From: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com, seanjc@google.com,
like.xu.linux@gmail.com, vkuznets@redhat.com,
wei.w.wang@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 05/17] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:25:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220215212544.51666-6-weijiang.yang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220215212544.51666-1-weijiang.yang@intel.com>
From: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
The x86_pmu.lbr_info is 0 unless explicitly initialized, so there's
no point checking x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 669c2be14784..4ab358ca7290 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -1874,12 +1874,10 @@ void __init intel_pmu_arch_lbr_init(void)
*/
int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
{
- int lbr_fmt = x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format;
-
lbr->nr = x86_pmu.lbr_nr;
lbr->from = x86_pmu.lbr_from;
lbr->to = x86_pmu.lbr_to;
- lbr->info = (lbr_fmt == LBR_FORMAT_INFO) ? x86_pmu.lbr_info : 0;
+ lbr->info = x86_pmu.lbr_info;
return 0;
}
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-16 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-15 21:25 [PATCH v9 00/17] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 01/17] KVM: x86: Report XSS as an MSR to be saved if there are supported features Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 02/17] KVM: x86: Refresh CPUID on writes to MSR_IA32_XSS Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 03/17] KVM: x86: Load guest fpu state when accessing MSRs managed by XSAVES Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 04/17] perf/x86/intel: Fix the comment about guest LBR support on KVM Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` Yang Weijiang [this message]
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 06/17] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR MSRs to msrs_to_save_all list Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 07/17] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH for guest Arch LBR Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 08/17] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL " Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 09/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Refactor code to support " Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 10/17] KVM: x86: Refine the matching and clearing logic for supported_xss Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 11/17] KVM: x86: Add XSAVE Support for Architectural LBR Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 12/17] KVM: x86/vmx: Check Arch LBR config when return perf capabilities Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 13/17] KVM: nVMX: Add necessary Arch LBR settings for nested VM Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 14/17] KVM: x86/vmx: Clear Arch LBREn bit before inject #DB to guest Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 15/17] KVM: x86/vmx: Flip Arch LBREn bit on guest state change Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 16/17] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR MSR access interface Yang Weijiang
2022-02-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v9 17/17] KVM: x86/cpuid: Advertise Arch LBR feature in CPUID Yang Weijiang
2022-02-21 6:11 ` [PATCH v9 00/17] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang, Weijiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220215212544.51666-6-weijiang.yang@intel.com \
--to=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox