From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Okamoto Takayuki <tokamoto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Zhang Lei <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] KVM: Clarify KVM_{SET,GET}_ONE_REG error code documentation
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:42:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190416124243.GP3567@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190415152132.avwkmmuwolh7juhy@kamzik.brq.redhat.com>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 05:21:32PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 05:28:17PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > The current error code documentation for KVM_GET_ONE_REG and
> > KVM_SET_ONE_REG could be read as implying that all architectures
> > implement these error codes, or that KVM guararntees which error
>
> guarantees
>
> > code is returned in a particular situation.
> >
> > Because this is not really the case, this patch waters down the
> > documentation explicitly to remove such guarantees.
> >
> > EPERM is marked as arm64-specific, since for now arm64 really is
> > the only architecture that yields this error code for the
> > finalization-required case. Keeping this as a distinct error code
> > is useful however for debugging due to the statefulness of the API
> > in this instance.
> >
> > No functional change.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> > Fixes: 395f562f2b4c ("KVM: Document errors for KVM_GET_ONE_REG and KVM_SET_ONE_REG")
> > Fixes: 50036ad06b7f ("KVM: arm64/sve: Document KVM API extensions for SVE")
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 14 +++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> > index b115b23..74c51c7 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> > @@ -1873,8 +1873,10 @@ Parameters: struct kvm_one_reg (in)
> > Returns: 0 on success, negative value on failure
> > Errors:
> > ENOENT: no such register
> > - EPERM: register access forbidden for architecture-dependent reasons
> > - EINVAL: other errors, such as bad size encoding for a known register
> > + EINVAL: invalid register ID, or no such register
> > + EPERM: (arm64) register access not allowed before vcpu finalization
> > +(These error codes are indicative only: do not rely on a specific error
> > +code being returned in a specific situation.)
> >
> > struct kvm_one_reg {
> > __u64 id;
> > @@ -2258,10 +2260,12 @@ Architectures: all
> > Type: vcpu ioctl
> > Parameters: struct kvm_one_reg (in and out)
> > Returns: 0 on success, negative value on failure
> > -Errors:
> > +Errors include:
> > ENOENT: no such register
> > - EPERM: register access forbidden for architecture-dependent reasons
> > - EINVAL: other errors, such as bad size encoding for a known register
> > + EINVAL: invalid register ID, or no such register
> > + EPERM: (arm64) register access not allowed before vcpu finalization
> > +(These error codes are indicative only: do not rely on a specific error
> > +code being returned in a specific situation.)
> >
> > This ioctl allows to receive the value of a single register implemented
> > in a vcpu. The register to read is indicated by the "id" field of the
> > --
> > 2.1.4
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Thanks
---Dave
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Okamoto Takayuki <tokamoto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Zhang Lei <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] KVM: Clarify KVM_{SET,GET}_ONE_REG error code documentation
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:42:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190416124243.GP3567@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190416124243.tqQjQscirFHA5hGfAOce2OZ3jgtTrhQ1ovGh-VlHzwk@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190415152132.avwkmmuwolh7juhy@kamzik.brq.redhat.com>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8", Size: 3239 bytes --]
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 05:21:32PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 05:28:17PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > The current error code documentation for KVM_GET_ONE_REG and
> > KVM_SET_ONE_REG could be read as implying that all architectures
> > implement these error codes, or that KVM guararntees which error
>
> guarantees
>
> > code is returned in a particular situation.
> >
> > Because this is not really the case, this patch waters down the
> > documentation explicitly to remove such guarantees.
> >
> > EPERM is marked as arm64-specific, since for now arm64 really is
> > the only architecture that yields this error code for the
> > finalization-required case. Keeping this as a distinct error code
> > is useful however for debugging due to the statefulness of the API
> > in this instance.
> >
> > No functional change.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> > Fixes: 395f562f2b4c ("KVM: Document errors for KVM_GET_ONE_REG and KVM_SET_ONE_REG")
> > Fixes: 50036ad06b7f ("KVM: arm64/sve: Document KVM API extensions for SVE")
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 14 +++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> > index b115b23..74c51c7 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> > @@ -1873,8 +1873,10 @@ Parameters: struct kvm_one_reg (in)
> > Returns: 0 on success, negative value on failure
> > Errors:
> > ENOENT: no such register
> > - EPERM: register access forbidden for architecture-dependent reasons
> > - EINVAL: other errors, such as bad size encoding for a known register
> > + EINVAL: invalid register ID, or no such register
> > + EPERM: (arm64) register access not allowed before vcpu finalization
> > +(These error codes are indicative only: do not rely on a specific error
> > +code being returned in a specific situation.)
> >
> > struct kvm_one_reg {
> > __u64 id;
> > @@ -2258,10 +2260,12 @@ Architectures: all
> > Type: vcpu ioctl
> > Parameters: struct kvm_one_reg (in and out)
> > Returns: 0 on success, negative value on failure
> > -Errors:
> > +Errors include:
> > ENOENT: no such register
> > - EPERM: register access forbidden for architecture-dependent reasons
> > - EINVAL: other errors, such as bad size encoding for a known register
> > + EINVAL: invalid register ID, or no such register
> > + EPERM: (arm64) register access not allowed before vcpu finalization
> > +(These error codes are indicative only: do not rely on a specific error
> > +code being returned in a specific situation.)
> >
> > This ioctl allows to receive the value of a single register implemented
> > in a vcpu. The register to read is indicated by the "id" field of the
> > --
> > 2.1.4
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Thanks
---Dave
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-16 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-12 16:28 [PATCH 00/14] KVM: arm64: SVE cleanups Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 01/14] arm64/sve: Clarify vq map semantics Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 02/14] KVM: arm/arm64: Demote kvm_arm_init_arch_resources() to just set up SVE Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 03/14] KVM: arm: Make vcpu finalization stubs into inline functions Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 04/14] KVM: arm64/sve: sys_regs: Demote redundant vcpu_has_sve() checks to WARNs Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 05/14] KVM: arm64/sve: Clean up UAPI register ID definitions Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-15 15:17 ` Andrew Jones
2019-04-15 15:17 ` Andrew Jones
2019-04-16 12:37 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 12:37 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 06/14] KVM: arm64/sve: Miscellaneous tidyups in guest.c Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 07/14] KVM: arm64/sve: Make register ioctl access errors more consistent Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 08/14] KVM: arm64/sve: WARN when avoiding divide-by-zero in sve_reg_to_region() Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 09/14] KVM: arm64/sve: Simplify KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS array sizing Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-15 15:20 ` Andrew Jones
2019-04-15 15:20 ` Andrew Jones
2019-04-16 12:41 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 12:41 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 13:00 ` Andrew Jones
2019-04-16 13:00 ` Andrew Jones
2019-04-16 14:10 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 14:10 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 14:28 ` Andrew Jones
2019-04-16 14:28 ` Andrew Jones
2019-04-16 15:36 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 15:36 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 15:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 15:52 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17 4:16 ` Andrew Jones
2019-04-17 4:16 ` Andrew Jones
2019-04-17 14:01 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17 14:01 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 10/14] KVM: arm64/sve: Explain validity checks in set_sve_vls() Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 11/14] KVM: arm/arm64: Clean up vcpu finalization function parameter naming Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 12/14] KVM: Clarify capability requirements for KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 13/14] KVM: Clarify KVM_{SET, GET}_ONE_REG error code documentation Dave Martin
2019-04-15 15:21 ` [PATCH 13/14] KVM: Clarify KVM_{SET,GET}_ONE_REG " Andrew Jones
2019-04-15 15:21 ` Andrew Jones
2019-04-16 12:42 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2019-04-16 12:42 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 14/14] KVM: arm64: Clarify access behaviour for out-of-range SVE register slice IDs Dave Martin
2019-04-12 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-15 15:22 ` [PATCH 00/14] KVM: arm64: SVE cleanups Andrew Jones
2019-04-15 15:22 ` Andrew Jones
2019-04-16 12:46 ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 12:46 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190416124243.GP3567@e103592.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cdall@kernel.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tokamoto@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox