From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Subject: [GIT PULL v1 07/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Cancel existing workqueues
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 18:09:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803160924.236807-8-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803160924.236807-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
The initialization of the io_work and crw_work workqueues begs the
question of whether they should be un-initialized. Add the corresponding
cleanup tags in _release_dev to ensure work isn't dispatched after
the private struct is free'd.
Suggested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: e5f84dbaea59 ("vfio: ccw: return I/O results asynchronously")
Fixes: 3f02cb2fd9d2 ("vfio-ccw: Wire up the CRW irq and CRW region")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
index 032a1cdf4df7..d361d1fde3a0 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
@@ -131,6 +131,13 @@ static void vfio_ccw_mdev_release_dev(struct vfio_device *vdev)
container_of(vdev, struct vfio_ccw_private, vdev);
struct vfio_ccw_crw *crw, *temp;
+ /*
+ * Ensure these work items are fully drained, so none can
+ * fire after being released.
+ */
+ cancel_work_sync(&private->io_work);
+ cancel_work_sync(&private->crw_work);
+
list_for_each_entry_safe(crw, temp, &private->crw, next) {
list_del(&crw->next);
kfree(crw);
@@ -202,6 +209,14 @@ static void vfio_ccw_mdev_close_device(struct vfio_device *vdev)
container_of(vdev, struct vfio_ccw_private, vdev);
vfio_ccw_fsm_event(private, VFIO_CCW_EVENT_CLOSE);
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure these work items are drained, in the event the
+ * device is re-opened instead of released.
+ */
+ cancel_work_sync(&private->io_work);
+ cancel_work_sync(&private->crw_work);
+
vfio_ccw_unregister_dev_regions(private);
}
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 16:09 [GIT PULL v1 00/23] KVM: s390: Misc KVM and vfio-ccw fixes Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 01/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Free all memory if cp_init() fails Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 02/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Limit the number of channel program segments Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 03/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Fix out of bounds check on CCW array Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 04/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Ensure first IDAW remains constant Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 05/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Calculate idal length based on idaw type Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 06/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Ensure index for read/write regions are within range Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2026-08-03 16:41 ` [GIT PULL v1 07/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Cancel existing workqueues sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 08/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Move cp cleanup out of not operational Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 09/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Selectively expand io_mutex Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 10/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Implement a crw lock Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 11/23] KVM: s390: Fix unlikely NULL gmap dereference Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 12/23] KVM: s390: Do not free SCA if it was not allocated Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 13/23] KVM: s390: Fix kvm_s390_vcpu_unsetup_cmma() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 14/23] KVM: s390: Fix overclearing ESCA in case of error Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 15/23] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Fix sca_clear_ext_call() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 16/23] KVM: s390: Fix leaking of PGM_ADDRESSING to userspace Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 17/23] KVM: s390: Fix race in __do_essa() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 18/23] KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 19/23] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Add missing locking around gmap_remove_child() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 20/23] KVM: s390: Free the mmu cache when kvm_arch_vcpu_create() fails Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 21/23] KVM: s390: Return -EINTR if a signal is pending while faulting-in Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 22/23] KVM: s390: Fix ordering when adding to SCA Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 23/23] KVM: s390: Fix cleanup in kvm_s390_pv_create_cpu() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 13:48 ` [GIT PULL v1 00/23] KVM: s390: Misc KVM and vfio-ccw fixes Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260803160924.236807-8-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox