* Is kvm-kmod still supported?
@ 2015-12-28 22:09 Estrada, Zachary J
2015-12-28 23:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Estrada, Zachary J @ 2015-12-28 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm
I've been maintaining a fork for research and tinkering. Is the kvm-kmod
standalone module still supported or should I be using the full Linux tree? I
find kvm-kmod convenient to keep the source independent of the kernel tree, but
I also want to be using the latest and greatest.
The repository I'm referring to is here:
http://git.kiszka.org/?p=kvm-kmod.git;a=summary
However, the "next" branch appears to be out of sync with the latest upstream in
the Linux tree.
Thanks so much!
--Zak
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is kvm-kmod still supported?
2015-12-28 22:09 Is kvm-kmod still supported? Estrada, Zachary J
@ 2015-12-28 23:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-12-28 23:47 ` Zachary J Estrada
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2015-12-28 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Estrada, Zachary J, kvm
On 28/12/2015 23:09, Estrada, Zachary J wrote:
> I've been maintaining a fork for research and tinkering. Is the kvm-kmod
> standalone module still supported or should I be using the full Linux
> tree? I find kvm-kmod convenient to keep the source independent of the
> kernel tree, but I also want to be using the latest and greatest.
>
> The repository I'm referring to is here:
> http://git.kiszka.org/?p=kvm-kmod.git;a=summary
>
> However, the "next" branch appears to be out of sync with the latest
> upstream in the Linux tree.
I'm using it occasionally and I have patches that bring it up to date,
but only with recent base kernel versions (3.10+ *should* work).
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is kvm-kmod still supported?
2015-12-28 23:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2015-12-28 23:47 ` Zachary J Estrada
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zachary J Estrada @ 2015-12-28 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: kvm
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:16:13AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 28/12/2015 23:09, Estrada, Zachary J wrote:
> > I've been maintaining a fork for research and tinkering. Is the kvm-kmod
> > standalone module still supported or should I be using the full Linux
> > tree? I find kvm-kmod convenient to keep the source independent of the
> > kernel tree, but I also want to be using the latest and greatest.
> >
> > The repository I'm referring to is here:
> > http://git.kiszka.org/?p=kvm-kmod.git;a=summary
> >
> > However, the "next" branch appears to be out of sync with the latest
> > upstream in the Linux tree.
>
> I'm using it occasionally and I have patches that bring it up to date,
> but only with recent base kernel versions (3.10+ *should* work).
>
> Paolo
Got it, found this on github:
https://github.com/bonzini/kvm-kmod.git
Thanks so much!
--Zak
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-28 23:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-28 22:09 Is kvm-kmod still supported? Estrada, Zachary J
2015-12-28 23:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-12-28 23:47 ` Zachary J Estrada
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox