From: "Clément MATHIEU--DRIF" <clement.mathieu--drif@bull.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: intel_iommu unit test is also failing (was: Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests] realmode: load above stack)
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 06:37:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0abf41c113c9425ea4c73a108db22f28290fa395.camel@bull.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96f57df07e6d39e30557357142b2212e0ea26af4.camel@bull.com>
I will try to investigate today, it seems that the host does not wait for the dma operation to complete before reading back.
keep you posted
cmd
On Tue, 2026-05-05 at 07:49 +0200, Clement Mathieu--Drif wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Indeed, it seems to start failing when switching to gcc 16.1.
>
> gcc 15.2.1 - Qemu 11 => pass
> gcc 16.1 - Qemu 11 => fail
>
> On Mon, 2026-05-04 at 11:45 -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
>
> > Caution: External email. Do not open attachments or click links, unless this email comes from a known sender and you know the content is safe.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 10:07:25AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 04/05/2026 09.58, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 04/06/2024 16.35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > The bottom 32K of memory are generally reserved for use by the BIOS;
> > > > > for example, traditionally the boot loader is placed at 0x7C00 and
> > > > > the stack grows below that address.
> > > > >
> > > > > It turns out that with some versions of clang, realmode.flat has
> > > > > become big enough that it overlaps the stack used by the multiboot
> > > > > option ROM loader. The result is that a couple instructions are
> > > > > overwritten. Typically one or two tests fail and that's it...
> > > > >
> > > > > Move the code above the forbidden region, in real 90s style.
> > > > >
> > > > > Reported-by: Thomas Huth <[[thuth@redhat.com](mailto:thuth@redhat.com)](mailto:[thuth@redhat.com](mailto:thuth@redhat.com))>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[[pbonzini@redhat.com](mailto:pbonzini@redhat.com)](mailto:[pbonzini@redhat.com](mailto:pbonzini@redhat.com))>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > x86/realmode.lds | 2 +-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/x86/realmode.lds b/x86/realmode.lds
> > > > > index 0ed3063b..e4782a98 100644
> > > > > --- a/x86/realmode.lds
> > > > > +++ b/x86/realmode.lds
> > > > > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > > > > SECTIONS
> > > > > {
> > > > > - . = 16K;
> > > > > + . = 32K;
> > > > > stext = .;
> > > > > .text : { *(.init) *(.text) }
> > > > > . = ALIGN(4K);
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Paolo!
> > > >
> > > > FYI, the realmode kvm-unit-test now also fails with the recent version
> > > > of GCC 16 for the i386 target:
> > > >
> > > > [[https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/14195195727](https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/14195195727)](https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/14195195727](https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/14195195727))
> > > >
> > > > It was working fine some weeks ago with GCC 15.1:
> > > >
> > > > [[https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/13977260961](https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/13977260961)](https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/13977260961](https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/13977260961))
> > > >
> > > > When I apply your patch, the problem seems to be gone again in this
> > > > case, but since there were some other issues with this (with older
> > > > versions of GCC, I think):
> > > >
> > > > [[https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/49f8aadf-6e3f-4d2b-a32a-8ba941a3a2a1@redhat.com/](https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/49f8aadf-6e3f-4d2b-a32a-8ba941a3a2a1@redhat.com/)](https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/49f8aadf-6e3f-4d2b-a32a-8ba941a3a2a1@redhat.com/](https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/49f8aadf-6e3f-4d2b-a32a-8ba941a3a2a1@redhat.com/))
> > > >
> > > > ... there must be a better way to fix it?
> > > >
> > > > Could you please have a look?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > By the way, the intel_iommu test now also suddenly started failing (for the
> > > x86_64 target), either due to update of GCC or due to the update from QEMU
> > > v10.2 to 11.0 :
> > >
> > > [[https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/14195195728](https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/14195195728)](https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/14195195728](https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/14195195728))
> > >
> > > Two weeks ago, it was still working fine:
> > >
> > > [[https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/13977260962](https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/13977260962)](https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/13977260962](https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/13977260962))
> >
> >
> >
> > Looping in those who take care of qemu's VT-D now (Yi, Clément)..
> >
> > --
> > Peter Xu
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240604143507.1041901-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
2026-05-04 7:58 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests] realmode: load above stack Thomas Huth
2026-05-04 8:07 ` intel_iommu unit test is also failing (was: Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests] realmode: load above stack) Thomas Huth
2026-05-04 15:45 ` Peter Xu
2026-05-05 5:49 ` Clément MATHIEU--DRIF
2026-05-05 6:37 ` Clément MATHIEU--DRIF [this message]
2026-05-05 7:36 ` Clément MATHIEU--DRIF
2026-05-05 9:27 ` Clément MATHIEU--DRIF
2026-05-05 9:45 ` intel_iommu unit test is also failing Thomas Huth
2026-05-05 9:53 ` Clément MATHIEU--DRIF
2026-05-05 10:15 ` Thomas Huth
2026-05-05 10:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-05 10:34 ` Thomas Huth
2026-05-05 10:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-05 11:38 ` Thomas Huth
2026-05-05 12:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-05 17:08 ` Thomas Huth
2026-05-05 11:39 ` Clément MATHIEU--DRIF
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0abf41c113c9425ea4c73a108db22f28290fa395.camel@bull.com \
--to=clement.mathieu--drif@bull.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox