From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, kas@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com,
binbin.wu@linux.intel.com, xiaoyao.li@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] KVM: TDX: Drop kvm_x86_ops.link_external_spt()
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 11:27:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahc3hmTa3TiOTZv6@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260509075357.4113-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
On Sat, May 09, 2026, Yan Zhao wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>
> Drop the dedicated .link_external_spt() for linking S-EPT pages, and
> instead funnel everything through .set_external_spte() for mapping S-EPT
> entries. Using separate hooks doesn't help prevent TDP MMU details from
> bleeding into TDX, and vice versa; to the contrary, dedicated callbacks
> will result in _more_ pollution when hugepage support is added, e.g. will
> require the TDP MMU to know details about the splitting rules for TDX that
> aren't all that relevant to the TDP MMU.
>
> Ideally, KVM would provide a single pair of hooks to set S-EPT entries,
> one hook for setting SPTEs under write-lock and another for setting SPTEs
> under read-lock (e.g. to ensure the entire operation is "atomic", to allow
> for failure, etc.). Sadly, TDX's requirement that all child S-EPT entries
> are removed before the parent makes that impractical: the TDP MMU
> deliberately prunes non-leaf SPTEs and _then_ processes its children, thus
> making it quite important for the TDP MMU to differentiate between zapping
> leaf and non-leaf S-EPT entries.
>
> However, that's the _only_ case that's truly special, and even that case
> could be shoehorned into a single hook; it just wouldn't be a net positive.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> [Rick: add in trivial feedback]
> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
> ---
> MMU_refactors v2:
> - Moved this patch to the very beginning of the series so that when
> warnings like "KVM_BUG_ON(!is_shadow_present_pte(new_spte), kvm)" are
> removed from __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic() in TDP MMU in a later patch, the
> atomic zap change can be propagated via the .set_external_spte() op.
> (Yan).
>
> MMU_refactors v1:
> - rename external_spt->sept_pt (Rick, Yan)
Put the versioning info below the "---" that delineates the diff, otherwise
`git am` adds it to the changelog.
> ---
I.e. put it here.
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h | 1 -
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 --
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 29 +-------------
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-27 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-09 7:52 [PATCH v2 00/15] TDX MMU refactors Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] KVM: TDX: Drop kvm_x86_ops.link_external_spt() Yan Zhao
2026-05-27 18:27 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-05-27 19:57 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-05-27 22:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] KVM: TDX: Wrap mapping of leaf and non-leaf S-EPT entries into helpers Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Fold set_external_spte_present() into its sole caller Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Plumb param "old_spte" into kvm_x86_ops.set_external_spte() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] KVM: TDX: Move KVM_BUG_ON()s in __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic() to TDX code Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] KVM: TDX: Move lockdep assert " Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Morph !is_frozen_spte() check into a KVM_MMU_WARN_ON() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Plumb "sp" _pointer_ into the TDP MMU's handle_changed_spte() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Centrally propagate to-present/atomic zap updates to external PTEs Yan Zhao
2026-05-19 1:35 ` Yan Zhao
2026-05-19 6:08 ` Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop KVM_BUG_ON() on shared lock to zap child " Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] KVM: TDX: Hoist tdx_sept_remove_private_spte() above set_private_spte() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] KVM: TDX: Drop kvm_x86_ops.remove_external_spte() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] KVM: TDX: Rename tdx_sept_remove_private_spte() to show it's for leaf SPTEs Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: x86: Move error handling inside free_external_spt() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] KVM: TDX: Move external page table freeing to TDX code Yan Zhao
2026-05-29 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] TDX MMU refactors Sean Christopherson
2026-06-01 2:54 ` Yan Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahc3hmTa3TiOTZv6@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox