From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] x86/msr: Add a testcase to verify SPEC_CTRL exists (or not) as expected
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 20:44:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aELixaeTRl+BcfcH@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250605192643.533502-3-seanjc@google.com>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 12:26:42PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>Verify that SPEC_CTRL can be read when it should exist, #GPs on all reads
>and writes does not exist, and that various bits can be set when they're
>supported.
>
>Opportunistically define more AMD mitigation features.
>
>Cc: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>---
> lib/x86/msr.h | 8 ++++++--
> lib/x86/processor.h | 9 +++++++--
> x86/msr.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/lib/x86/msr.h b/lib/x86/msr.h
>index ccfd6bdd..cc4cb855 100644
>--- a/lib/x86/msr.h
>+++ b/lib/x86/msr.h
>@@ -32,8 +32,12 @@
> #define EFER_FFXSR (1<<_EFER_FFXSR)
>
> /* Intel MSRs. Some also available on other CPUs */
>-#define MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL 0x00000048
>-#define MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD 0x00000049
>+#define MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL 0x00000048
>+#define SPEC_CTRL_IBRS BIT(0)
>+#define SPEC_CTRL_STIBP BIT(1)
>+#define SPEC_CTRL_SSBD BIT(2)
>+
>+#define MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD 0x00000049
> #define PRED_CMD_IBPB BIT(0)
>
> #define MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD 0x0000010b
>diff --git a/lib/x86/processor.h b/lib/x86/processor.h
>index 9e3659d4..cbfaa018 100644
>--- a/lib/x86/processor.h
>+++ b/lib/x86/processor.h
>@@ -288,13 +288,13 @@ struct x86_cpu_feature {
> #define X86_FEATURE_LA57 X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 16)
> #define X86_FEATURE_RDPID X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 22)
> #define X86_FEATURE_SHSTK X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 7)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_PKS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 31)
> #define X86_FEATURE_IBT X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 20)
> #define X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 26)
> #define X86_FEATURE_FLUSH_L1D X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 28)
> #define X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPABILITIES X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 29)
>-#define X86_FEATURE_PKS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 31)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_SSBD X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 31)
nit: looks adding a tab after "#define" is the convention in this file
> #define X86_FEATURE_LAM X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 1, EAX, 26)
>-
> /*
> * KVM defined leafs
> */
>@@ -312,6 +312,11 @@ struct x86_cpu_feature {
> #define X86_FEATURE_LM X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000001, 0, EDX, 29)
> #define X86_FEATURE_RDPRU X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 4)
> #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 12)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 14)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 15)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP_ALWAYS_ON X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 17)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS_SAME_MODE X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 19)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 24)
ditto
> #define X86_FEATURE_NPT X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 0)
> #define X86_FEATURE_LBRV X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 1)
> #define X86_FEATURE_NRIPS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 3)
>diff --git a/x86/msr.c b/x86/msr.c
>index ac12d127..ca265fac 100644
>--- a/x86/msr.c
>+++ b/x86/msr.c
>@@ -290,10 +290,37 @@ static void test_x2apic_msrs(void)
> __test_x2apic_msrs(true);
> }
>
>-static void test_cmd_msrs(void)
>+static void test_mitigation_msrs(void)
> {
>+ u64 spec_ctrl_bits = 0, val;
> int i;
>
>+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) || this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS))
>+ spec_ctrl_bits |= SPEC_CTRL_IBRS;
>+
>+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) || this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP))
>+ spec_ctrl_bits |= SPEC_CTRL_STIBP;
CPUID.(EAX=07H, ECX=0):EDX[26] enumerates IBRS and IBPB support, but it doesn't
enumerate STIBP support. EDX[27] does.
Aside from this, the patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
>+
>+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SSBD) || this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD))
>+ spec_ctrl_bits |= SPEC_CTRL_SSBD;
>+
>+ if (spec_ctrl_bits) {
>+ for (val = 0; val <= spec_ctrl_bits; val++) {
>+ /*
>+ * Test only values that are guaranteed not to fault,
>+ * virtualization of SPEC_CTRL has myriad holes that
>+ * won't be ever closed.
>+ */
>+ if ((val & spec_ctrl_bits) != val)
>+ continue;
>+
>+ test_msr_rw(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, "SPEC_CTRL", val);
>+ }
>+ } else {
>+ test_rdmsr_fault(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, "SPEC_CTRL");
>+ test_wrmsr_fault(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, "SPEC_CTRL", 0);
>+ }
>+
> test_rdmsr_fault(MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD, "PRED_CMD");
> if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) ||
> this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB) ||
>@@ -332,7 +359,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
> test_misc_msrs();
> test_mce_msrs();
> test_x2apic_msrs();
>- test_cmd_msrs();
>+ test_mitigation_msrs();
> }
>
> return report_summary();
>--
>2.50.0.rc0.604.gd4ff7b7c86-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-06 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-05 19:26 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] x86/msr: Treat PRED_CMD as support if CPU has SBPB Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] x86/msr: Add a testcase to verify SPEC_CTRL exists (or not) as expected Sean Christopherson
2025-06-06 12:44 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2025-06-06 22:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/3] x86/msr: Add an "msr64" test configuration to validate negative cases Sean Christopherson
2025-06-25 22:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aELixaeTRl+BcfcH@intel.com \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox