From: Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@intel.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
hpa@zytor.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
joro@8bytes.org, songliubraving@fb.com, peterz@infradead.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, kstewart@linuxfoundation.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, mattst88@gmail.com,
Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com, dwmw@amazon.co.uk,
jpoimboe@redhat.com, marcorr@google.com, ubizjak@gmail.com,
sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, jmattson@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v13 02/12] perf/x86/intel/pt: Export pt_cap_get()
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:05:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1540368316-12998-3-git-send-email-luwei.kang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1540368316-12998-1-git-send-email-luwei.kang@intel.com>
From: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
pt_cap_get() is required by the upcoming PT support in KVM guests.
Export it and move the capabilites enum to a global header.
As a global functions, "pt_*" is already used for ptrace and
other things, so it makes sense to use "intel_pt_*" as a prefix.
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
arch/x86/events/intel/pt.h | 21 ------------------
arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pt.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
index 8d016ce..309bb1d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
PT_CAP(psb_periods, 1, CPUID_EBX, 0xffff0000),
};
-static u32 pt_cap_get(enum pt_capabilities cap)
+u32 intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(enum pt_capabilities cap)
{
struct pt_cap_desc *cd = &pt_caps[cap];
u32 c = pt_pmu.caps[cd->leaf * PT_CPUID_REGS_NUM + cd->reg];
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ static u32 pt_cap_get(enum pt_capabilities cap)
return (c & cd->mask) >> shift;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_pt_validate_hw_cap);
static ssize_t pt_cap_show(struct device *cdev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
@@ -92,7 +93,7 @@ static ssize_t pt_cap_show(struct device *cdev,
container_of(attr, struct dev_ext_attribute, attr);
enum pt_capabilities cap = (long)ea->var;
- return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%x\n", pt_cap_get(cap));
+ return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%x\n", intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(cap));
}
static struct attribute_group pt_cap_group = {
@@ -310,16 +311,16 @@ static bool pt_event_valid(struct perf_event *event)
return false;
if (config & RTIT_CTL_CYC_PSB) {
- if (!pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_psb_cyc))
+ if (!intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_psb_cyc))
return false;
- allowed = pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_psb_periods);
+ allowed = intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_psb_periods);
requested = (config & RTIT_CTL_PSB_FREQ) >>
RTIT_CTL_PSB_FREQ_OFFSET;
if (requested && (!(allowed & BIT(requested))))
return false;
- allowed = pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_cycle_thresholds);
+ allowed = intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_cycle_thresholds);
requested = (config & RTIT_CTL_CYC_THRESH) >>
RTIT_CTL_CYC_THRESH_OFFSET;
if (requested && (!(allowed & BIT(requested))))
@@ -334,10 +335,10 @@ static bool pt_event_valid(struct perf_event *event)
* Spec says that setting mtc period bits while mtc bit in
* CPUID is 0 will #GP, so better safe than sorry.
*/
- if (!pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_mtc))
+ if (!intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_mtc))
return false;
- allowed = pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_mtc_periods);
+ allowed = intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_mtc_periods);
if (!allowed)
return false;
@@ -349,11 +350,11 @@ static bool pt_event_valid(struct perf_event *event)
}
if (config & RTIT_CTL_PWR_EVT_EN &&
- !pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_power_event_trace))
+ !intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_power_event_trace))
return false;
if (config & RTIT_CTL_PTW) {
- if (!pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_ptwrite))
+ if (!intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_ptwrite))
return false;
/* FUPonPTW without PTW doesn't make sense */
@@ -598,7 +599,7 @@ static struct topa *topa_alloc(int cpu, gfp_t gfp)
* In case of singe-entry ToPA, always put the self-referencing END
* link as the 2nd entry in the table
*/
- if (!pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries)) {
+ if (!intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries)) {
TOPA_ENTRY(topa, 1)->base = topa->phys >> TOPA_SHIFT;
TOPA_ENTRY(topa, 1)->end = 1;
}
@@ -638,7 +639,7 @@ static void topa_insert_table(struct pt_buffer *buf, struct topa *topa)
topa->offset = last->offset + last->size;
buf->last = topa;
- if (!pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries))
+ if (!intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries))
return;
BUG_ON(last->last != TENTS_PER_PAGE - 1);
@@ -654,7 +655,7 @@ static void topa_insert_table(struct pt_buffer *buf, struct topa *topa)
static bool topa_table_full(struct topa *topa)
{
/* single-entry ToPA is a special case */
- if (!pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries))
+ if (!intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries))
return !!topa->last;
return topa->last == TENTS_PER_PAGE - 1;
@@ -690,7 +691,8 @@ static int topa_insert_pages(struct pt_buffer *buf, gfp_t gfp)
TOPA_ENTRY(topa, -1)->base = page_to_phys(p) >> TOPA_SHIFT;
TOPA_ENTRY(topa, -1)->size = order;
- if (!buf->snapshot && !pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries)) {
+ if (!buf->snapshot &&
+ !intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries)) {
TOPA_ENTRY(topa, -1)->intr = 1;
TOPA_ENTRY(topa, -1)->stop = 1;
}
@@ -725,7 +727,7 @@ static void pt_topa_dump(struct pt_buffer *buf)
topa->table[i].intr ? 'I' : ' ',
topa->table[i].stop ? 'S' : ' ',
*(u64 *)&topa->table[i]);
- if ((pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries) &&
+ if ((intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries) &&
topa->table[i].stop) ||
topa->table[i].end)
break;
@@ -828,7 +830,7 @@ static void pt_handle_status(struct pt *pt)
* means we are already losing data; need to let the decoder
* know.
*/
- if (!pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries) ||
+ if (!intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries) ||
buf->output_off == sizes(TOPA_ENTRY(buf->cur, buf->cur_idx)->size)) {
perf_aux_output_flag(&pt->handle,
PERF_AUX_FLAG_TRUNCATED);
@@ -840,7 +842,8 @@ static void pt_handle_status(struct pt *pt)
* Also on single-entry ToPA implementations, interrupt will come
* before the output reaches its output region's boundary.
*/
- if (!pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries) && !buf->snapshot &&
+ if (!intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries) &&
+ !buf->snapshot &&
pt_buffer_region_size(buf) - buf->output_off <= TOPA_PMI_MARGIN) {
void *head = pt_buffer_region(buf);
@@ -931,7 +934,7 @@ static int pt_buffer_reset_markers(struct pt_buffer *buf,
/* single entry ToPA is handled by marking all regions STOP=1 INT=1 */
- if (!pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries))
+ if (!intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries))
return 0;
/* clear STOP and INT from current entry */
@@ -1082,7 +1085,7 @@ static int pt_buffer_init_topa(struct pt_buffer *buf, unsigned long nr_pages,
pt_buffer_setup_topa_index(buf);
/* link last table to the first one, unless we're double buffering */
- if (pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries)) {
+ if (intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries)) {
TOPA_ENTRY(buf->last, -1)->base = buf->first->phys >> TOPA_SHIFT;
TOPA_ENTRY(buf->last, -1)->end = 1;
}
@@ -1153,7 +1156,7 @@ static int pt_addr_filters_init(struct perf_event *event)
struct pt_filters *filters;
int node = event->cpu == -1 ? -1 : cpu_to_node(event->cpu);
- if (!pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges))
+ if (!intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges))
return 0;
filters = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct pt_filters), GFP_KERNEL, node);
@@ -1202,7 +1205,7 @@ static int pt_event_addr_filters_validate(struct list_head *filters)
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (++range > pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges))
+ if (++range > intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
@@ -1507,12 +1510,12 @@ static __init int pt_init(void)
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (!pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_topa_output)) {
+ if (!intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_topa_output)) {
pr_warn("ToPA output is not supported on this CPU\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
- if (!pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries))
+ if (!intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries))
pt_pmu.pmu.capabilities =
PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_NO_SG | PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_SW_DOUBLEBUF;
@@ -1530,7 +1533,7 @@ static __init int pt_init(void)
pt_pmu.pmu.addr_filters_sync = pt_event_addr_filters_sync;
pt_pmu.pmu.addr_filters_validate = pt_event_addr_filters_validate;
pt_pmu.pmu.nr_addr_filters =
- pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges);
+ intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges);
ret = perf_pmu_register(&pt_pmu.pmu, "intel_pt", -1);
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.h b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.h
index 0050ca1..269e15a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.h
@@ -45,30 +45,9 @@ struct topa_entry {
u64 rsvd4 : 16;
};
-#define PT_CPUID_LEAVES 2
-#define PT_CPUID_REGS_NUM 4 /* number of regsters (eax, ebx, ecx, edx) */
-
/* TSC to Core Crystal Clock Ratio */
#define CPUID_TSC_LEAF 0x15
-enum pt_capabilities {
- PT_CAP_max_subleaf = 0,
- PT_CAP_cr3_filtering,
- PT_CAP_psb_cyc,
- PT_CAP_ip_filtering,
- PT_CAP_mtc,
- PT_CAP_ptwrite,
- PT_CAP_power_event_trace,
- PT_CAP_topa_output,
- PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries,
- PT_CAP_single_range_output,
- PT_CAP_payloads_lip,
- PT_CAP_num_address_ranges,
- PT_CAP_mtc_periods,
- PT_CAP_cycle_thresholds,
- PT_CAP_psb_periods,
-};
-
struct pt_pmu {
struct pmu pmu;
u32 caps[PT_CPUID_REGS_NUM * PT_CPUID_LEAVES];
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pt.h
index b523f51..fa4b4fd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pt.h
@@ -2,10 +2,33 @@
#ifndef _ASM_X86_INTEL_PT_H
#define _ASM_X86_INTEL_PT_H
+#define PT_CPUID_LEAVES 2
+#define PT_CPUID_REGS_NUM 4 /* number of regsters (eax, ebx, ecx, edx) */
+
+enum pt_capabilities {
+ PT_CAP_max_subleaf = 0,
+ PT_CAP_cr3_filtering,
+ PT_CAP_psb_cyc,
+ PT_CAP_ip_filtering,
+ PT_CAP_mtc,
+ PT_CAP_ptwrite,
+ PT_CAP_power_event_trace,
+ PT_CAP_topa_output,
+ PT_CAP_topa_multiple_entries,
+ PT_CAP_single_range_output,
+ PT_CAP_payloads_lip,
+ PT_CAP_num_address_ranges,
+ PT_CAP_mtc_periods,
+ PT_CAP_cycle_thresholds,
+ PT_CAP_psb_periods,
+};
+
#if defined(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) && defined(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)
void cpu_emergency_stop_pt(void);
+extern u32 intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(enum pt_capabilities cap);
#else
static inline void cpu_emergency_stop_pt(void) {}
+static inline u32 intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(enum pt_capabilities cap) { return 0; }
#endif
#endif /* _ASM_X86_INTEL_PT_H */
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-24 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-24 8:05 [PATCH v13 00/12] Intel Processor Trace virtualization enabling Luwei Kang
2018-10-24 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 01/12] perf/x86/intel/pt: Move Intel PT MSRs bit defines to global header Luwei Kang
2018-10-24 8:05 ` Luwei Kang [this message]
2018-10-24 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 03/12] perf/x86/intel/pt: Introduce intel_pt_validate_cap() Luwei Kang
2018-10-24 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 04/12] perf/x86/intel/pt: Add new bit definitions for PT MSRs Luwei Kang
2018-10-24 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 05/12] perf/x86/intel/pt: add new capability for Intel PT Luwei Kang
2018-10-30 9:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-24 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 06/12] KVM: x86: Add Intel PT virtualization work mode Luwei Kang
2018-10-24 16:18 ` Jim Mattson
2018-10-25 0:35 ` Kang, Luwei
2018-10-30 9:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-30 9:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-30 10:13 ` Kang, Luwei
2018-10-30 10:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-31 0:36 ` Kang, Luwei
2018-10-24 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 07/12] KVM: x86: Add Intel Processor Trace cpuid emulation Luwei Kang
2018-10-24 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 08/12] KVM: x86: Add Intel PT context switch for each vcpu Luwei Kang
2018-10-24 10:13 ` Alexander Shishkin
2018-10-25 0:06 ` Kang, Luwei
2018-10-29 17:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-30 10:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-31 10:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-31 11:46 ` Alexander Shishkin
2018-10-30 11:26 ` Alexander Shishkin
2018-10-31 10:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-31 11:38 ` Alexander Shishkin
2018-10-31 12:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-31 14:21 ` Alexander Shishkin
2018-10-31 14:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-24 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 09/12] KVM: x86: Introduce a function to initialize the PT configuration Luwei Kang
2018-10-24 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 10/12] KVM: x86: Implement Intel PT MSRs read/write emulation Luwei Kang
2018-10-24 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 11/12] KVM: x86: Set intercept for Intel PT MSRs read/write Luwei Kang
2018-10-24 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 12/12] KVM: x86: Disable Intel PT when VMXON in L1 guest Luwei Kang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1540368316-12998-3-git-send-email-luwei.kang@intel.com \
--to=luwei.kang@intel.com \
--cc=Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcorr@google.com \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox