From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
media-ci@linuxtv.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 16/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Let a client declare that it selects ATS per mapping
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 15:59:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001125944.GM3401365@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001120807.8723F1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 12:08:07PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] pci/p2pdma: pure clients cannot set ats_per_mapping because pdev->p2pdma is NULL
> --
>
> commit f332086fc4a4273d099c81fafb33298021d47d1a
> Author: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
>
> PCI/P2PDMA: Let a client declare that it selects ATS per mapping
>
> The PCIe ATS Enable bit covers the whole device, so P2PDMA cannot tell
> from it whether a client will translate a given address. Most devices
> translate any address once ATS is enabled, but some choose ATS per DMA
> mapping and can still use bus addresses for the rest.
>
> Add pcim_p2pdma_set_ats_per_mapping() so the driver of such a device can
> declare that before P2PDMA starts treating clients with ATS enabled as
> translating everything.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> > index cf190bd572d4a..6a63901c65fb6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -1562,6 +1563,32 @@ void pci_p2pmem_publish(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool publish)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_p2pmem_publish);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * pcim_p2pdma_set_ats_per_mapping - Declare per-mapping ATS for a client
> > + * @pdev: PCI device that initiates peer-to-peer DMA
> > + *
> > + * Declare that @pdev issues Translated Requests only for the DMA mappings its
> > + * driver sets up to use ATS, rather than for any address once ATS is enabled.
> > + * P2PDMA then routes this client's Requests with the Address Type each query
> > + * asks about, rather than the one its ATS Enable bit implies.
> > + */
> > +void pcim_p2pdma_set_ats_per_mapping(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_p2pdma *p2p;
> > +
> > + p2p = rcu_dereference_protected(pdev->p2pdma, 1);
> > + if (!p2p)
> > + /*
> > + * ats_per_mapping is a performance optimization,
> > + * if pcim_p2pdma_init() didn't set pdev->p2pdma pointer
> > + * for some reason, let's simply use ATS global settings.
> > + */
> > + return;
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Will this silently fail for pure P2PDMA clients?
>
> It looks like pdev->p2pdma is only allocated when a device registers as a
> P2P memory provider via pcim_p2pdma_init():
Yes, this is exactly for them and no one else.
Thanks
>
> drivers/pci/p2pdma.c:pcim_p2pdma_init() {
> ...
> p2p = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*p2p), GFP_KERNEL);
> ...
> }
>
> If a driver for a pure P2PDMA client (e.g., an NVMe initiator without CMB)
> calls pcim_p2pdma_set_ats_per_mapping() to declare its ATS behavior, won't
> pdev->p2pdma be NULL since it never called pcim_p2pdma_init()?
Only RDMA NICs support that per-mapping thing.
Thanks
>
> If so, wouldn't this cause the client to silently fall back to suboptimal
> global ATS routing, as it can never successfully set the ats_per_mapping flag?
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001-fix-p2p-acs-v4-0-v9-0-1a8e0f50ddd9@nvidia.com?part=16
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 11:55 [PATCH v9 00/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route peer-to-peer DMA by TLP class Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 01/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document the TLP attribute assumptions Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 20:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 02/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Derive routing from directional ACS controls Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 20:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07 6:32 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-07 20:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 03/18] PCI: Reject unreadable ACS controls in isolation checks Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 04/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate ACS controls at the path divergence Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 21:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07 10:51 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 05/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document directional ACS routing Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 15:25 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 21:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07 13:46 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-07 20:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 06/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Collect the path's ACS controls before deciding Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 21:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07 13:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 07/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Answer routing per TLP class Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 08/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Relaxed Ordering Completions directly Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 22:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 09/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Reject Translated Requests blocked by Translation Blocking Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 10/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Translated Requests under Direct Translated P2P Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 22:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 11/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Log detailed ACS routing diagnostics Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 12/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Add KUnit tests for the ACS routing decisions Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 13/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Test the ACS P2P routing walk Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 14/18] PCI: Add KUnit coverage for ACS isolation checks Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 15/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Document TLP-class routing Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 16/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Let a client declare that it selects ATS per mapping Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 12:59 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 17/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate the ATS path for clients with ATS enabled Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 15:23 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 11:55 ` [PATCH v9 18/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Test the routing of " Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-01 12:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 19:29 ` [PATCH v9 00/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route peer-to-peer DMA by TLP class Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-06 21:22 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 21:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07 6:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-10-07 10:54 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-07 11:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261001125944.GM3401365@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox