Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v1 01/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Free all memory if cp_init() fails
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:28:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803162827.719B81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803160924.236807-2-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] A malicious guest can trigger unbounded kernel stack recursion and host panic by providing a long chain of non-looping Transfer in Channel (TIC) CCWs.
--

--- Patch [1]: [GIT PULL v1 01/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Free all memory if cp_init() fails ---
commit 2ed68383152f2b2060167f3fc63cdb973d979950
Author: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>

s390/vfio_ccw: Free all memory if cp_init() fails

This commit moves the ccwchain cleanup out of the recursive
ccwchain_handle_ccw() and ccwchain_loop_tic() logic into a new wrapper
function ccwchain_build_ccws(). This ensures that all segments allocated for
a channel program are freed if initialization fails.

> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> index 7561aa7d3e017..086d1b54bdb05 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -455,9 +455,6 @@ static int ccwchain_handle_ccw(dma32_t cda, struct channel_program *cp)
>  	/* Loop for tics on this new chain. */
>  	ret = ccwchain_loop_tic(chain, cp);
>  

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this recursive call chain lead to
unbounded kernel stack consumption?

Looking at ccwchain_handle_ccw() and ccwchain_loop_tic(), they recursively
call each other:

ccwchain_handle_ccw()
   ccwchain_loop_tic()
      ccwchain_handle_ccw()

If a guest constructs a channel program with a long sequence of Transfer
in Channel (TIC) CCWs, where each points to a distinct guest physical
address, tic_target_chain_exists() will return false.

Does this allow an unprivileged guest to trigger unbounded recursion and
overflow the host kernel stack, resulting in a host panic?

> -	if (ret)
> -		ccwchain_free(chain);
> -
>  	return ret;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260803160924.236807-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-03 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-03 16:09 [GIT PULL v1 00/23] KVM: s390: Misc KVM and vfio-ccw fixes Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 01/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Free all memory if cp_init() fails Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:28   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 02/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Limit the number of channel program segments Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 03/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Fix out of bounds check on CCW array Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 04/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Ensure first IDAW remains constant Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 05/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Calculate idal length based on idaw type Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 06/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Ensure index for read/write regions are within range Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 07/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Cancel existing workqueues Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 08/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Move cp cleanup out of not operational Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 09/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Selectively expand io_mutex Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 10/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Implement a crw lock Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 11/23] KVM: s390: Fix unlikely NULL gmap dereference Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 12/23] KVM: s390: Do not free SCA if it was not allocated Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 13/23] KVM: s390: Fix kvm_s390_vcpu_unsetup_cmma() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 14/23] KVM: s390: Fix overclearing ESCA in case of error Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 15/23] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Fix sca_clear_ext_call() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 16/23] KVM: s390: Fix leaking of PGM_ADDRESSING to userspace Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 17/23] KVM: s390: Fix race in __do_essa() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 18/23] KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 19/23] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Add missing locking around gmap_remove_child() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 20/23] KVM: s390: Free the mmu cache when kvm_arch_vcpu_create() fails Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 21/23] KVM: s390: Return -EINTR if a signal is pending while faulting-in Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 22/23] KVM: s390: Fix ordering when adding to SCA Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 23/23] KVM: s390: Fix cleanup in kvm_s390_pv_create_cpu() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 13:48 ` [GIT PULL v1 00/23] KVM: s390: Misc KVM and vfio-ccw fixes Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260803162827.719B81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox