load and execute Tushar Sugandhi
2023-10-13 0:27 ` Stefan Berger
2023-10-20 20:40 ` Tushar Sugandhi
[not found] ` <2b95e8b9ebe10a24c7cb6fc90cb2d1342a157ed5.camel@linux.ibm.com>
2023-11-14 22:48 ` Tushar Sugandhi
[not found] ` <8f87e7e4fe5c5a24cdc0d3e2267eeaf00825d1bb.camel@linux.ibm.com>
2023-10-27 19:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] ima: kexec: measure events between " Mimi Zohar
2023-11-15 19:21 ` Tushar Sugandhi
2023-11-14 23:24 ` Tushar Sugandhi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e58b07b-29db-eddf-9263-41bcea4771db@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bauermann@kolabnow.com \
--cc=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noodles@fb.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox