From: "Christoph Schlameuss" <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Christoph Schlameuss" <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Jones" <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] scripts: Configure and update tools to allow basic b4 usage
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:42:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DI17SGGCTERY.21IR5YY0JNHFK@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16bf7ab2-c4ad-4982-9170-cd06015c39f9@redhat.com>
On Fri Apr 24, 2026 at 9:19 AM CEST, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 23/04/2026 16.16, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
>> Provide some basic configuration for checkpatch.pl so that use on the
>> command line is less confusing and actually useful.
>> Checking new patches with i.e. 'b4 prep --check' will now not just give you
>> dummy errors.
>>
>> Modify get_maintainer.pl to work when called from 'b4 prep --auto-to-cc'.
>>
>> ---
>> The second patch also copies the current codespell config from the kernel.
>> I think this would be nice to have but I would also understand if nobody
>> wants to add that dead weight here. In that case I would also agree drop
>> that second patch.
>
> IMHO the dictionary that comes along with the codespell utility should
> already be good enough to cover most of these typos, so I'm inclined to
> rather say "no" to the second patch. Instead, maybe you could introduce a
> k-u-t specific spelling.txt to get rid of the warning message, with some few
> entries like:
>
> kmv||kvm
> RDSMR||RDMSR
> WRSMR||WRMSR
>
> ?
>
> (the latter two entries were fixed by commit 784dd85d25d484)
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thomas
Fine with that. I will have a look around if there are some other things like
that we can add.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-24 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 14:16 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] scripts: Configure and update tools to allow basic b4 usage Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-23 14:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] scripts/checkpatch.pl: Add empty codespell and const_structs configs Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-24 7:00 ` Thomas Huth
2026-04-24 7:36 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-23 14:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] scripts/checkpatch.pl: Copy kernel codespell file Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-23 14:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/3] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: Ignore --nogit-chief-penguins option Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-24 7:31 ` Thomas Huth
2026-04-24 7:41 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-24 7:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] scripts: Configure and update tools to allow basic b4 usage Thomas Huth
2026-04-24 7:42 ` Christoph Schlameuss [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DI17SGGCTERY.21IR5YY0JNHFK@linux.ibm.com \
--to=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox