Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Leon Romanovsky" <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	media-ci@linuxtv.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 16/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Let a client declare that it selects ATS per mapping
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 12:08:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001120807.8723F1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001-fix-p2p-acs-v4-0-v9-16-1a8e0f50ddd9@nvidia.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] pci/p2pdma: pure clients cannot set ats_per_mapping because pdev->p2pdma is NULL
--

commit f332086fc4a4273d099c81fafb33298021d47d1a
Author: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>

PCI/P2PDMA: Let a client declare that it selects ATS per mapping

The PCIe ATS Enable bit covers the whole device, so P2PDMA cannot tell
from it whether a client will translate a given address. Most devices
translate any address once ATS is enabled, but some choose ATS per DMA
mapping and can still use bus addresses for the rest.

Add pcim_p2pdma_set_ats_per_mapping() so the driver of such a device can
declare that before P2PDMA starts treating clients with ATS enabled as
translating everything.

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> index cf190bd572d4a..6a63901c65fb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -1562,6 +1563,32 @@ void pci_p2pmem_publish(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool publish)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_p2pmem_publish);
>  
> +/**
> + * pcim_p2pdma_set_ats_per_mapping - Declare per-mapping ATS for a client
> + * @pdev: PCI device that initiates peer-to-peer DMA
> + *
> + * Declare that @pdev issues Translated Requests only for the DMA mappings its
> + * driver sets up to use ATS, rather than for any address once ATS is enabled.
> + * P2PDMA then routes this client's Requests with the Address Type each query
> + * asks about, rather than the one its ATS Enable bit implies.
> + */
> +void pcim_p2pdma_set_ats_per_mapping(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct pci_p2pdma *p2p;
> +
> +	p2p = rcu_dereference_protected(pdev->p2pdma, 1);
> +	if (!p2p)
> +		/*
> +		 * ats_per_mapping is a performance optimization,
> +		 * if pcim_p2pdma_init() didn't set pdev->p2pdma pointer
> +		 * for some reason, let's simply use ATS global settings.
> +		 */
> +		return;

[Severity: Medium]
Will this silently fail for pure P2PDMA clients?

It looks like pdev->p2pdma is only allocated when a device registers as a
P2P memory provider via pcim_p2pdma_init():

drivers/pci/p2pdma.c:pcim_p2pdma_init() {
	...
	p2p = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*p2p), GFP_KERNEL);
	...
}

If a driver for a pure P2PDMA client (e.g., an NVMe initiator without CMB)
calls pcim_p2pdma_set_ats_per_mapping() to declare its ATS behavior, won't
pdev->p2pdma be NULL since it never called pcim_p2pdma_init()?

If so, wouldn't this cause the client to silently fall back to suboptimal
global ATS routing, as it can never successfully set the ats_per_mapping flag?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001-fix-p2p-acs-v4-0-v9-0-1a8e0f50ddd9@nvidia.com?part=16

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-01 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-01 11:55 [PATCH v9 00/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route peer-to-peer DMA by TLP class Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 01/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document the TLP attribute assumptions Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 20:12   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 02/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Derive routing from directional ACS controls Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 20:49   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07  6:32     ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-07 20:40       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 03/18] PCI: Reject unreadable ACS controls in isolation checks Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 04/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate ACS controls at the path divergence Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 21:08   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07 10:51     ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 05/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document directional ACS routing Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 15:25     ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 21:32   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07 13:46     ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-07 20:10       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 06/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Collect the path's ACS controls before deciding Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 21:48   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07 13:50     ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 07/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Answer routing per TLP class Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 08/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Relaxed Ordering Completions directly Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 22:21   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 09/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Reject Translated Requests blocked by Translation Blocking Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 10/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Translated Requests under Direct Translated P2P Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 22:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 11/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Log detailed ACS routing diagnostics Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 12/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Add KUnit tests for the ACS routing decisions Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 13/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Test the ACS P2P routing walk Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 14/18] PCI: Add KUnit coverage for ACS isolation checks Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 15/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document TLP-class routing Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 16/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Let a client declare that it selects ATS per mapping Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:08   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-01 12:59     ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 17/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate the ATS path for clients with ATS enabled Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 15:23     ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 18/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Test the routing of " Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 19:29 ` [PATCH v9 00/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route peer-to-peer DMA by TLP class Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-06 21:22   ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 21:36     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07  6:56       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07 10:54         ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-07 11:31           ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261001120807.8723F1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox