From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] x86/msr: Treat PRED_CMD as support if CPU has SBPB
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 12:26:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250605192643.533502-2-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250605192643.533502-1-seanjc@google.com>
The PRED_CMD MSR also exists if the CPU supports SBPB.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
lib/x86/processor.h | 1 +
x86/msr.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/x86/processor.h b/lib/x86/processor.h
index b656ebf6..9e3659d4 100644
--- a/lib/x86/processor.h
+++ b/lib/x86/processor.h
@@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ struct x86_cpu_feature {
#define X86_FEATURE_SME_COHERENT X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000001F, 0, EAX, 10)
#define X86_FEATURE_DEBUG_SWAP X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000001F, 0, EAX, 14)
#define X86_FEATURE_SVSM X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000001F, 0, EAX, 28)
+#define X86_FEATURE_SBPB X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000021, 0, EAX, 27)
#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_V2 X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000022, 0, EAX, 0)
/*
diff --git a/x86/msr.c b/x86/msr.c
index f582a584..ac12d127 100644
--- a/x86/msr.c
+++ b/x86/msr.c
@@ -296,7 +296,8 @@ static void test_cmd_msrs(void)
test_rdmsr_fault(MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD, "PRED_CMD");
if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) ||
- this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB)) {
+ this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB) ||
+ this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SBPB)) {
test_wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD, "PRED_CMD", 0);
test_wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD, "PRED_CMD", PRED_CMD_IBPB);
} else {
--
2.50.0.rc0.604.gd4ff7b7c86-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-05 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-05 19:26 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] x86/msr: Add a testcase to verify SPEC_CTRL exists (or not) as expected Sean Christopherson
2025-06-06 12:44 ` Chao Gao
2025-06-06 22:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/3] x86/msr: Add an "msr64" test configuration to validate negative cases Sean Christopherson
2025-06-25 22:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250605192643.533502-2-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox