From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Adithya Jayachandran <ajayachandra@nvidia.com>,
Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>, William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/16] iommu/vt-d: Restore IOMMU state and reclaimed domain ids
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 21:46:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agzaTPROvwVO-3lO@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427175633.1978233-10-skhawaja@google.com>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 05:56:26PM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> During boot fetch the preserved state of IOMMU unit and if found then
> restore the state.
>
> - Reuse the root_table that was preserved in the previous kernel.
> - Reclaim the domain ids of the preserved domains for each preserved
> devices so these are not acquired by another domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 7 ++++
> drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index 68fecd4e57fa..4118a0861f38 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -670,10 +670,17 @@ void dmar_fault_dump_ptes(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 source_id,
> #endif
>
> /* iommu handling */
> -static int iommu_alloc_root_entry(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> +static int iommu_alloc_root_entry(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> + struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser)
> {
> struct root_entry *root;
>
> + if (iommu_ser) {
> + intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table(iommu, iommu_ser);
> + __iommu_flush_cache(iommu, iommu->root_entry, ROOT_SIZE);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
Minor nit: I still believe this condition block can be moved into the
caller? Since the called fetches iommu_ser, it can call this as a stand
alone helper and bypass calling iommu_alloc_root_entry if (iommu_ser).
> root = iommu_alloc_pages_node_sz(iommu->node, GFP_ATOMIC, SZ_4K);
> if (!root) {
> pr_err("Allocating root entry for %s failed\n",
> @@ -992,15 +999,16 @@ static void disable_dmar_iommu(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> iommu_disable_translation(iommu);
> }
>
> -static void free_dmar_iommu(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> +static void free_dmar_iommu(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser)
> {
> if (iommu->copied_tables) {
> bitmap_free(iommu->copied_tables);
> iommu->copied_tables = NULL;
> }
>
> - /* free context mapping */
> - free_context_table(iommu);
> + /* free context mapping if there is no serialized state. */
> + if (!iommu_ser)
> + free_context_table(iommu);
>
> if (ecap_prs(iommu->ecap))
> intel_iommu_finish_prq(iommu);
> @@ -1611,6 +1619,7 @@ static int copy_translation_tables(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>
> static int __init init_dmars(void)
> {
> + struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser = NULL;
> struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
> struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> int ret;
> @@ -1633,8 +1642,12 @@ static int __init init_dmars(void)
> intel_pasid_max_id);
> }
>
> + iommu_ser = iommu_get_preserved_data(iommu->reg_phys, IOMMU_INTEL);
> +
> intel_iommu_init_qi(iommu);
> - init_translation_status(iommu);
> +
> + if (!iommu_ser)
> + init_translation_status(iommu);
>
> if (translation_pre_enabled(iommu) && !is_kdump_kernel()) {
> iommu_disable_translation(iommu);
> @@ -1648,7 +1661,7 @@ static int __init init_dmars(void)
> * we could share the same root & context tables
> * among all IOMMU's. Need to Split it later.
> */
> - ret = iommu_alloc_root_entry(iommu);
> + ret = iommu_alloc_root_entry(iommu, iommu_ser);
> if (ret)
> goto free_iommu;
>
> @@ -1732,8 +1745,12 @@ static int __init init_dmars(void)
>
> free_iommu:
> for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
> - disable_dmar_iommu(iommu);
> - free_dmar_iommu(iommu);
> + iommu_ser = iommu_get_preserved_data(iommu->reg_phys, IOMMU_INTEL);
> +
> + if (!iommu_ser)
> + disable_dmar_iommu(iommu);
> +
> + free_dmar_iommu(iommu, iommu_ser);
> }
>
I'm wondering what happens if init_dmars fails for a preserved iommu?
Since we have non NULL iommu_ser, we'll skip disable_dmar_iommu and skip
free_context_table() inside free_dmar_iommu() as well. I'm concerned we
might leak some resources in this case. If the failure happens after we
set restored = 1, even a rmmod -> modprobe cycle won't help fix the leak
> return ret;
> @@ -2107,15 +2124,19 @@ int dmar_parse_one_satc(struct acpi_dmar_header *hdr, void *arg)
> static int intel_iommu_add(struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru)
> {
> struct intel_iommu *iommu = dmaru->iommu;
> + struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser = NULL;
> int ret;
>
> + /* Use IOMMU HW unit MMIO base to identify the preserved state. */
> + iommu_ser = iommu_get_preserved_data(iommu->reg_phys, IOMMU_INTEL);
Thanks for adding that comment! Really clever btw :)
> +
> /*
> * Disable translation if already enabled prior to OS handover.
> */
> - if (iommu->gcmd & DMA_GCMD_TE)
> + if (!iommu_ser && iommu->gcmd & DMA_GCMD_TE)
> iommu_disable_translation(iommu);
>
> - ret = iommu_alloc_root_entry(iommu);
> + ret = iommu_alloc_root_entry(iommu, iommu_ser);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
[snip]
> +
> +static int _restore_used_domain_ids(struct iommu_device_ser *ser, void *arg)
> +{
> + int id = ser->domain_iommu_ser.attachment_id;
> + struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_hw_ser;
> + struct intel_iommu *iommu = arg;
> +
> + iommu_hw_ser = phys_to_virt(ser->domain_iommu_ser.iommu_phys);
We should check for iommu_phys being NULL here.. I know corruptions can
be funnier but a WARN_ON(!iommu_phys) could help catch NULL corruptions
> + if (iommu_hw_ser->type != IOMMU_INTEL)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Only allocate domain ID from associated IOMMU HW unit */
> + if (iommu_hw_ser->intel.phys_addr != iommu->reg_phys)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * This can fail as multiple preserved devices can share the same domain
> + * ID. Since this is done during DMAR init so these failures can be
> + * ignored.
> + */
> + ida_alloc_range(&iommu->domain_ida, id, id, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
Thanks,
Praan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-19 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 17:56 [PATCH v2 00/16] iommu: Add live update state preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] liveupdate: luo_file: Add internal APIs for file preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-18 11:40 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-18 19:08 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] iommu: Implement IOMMU Live update FLB callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-01 21:45 ` David Matlack
2026-05-18 11:52 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-18 14:10 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-18 15:08 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-18 12:33 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-18 17:20 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-18 17:32 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-18 17:06 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] iommu: Implement IOMMU domain preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-01 22:08 ` David Matlack
2026-05-04 18:33 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-18 13:13 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-18 18:55 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-18 21:36 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] iommu: Implement device and IOMMU HW preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-01 22:42 ` David Matlack
2026-05-04 19:06 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-07 2:07 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-07 18:47 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-18 14:01 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-18 18:33 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-18 13:55 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-18 18:44 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] iommu/pages: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve/restore iommu pages Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-18 14:23 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-18 17:22 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] iommupt: Implement preserve/unpreserve/restore callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-07 2:55 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-07 18:40 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-19 13:15 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-19 17:14 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] iommu/vt-d: Implement device and iommu preserve/unpreserve ops Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-07 6:25 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-08 2:36 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-18 20:32 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-19 14:40 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-19 18:26 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] iommu: Add APIs to get iommu and device preserved state Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-19 15:52 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] iommu/vt-d: Restore IOMMU state and reclaimed domain ids Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-07 9:05 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-07 17:35 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-19 21:46 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] iommu: Restore and reattach preserved domains to devices Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-07 13:54 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-07 16:52 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] iommu/vt-d: preserve PASID table of preserved device Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-08 6:05 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-11 18:45 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-12 11:32 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-19 22:35 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] iommufd: Implement ioctl to mark HWPT for preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-19 23:05 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] iommufd: Persist iommu hardware pagetables for live update Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-20 0:00 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] iommufd: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve a vfio cdev Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-20 0:46 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] vfio/pci: Preserve the iommufd state of the " Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-20 0:57 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-04-27 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] iommufd/selftest: Add test to verify iommufd preservation Samiullah Khawaja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agzaTPROvwVO-3lO@google.com \
--to=praan@google.com \
--cc=ajayachandra@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=witu@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhuyifei@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox