From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/11] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Simplify feature dependency
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 13:26:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250714122634.3334816-10-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250714122634.3334816-1-maz@kernel.org>
Describing the dependencies between registers and features is on
the masochistic side of things, with hard-coded values that would
be better taken from the existing description.
Add a couple of helpers to that effect, and repaint the dependency
array. More could be done to improve this test, but my interest is
wearing thin...
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
.../selftests/kvm/arm64/get-reg-list.c | 52 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/get-reg-list.c
index d01798b6b3b47..a35b01d08cc63 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/get-reg-list.c
@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@
#include "test_util.h"
#include "processor.h"
+#define SYS_REG(r) ARM64_SYS_REG(sys_reg_Op0(SYS_ ## r), \
+ sys_reg_Op1(SYS_ ## r), \
+ sys_reg_CRn(SYS_ ## r), \
+ sys_reg_CRm(SYS_ ## r), \
+ sys_reg_Op2(SYS_ ## r))
+
struct feature_id_reg {
__u64 reg;
__u64 id_reg;
@@ -22,37 +28,23 @@ struct feature_id_reg {
__u64 feat_min;
};
-static struct feature_id_reg feat_id_regs[] = {
- {
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 2, 0, 3), /* TCR2_EL1 */
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 7, 3), /* ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1 */
- 0,
- 1
- },
- {
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 10, 2, 2), /* PIRE0_EL1 */
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 7, 3), /* ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1 */
- 8,
- 1
- },
- {
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 10, 2, 3), /* PIR_EL1 */
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 7, 3), /* ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1 */
- 8,
- 1
- },
- {
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 10, 2, 4), /* POR_EL1 */
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 7, 3), /* ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1 */
- 16,
- 1
- },
- {
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 10, 2, 4), /* POR_EL0 */
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 7, 3), /* ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1 */
- 16,
- 1
+#define FEAT(id, f, v) \
+ .id_reg = SYS_REG(id), \
+ .feat_shift = id ## _ ## f ## _SHIFT, \
+ .feat_min = id ## _ ## f ## _ ## v
+
+#define REG_FEAT(r, id, f, v) \
+ { \
+ .reg = SYS_REG(r), \
+ FEAT(id, f, v) \
}
+
+static struct feature_id_reg feat_id_regs[] = {
+ REG_FEAT(TCR2_EL1, ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1, TCRX, IMP),
+ REG_FEAT(PIRE0_EL1, ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1, S1PIE, IMP),
+ REG_FEAT(PIR_EL1, ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1, S1PIE, IMP),
+ REG_FEAT(POR_EL1, ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1, S1POE, IMP),
+ REG_FEAT(POR_EL0, ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1, S1POE, IMP),
};
bool filter_reg(__u64 reg)
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-14 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-14 12:26 [PATCH 00/11] KVM: arm64: nv: Userspace register visibility fixes Marc Zyngier
2025-07-14 12:26 ` [PATCH 01/11] KVM: arm64: Make RVBAR_EL2 accesses UNDEF Marc Zyngier
2025-07-14 12:26 ` [PATCH 02/11] KVM: arm64: Don't advertise ICH_*_EL2 registers through GET_ONE_REG Marc Zyngier
2025-07-14 12:26 ` [PATCH 03/11] KVM: arm64: Define constant value for ICC_SRE_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2025-07-14 12:26 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: arm64: Define helper for ICH_VTR_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2025-07-14 12:26 ` [PATCH 05/11] KVM: arm64: Let GICv3 save/restore honor visibility attribute Marc Zyngier
2025-07-14 12:26 ` [PATCH 06/11] KVM: arm64: Expose GICv3 EL2 registers via KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CPU_SYSREGS Marc Zyngier
2025-07-14 12:26 ` [PATCH 07/11] KVM: arm64: Condition FGT registers on feature availability Marc Zyngier
2025-07-14 12:26 ` [PATCH 08/11] KVM: arm64: Advertise FGT2 registers to userspace Marc Zyngier
2025-07-14 12:26 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2025-07-14 22:49 ` [PATCH 09/11] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Simplify feature dependency Itaru Kitayama
2025-07-14 12:26 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Add base EL2 registers Marc Zyngier
2025-07-14 12:26 ` [PATCH 11/11] KVM: arm64: Document registers exposed via KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CPU_SYSREGS Marc Zyngier
2025-07-16 16:47 ` [PATCH 00/11] KVM: arm64: nv: Userspace register visibility fixes Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250714122634.3334816-10-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox