From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/28] KVM: arm64: Add NVHCR_EL2 context switching
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 16:43:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260702164310.03AAC1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702160248.1377250-24-maz@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Cross-VM Information Leak via unswitched SYS_NVHCR_EL2 physical register
--
commit ce2ffdc8cef6935283480a976d01a70bb788a885
Author: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
KVM: arm64: Add NVHCR_EL2 context switching
This commit adds context switching for the NVHCR_EL2 register to manage
the HCR_EL2 state of an EL1 guest. The switch is conditional on the guest
using NV3.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/sysreg-sr.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/sysreg-sr.h
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/sysreg-sr.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/sysreg-sr.h
> @@ -172,6 +172,10 @@ static inline void __sysreg_save_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>
> if (ctxt_has_sctlr2(ctxt))
> ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, SCTLR2_EL1) = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SCTLR2);
> +
> + /* Retrieve L2's HCR_EL2, and save it for future use */
> + if (is_nested_nv3_ctxt(ctxt_to_vcpu(ctxt)))
> + ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, NVHCR_EL2) = read_sysreg_s(SYS_NVHCR_EL2);
[Severity: High]
Could this leak information between VMs when the host hardware supports NV3
but the guest doesn't have it enabled?
If the host hardware implements FEAT_NV3 and runs an L2 guest with physical
HCR_EL2.NV=1, the hardware will redirect EL1 accesses of HCR_EL2 to the
physical SYS_NVHCR_EL2 register.
Since is_nested_nv3_ctxt() evaluates to false when the guest lacks the
virtual NV3 capability, __sysreg_save_el1_state() skips saving this register.
Does this allow an untrusted L2 guest to read the SYS_NVHCR_EL2 state left
behind by a previously running VM, bypassing software isolation?
> }
>
[ ... ]
> @@ -285,6 +289,13 @@ static inline void __sysreg_restore_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt,
>
> if (ctxt_has_sctlr2(ctxt))
> write_sysreg_el1(ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, SCTLR2_EL1), SYS_SCTLR2);
> +
> + /*
> + * Publish the L2 view of HCR_EL2 to the HW if L1 is using NV3.
> + * Otherwise, the data is already in place in the L1's own VNCR.
> + */
> + if (is_nested_nv3_ctxt(ctxt_to_vcpu(ctxt)))
> + write_sysreg_s(ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, NVHCR_EL2), SYS_NVHCR_EL2);
[Severity: High]
Similar to the save path above in __sysreg_save_el1_state(), should this
context switch be based on the host's hardware capability rather than the
guest's software configuration?
If the physical register isn't explicitly overwritten in
__sysreg_restore_el1_state() because is_nested_nv3_ctxt() is false, the
L2 guest could potentially read the stale configuration state of a
completely different VM.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260702160248.1377250-1-maz@kernel.org?part=23
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 16:02 [PATCH 00/28] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_NV2p1 and FEAT_NV3 Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 01/28] arm64: sysreg: Emit RESx/UNKN values for Mapping definitions Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 17:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 02/28] arm64: Update ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 description to 2026-03 JSON release Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 03/28] KVM: arm64: Merge guest's HCRX_EL2 using NV_HCRX_GUEST_EXCLUDE Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 18:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 04/28] KVM: arm64: Drop __HCRX_EL2_* masks Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 18:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 21:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 05/28] KVM: arm64: Plumb HCRX_EL2.SRMASKEn in HCRX_EL2 sanitisation Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 18:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 06/28] KVM: arm64: Classify CPTR_EL2 as a SR_LOC_SPECIAL register Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 07/28] KVM: arm64: Don't evaluate HCR_EL2.NV on ERET fast path Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 17:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 08/28] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_NV2P1 capability Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 09/28] KVM: arm64: Relax CPTR_EL2 handling when FEAT_NV2p1 is present Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 10/28] KVM: arm64: Relax CNTHCTL_EL2 " Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 17:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 11/28] KVM: arm64: Expose FEAT_NV2p1 to NV guests Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 18:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 12/28] arm64: Add FEAT_NV2p1 detection Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 13/28] arm64: sysreg: Add NVHCR_EL2 description as a mirror of HCR_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 14/28] arm64: sysreg: Add HCRX_EL2 bits related to FEAT_NV3 Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 15/28] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_NV3 capability Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 16/28] KVM: arm64: Split NV-specific exit fixups from the non-NV handling Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 17/28] KVM: arm64: Add NV3 control bits to HCRX_EL2 sanitisation Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 18/28] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_has_nv{2,3}() predicates Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 18:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 19/28] KVM: arm64: Make HCR_EL2 a non-VNCR register Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 20/28] KVM: arm64: Add sanitisation for NVHCR_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 21/28] KVM: arm64: Add NVHCR_EL2 handling to the sysreg array Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 22/28] KVM: arm64: Add routing for NVHCR_EL2 trap Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 18:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 23/28] KVM: arm64: Add NVHCR_EL2 context switching Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-02 20:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 24/28] KVM: arm64: Engage NV3 ERET trap elision Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 25/28] KVM: arm64: Engage NV3 TLBI " Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 21:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 26/28] KVM: arm64: Add FEAT_NV3 detection Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 20:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 27/28] KVM: arm64: Expose FEAT_NV3 to guests Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 20:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 28/28] arm64: Add override for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.NV_frac Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260702164310.03AAC1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox